Leftist Academic agenda alive and well at Cambridge

Yesterday I sent a very silly article about a very silly man to a friend of mine, commenting that I could imagine what my father would have said about this “academic” – he would have called him a “Fathead!” and then said that he had been “educated beyond his intellectual capacity.” I don’t think anyone would disagree with that:

Cambridge 1.jpg

Link

I quote:

‘I would lower the voting age to six, not 16, and I’m serious about that,’ he said. ‘I would want people who vote to be able to read, so I would exclude reception.

‘The old thing about voting for people like you wouldn’t happen, 9-year-olds aren’t going to elect 9-year-olds to Parliament and even if they did they’d be outvoted.

‘What’s the worst that could happen? At least it would be exciting, it would make elections more fun. ‘

Prof Runciman said the system of only allowing voting at 18 but having no cut-off point at the other end left young people vastly outnumbered.

He did not suggest stripping older people of their votes but said including young children was necessary to correct the ‘structural imbalance’.

What a total balloon! But where is the outrage? Where are the calls amongst his fellow academics to “burn the witch”? No, there are none, because in the intellectual vacuum of Cambridge University controversy is fine as long as it suits the general agenda of the Left.

When it doesn’t, then the calls for “burn the witch” are as shrill as can be, as in the case of this poor unfortunate fellow who has discovered that there is a link between race and intellect as well as race and criminality. This is not new, but 200 of his fellow intellectuals from as far away as Princeton are determined to destroy him:

Cambridge 2.jpg

Link

The phrase “ethically suspect” is particularly amusing and pertinent – it tells me that it’s unethical, in their minds, to even look at the issue. It’s only ethical to ignore the issues caused by “diversity” and not address them scientifically. Because they don’t like it they label him a eugenicist, which he may or may no be, and call his work “pseudoscience” which it is not. This is a subject which has been studied over and over and the conclusion is that there is a definite difference in intelligence between races, on average. But we mustn’t say so, or we will fall foul of the thought police.

I quote:

They said that they are ‘deeply concerned that racist pseudoscience is being legitimised through association with the University of Cambridge.’

They added: ‘This fellowship was awarded to Carl despite his attendance at, and public defence of, the discredited ‘London Conference on Intelligence’, where racist and pseudoscientific work has been regularly presented.

‘Carl’s work has already been used by extremist and far-right media outlets with the aim of stoking xenophobic and anti-immigrant rhetoric…this kind of pseudoscientific racism runs the serious risk of being used to justify policies that directly harm vulnerable populations.’

Yes, because immigrants are vulnerable, but the populations they join are not. The immigrants must be allowed to enter and destroy our countries (because destroy them they will) because otherwise it’s racist.

Take a look at Ethiopia:

tragic ethiopia.jpg

When Africans make Africa great they will be far more welcome here. The men of Africa should be at home building up their countries, but that is not the plan. As we know the plan is the Kalergi Plan: Kalergi plan – advertised, yet ignored by the masses

Remember folks, it’s not the immigrants fault in all this – our leaders are to blame. Diversity is our destruction, and intellectual rigour will not be applied unless you want to lose your career.

Lis

Advertisements

Getting past the Daily Mail censors to reveal the truth about organ donation

I have found one of the Daily Mail’s censored words! I have! It’s the word “abomination”, isn’t that interesting?

After two attempts last night to share this short comment on this article, I succeeded this morning when I added dots into the word abomination:

Are you aware that organs come from living people, and are not taken after death as the ordinary person understands it? If so you will understand that people should never be used in this way. As for animals, this is an absolute abom.in.ation.

Why is this important? Because organ donation is an important topic on this blog, and as you’ll see from the following top three comments, most Daily Mail readers would rather humans be vivisected than animals:

dm comments 3.jpg

So taking a pig’s heart is terrible evil and exploitation, yeah? Here’s the comment I replied to, which is currently the seventh of the top ten:

dm comment

These people really do think it’s cruel to take an animals organ, but not to take a human one.They probably believe that the animal will be killed for the organ but that human organs are taken “after death”. This is part of the sick trick our satanic rulers have played on us.

The bit which the DM clearly didn’t like is that taking that organ (it wouldn’t matter which animal it came from, being a pig is just the most “obviously” bad) and putting it inside a human, made in the image of God is an ABOMINATION!

These fools revere animals above humans!

We are not to love our lives “to the death”

“and they did overcome him because of the blood of the Lamb, and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life — unto death;” Revelation 11:12 [YLT]

Taking an organ from another human to prolong another human life is to deny the humanity of the “donor” (not a donor because they have not given informed consent to be vivisected for their organs – vivisected means to be cut open alive, often without anaesthetic). It is theft: state sanctioned murder. To put an animal part into a human, a pig’s heart of all things, is to fly in the face of God and say that human life is worth more than God’s Will!

Doctors cannot deliver you out of the hand of God! God tells us who He is:

“See now that I am He; there is no God besides Me. I bring death and I give life; I wound and I heal, and there is no one who can deliver from My hand.” Deuteronomy 32:39 [KJV]

I’ll end with sharing Hannah’s prayer from the book of Samuel. First the context. In Chapter 1 we see Hannah pray for a child, and she promises this child to God. God grants her wish, and opens her womb. At the end of Chapter 1 we read: [emphasis added]

24 And when she had weaned him, she took him up with her, with three bullocks, and one ephah of flour, and a bottle of wine, and brought him unto the house of the Lord in Shiloh: and the child was young.

25 And they slew a bullock, and brought the child to Eli.

26 And she said, Oh my lord, as thy soul liveth, my lord, I am the woman that stood by thee here, praying unto the Lord.

27 For this child I prayed; and the Lord hath given me my petition which I asked of him:

28 Therefore also I have lent him to the Lord; as long as he liveth he shall be lent to the Lord. And he worshipped the Lord there. [KJV]

In chapter two we read her prayer: [emphasis added]

1 And Hannah prayed, and said, My heart rejoiceth in the Lord, mine horn is exalted in the Lord: my mouth is enlarged over mine enemies; because I rejoice in thy salvation.

2 There is none holy as the Lord: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.

3 Talk no more so exceeding proudly; let not arrogancy come out of your mouth: for the Lord is a God of knowledge, and by him actions are weighed.

4 The bows of the mighty men are broken, and they that stumbled are girded with strength.

5 They that were full have hired out themselves for bread; and they that were hungry ceased: so that the barren hath born seven; and she that hath many children is waxed feeble.

6 The Lord killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.

7 The Lord maketh poor, and maketh rich: he bringeth low, and lifteth up.

8 He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s, and he hath set the world upon them.

9 He will keep the feet of his saints, and the wicked shall be silent in darkness; for by strength shall no man prevail.

10 The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces; out of heaven shall he thunder upon them: the Lord shall judge the ends of the earth; and he shall give strength unto his king, and exalt the horn of his anointed.

I love her prayer because she acknowledges the might and power of God.

When we turn to medical science, and in this case it’s “abomination science”, we are denying the might and power of God! We are saying that without medical intervention this person will die, as if we should not turn to God first and see what He says!

Here are some previous relevant posts for you to read:

Organ donation scandal – the truth about organ donation – MUST READ MUST SHARE

The Truth About Organ Donation: 13 y.o. boy wakes up as doctors prepare to harvest his organs

Go to God, or ask the devil?

Medical word-magic

May the fear of God bring you into all wisdom.

Lis

“Yin disease” and the Left

Now, please bear with me, because I’ll understand if you think I’m going off the reservation here mentioning this term “yin” from Chinese medicine. I am not advocating that system, I just want to share with you some observations about modern people and diet and lifestyle trends which will shock you and send you off looking for a juicy steak. I’ll just clarify for those unfamiliar with the terms, “yin” in Chinese medical terms is a feminine quality, and “yang” is a masculine quality.

For those of us watching politics and the behaviour of the Left, I think we can see which way our people and our culture is heading. I’m going to be so bold as to say that without this condition the Left and the Marxists could not have made the headway they have. That is a bold statement, but I believe the following observations back this up. It all relates to feminine attributes and excessive levels of sensitivity. Let’s get started.

I’ll begin by sharing the heading paragraph of this article which you can go and read for yourself:

Definition.  Yin disease is a term to describe a constellation of symptoms that often appear together and are related to an excessively yin condition of the body.  This condition is very common today and is therefore worth discussing.  It is not recognized as a medical diagnosis at this time, unfortunately. 

For brevity, I’m going to go straight to the psychological aspects, but I recommend you read the whole article to see the number of ever-more-common medical symptoms which are associated with being too feminised, or yin (as a consequence of diet in particular). Everything from low thyroid and adrenal fatigue to Candida yeast overgrowth and other gut issues relate strongly to the dietary and lifestyle changes which have been “recommended” to us by our keepers for the last forty or more years.

So let’s get straight into the issues which the Left and it’s associates are manifesting: [emphasis added]

Psychological aspects.

Yin mental qualities include feelings of low self-esteem, denial, confusion, frustration, fear, unhappiness, sometimes unwarranted guilt, spaciness, too much grief and sadness, shame, and at times, schizoid or even a schizophrenic condition.

Often, the person is somewhat dishonest.  This is often hidden and due often to weakness and some confusion.  Yin people feel they must lie, cheat, steal and do other things that are dishonest and out of integrity because they are weak and they feel like victims who are oppressed.  This is how they often justify their bad behavior.

More yin individuals are usually not as able to be confrontative and direct, which are more yang traits.  Instead, they act covertly and often run from confrontation, brutal honesty and true integrity. […]

Resentment. 

Those with yin disease are generally quite angry underneath, no matter how they may appear.  Their anger is chronic, however, a quality called resentment or hostility.  One reason is that that resentment is a type of toxic yang quality that helps balance them.  Another way of describing it is that they have little natural energy, and many use anger and resentment to get going and to function.  It is a kind of reactive energy that is not exactly natural, but it keeps them functioning. […]

Seductive. 

Seduction is the ability to draw people to oneself, and to “con” people, which means to get them to do things they ordinarily would not do.  Often, these psychological traits are called seductive or “charming”.

Women tend to use their bodies in this way, often without trying.  Their bodies are more yin, and therefore are automatically somewhat seductive or “attractive” in nature.  If they don’t wake up and realize what they are doing, usually this trait gets them in trouble with the very yang – aggressive and sexual – males.  Then they complain that men are crude, rough, brutal and not interested in deep love.  They do not realize that they created the situation with their seductive, yin quality.  This is a difficult lesson for all women, especially those that are naturally pretty or attractive.

Seducers do not like to use force to get their way.  That would be “pushing people around”  Instead, they use the yin method of pulling or drawing people to them.  Although they do not use force in a yang way, they may use it in a yin way to create a vacuum, for example, that draws people in, like bees to honey.  Many secretly love power and force, but do it in a subtle way.  Many seem loving, but really they are not.  They are con artists or confidence artists who trick people.

WITCHCRAFT

Sorcery and witchcraft, which is the casting of spells, hexes and other techniques, is a yin method of gaining and keeping power and control over others. It appeals more to those who are more yin, in general, and it is secretive and deceitful, which they prefer.

There is a white witchcraft that may appear yin because it is gentle and loving.  However, in fact it is more yang, even if it is done by a woman, as it generally is.  It is really not witchcraft, however, because it does not involve sorcery, casting of spells and hexing people.  Instead, it is about breaking the spells and the hexes.

If you made it through that wall of text, great, thanks for keeping going with this, because I’m not done yet.

What constitutes a yin, or feminising diet? The very diet we’ve been told to consume for many years with a majority of carbohydrates. Diets heavy in carbs, fruit and sugar and low in meat and cooked vegetables are the most damaging in terms of making a person yin, and Dr Lawrence Wilson also says that eating too many salads and raw food diets are also very “yin” in nature. Think of it this way, the yin diet of modern America and Europe is a feminising diet (and our plain observations bear that out, don’t they?). To put it in colloquial terms, it’s a pussifying diet. Oh yes. Now where was I, oh yes… Once people have been eating too many carbs for a long time they become more and more sensitive (and I can attest to this, as I was vegetarian for about 15 years). As you become more sensitive, you then see victimhood and oppression everywhere!

So let’s take a look at the latest in how this condition manifests itself:

PETA has come out and wants us to change our language to ensure we don’t use animals in our metaphors (you know, because “cruelty”). This is a classic Marxist attack on normalcy, to destabilise you and make you worry about opening your mouth. Let’s take a look at their suggestions, shall we? (Read more: Link)

disaster cra.jpg

Now don’t laugh.

But the silliness continues, and when it comes to veganism, here is where a personal choice, which it is, becomes a brutal and offensive tool in the hands of Marxists. You don’t see meat eaters protesting outside Health Food Shops – we don’t need to, we don’t see victimhood and oppression everywhere. We are not oppressed by veganism – we see it as a personal choice, whereas many vegans cannot allow us to make our personal choice without making a big-attempt-at-guilt-inducing fuss about it.

But it’s getting stranger. Veganism could now be treated as a “religion” – and we should all be concerned about the endless court cases this could create. No protection for Christian rights, but there will be endless protections for vegans if this goes ahead. I’ll quote from this article here: [emphasis added]

Piers Morgan got into a heated debate with columnist Liz Jones on GMB on Wednesday, over her calls for veganism to be treated as a religion. 

The controversial Good Morning Britain host accused the writer, who describes herself as a practising vegan but confessed to sometimes eating eggs, of wanting to ‘end the human race’ because she suggested humans are the ‘most dangerous animal on the planet’, and could not continue to consume meat.

It follows news of a landmark employment tribunal that is currently debating whether ethical veganism should be considered a religion, which greatly offended Piers.

Liz said she worshipped animals as her god and believed that it being considered a religion would help protect her from ridicule; but Piers fiercely questioned her dedication to being a vegan after she confessed to eating eggs.

Again, note that vegans need protection from ridicule because they are victims (because their diet, amongst other things, makes them hyper-sensitive). In fact, even taking up this sensitive attitude can make you more “yin” or feminised. According to Dr Wilson: [emphasis added]

Attitudes can make one very yin.  Even one’s mental attitude and excessive emotions may be factors.  For example, victim thinking, sadness, guilt and grief have a very yin effect on the body.  Socialist political thinking is very yin, while a belief in the Judeo-Christian Father God, freedom, liberty and capitalism are more yang. 

[…] 28. Yin beliefs are believing in victimhood, oppression, class warfare, social justice, group rights, moral relativism and the benefits of socialism and perhaps communism.  These beliefs and attitudes make one far more yin.  If you want to become more yang, give them up.

I know this is easier said than done, but I did it and so can you.  Realize they are wrong, they do not work, anyway.  Much more yang concepts include freedom or personal liberty, God, the Ten Commandments of Moses, capitalism, and absolute truth, not moral relativism.

29. More yin attitudes are discouragement, depression, negativity, cynicism, fatigue, apathy and despair.  Do your best to avoid these.  There is much that one can do to stay positive, uplifted, inspired, hopeful and interested in life.  Finding meaningful work is one way.  Helping others is very good.  Wishing people well is good.  Reading spiritual texts is another.  Listening to uplifting music may be helpful.  Having good friends is another.

He also lists numerous other causes of this condition, besides diet, like toxin exposure, medical drugs and even some food supplements, too frequent bathing, EMF exposure and being overly focused on sex.

I’ll end by saying that although Dr Lawrence Wilson has a few ideas I believe are wrong (when it comes to “energy” and so forth), his observations here seem spot on for exactly where we as modern Western societies are. This also explains why feminism, #MeToo and other movements have gained such traction. Men in particular need to examine their diet and lifestyle to take back the masculine characteristics that God designed them to have.

God Bless you

Lis

What about the Book of Jasher, Jubilees and Enoch?

Have you ever studied these extra-biblical texts? I haven’t, but often hear them mentioned or quoted in various ministries teachings. I know some teachers set some store by them, and I have prayed about whether to acquire them and read them. I didn’t get any idea that I should get them, and as someone who has only been studying the bible for a few short years, should I be looking beyond known scripture anyway?

Then on Friday I came across this detailed and exhaustive study of these three much-revered books. The ministry involved (The Way Biblical Fellowship) is one I trust for their desire for truth, and their humility in presenting that truth, so I watched, and was very much blessed by it.

I am very grateful to them for doing the cognitive “legwork” of identifying the inconsistencies these books contain, and reading through the histories of these documents which I had wondered about.

I hope this teaching will bless you immensely – and that you will now view these texts with greater clarity.

You don’t need anything beyond the bible we have to be saved through faith, and perfected through obedience – God has kept His word whole for us. Trust in the word of God, and be careful not to add to it, nor allow others to add to it for you.

Ministers, teachers, need to be careful with their doctrines in the light of such careful study. I will be more careful in future which ministries I listen to, and allow to broadcast in my home.

May the Fear of God bring you into all Wisdom.

Lis

Dead men’s bones and uncleanness

I thought it was time to share this again.

Selah Ministries

Yeshua said in Matthew 23:27:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.”

In Numbers 19:11, we are told:

“He that toucheth the dead body of any man shall be unclean seven days.”

Those who touch the dead are unclean for seven days. In fact they must wash themselves with water on the third and seventh day to be clean.

In Luke 11:44 Yeshua also says:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not aware of them.”

Walking over a grave, unbeknownst, is clearly also an issue – an issue of uncleanness.

Yet somehow, the catholic church justified building churches surrounded by graves, even the aisles of many old English churches…

View original post 287 more words

David Pawson – De-Greecing The Church

Please take some time to listen to these excellent talks about how Greek influence has affected the religion of God. It’s important that we understand that the basis of our faith has Hebrew roots, and that the Hebrew mindset is very different to the Greek. The influence of Greece on our faith and our culture, is enormous. Mr Pawson takes us through so many of those influences as they can be seen in our modern world today. From democracy to sport, Greece has had a hand in shaping our culture, and also our faith in ways we may not be aware of. A dear friend sent me this, and I recommend it to you.

 

God Bless you

Lis

“Christians” again trying to tear down Torah followers for their “legalism”

This is a bit depressing, and I’m not going to go into the ins and outs of who said what. Suffice to say that amongst the videos shown to me on the side bar on Youtube I found a video which indicates that another ministry which has come to Torah has lost a lot of followers due to their stance. It’s bound to happen, but I want to highlight a comment that was made in response to one of these attack videos to show you the hypocrisy.

legalism struggle.jpg

Here’s the text in full with emphasis added:

“When I first started watching Lea, I really enjoyed her videos. She was on fire speaking against the New Age, one of my favorite subjects. She shot down drag queen story time, the women’s march, etc. I loved her passion. Somewhere things changed. They are now clearly teaching false doctrine. And the thing is, it’s not even about “who’s right?”. It’s about people. Because doctrine affects actual people. They don’t seem to understand that real people in real life struggle AGAINST legalism. I am one of them. For me, trying to follow the law is torturous and futile beyond description. It tears me down–as it should–because no one has ever been able to follow the law. Christ came to set the captives free. I hate to think that maybe they do realize this and actually want to lead people astray. I just don’t know…but one thing is for sure…demonic influence can be subtle and deceiving. Only God can see true motives. Thank you for your messages.”

I feel sorry for those who really believe this because what they are saying, (as they pick up their dog’s poop from the pavement to avoid a fine, file their taxes on time to avoid penalties and keep to the speed limit because “it’s the law”), is that they refuse to follow God’s Law. They can keep man’s laws (ever shifting, changing according to the whim of people) and do so every single day. There are few more law-abiding people than Christians. But they REFUSE to countenance keeping God’s Laws – Yeshua’s light yoke of Torah. Torah means instructions – it’s how to live a righteous and healthy life and have a good and healthy society. All of this is rejected, not based on the words of Christ, but on the misinterpreted words of Paul.

Success in keeping the law is not required for salvation, but let’s be clear, if:

Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. Matt 5:19

can you tell me where the folks will be who say that all the law is done away with? There is nowhere beneath the least in heaven, is there? Yeshua tells us:

Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of lawlessness!’ Matt 7:22-23

lawlessness.jpg

Finally, this all begs the question what exactly Christians are repenting of, and why? Sin is transgression of the Law (1 John 3:4), and so if you don’t study the Law how can you even know what you’ve done which is wrong in the eyes of God?

Repent, and obey.

God Bless you

Lis