What is Selah here for?

There are two plans for your life – one is God’s plan, and one is Satan’s. I want to use this blog to bring you the best and most inspiring stories – good news – and I also want to share with you what I can see of Satan’s plan in action – because we must be as wise as serpents, and as harmless as doves. That is the bad news, and you need to know it.

So there’s good news, and there’s bad news. I hope you’ll stick around for all of it, and remember to take a moment to click on Good News before you leave – top yourself up with something joyful before you go!

God Bless you

Lis

Selah – ‘pause and calmly think of that!’

Why would I suggest that you ‘pause, and calmly think of that!’?

Selah is a word used frequently in the Psalms to tell you to do just that – what you just read – think about it – take your time! Let it sink in!

God wants to reach you daily through His Word – so take some time in the scriptures to do this – read, then Selah!

I hope you have a wonderful day!

God Bless you!

Lis

State sanctioned lies, sickness and depravity

Just when you thought that the sewer couldn’t be any more caked in filth, this is the latest from my government in the UK: (Link)

gender blah 1

Yes, you don’t even have to admit to your doctor that you’re questioning your gender – no one will disabuse you of your foolishness, and you (clearly) don’t even need to be transitioning medically – in other words, just as my dear American friends have already found to your cost, men with big hairy chests, and winkies can say they’re women. How much longer before the foolish UK embraces the Target philosophy of letting perverts into women’s bathrooms?

Here’s a quote from there:

“It comes after Prime Minister Theresa May earlier this week suggested she was preparing to reform the Gender Recognition Act, saying that ‘when it comes to rights and protections for trans people, there is still a long way to go’.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said May would have his support if she allowed transpeople to ‘self-identify’ their gender.

He said legislation could be passed with Labour’s backing, despite the prime minster’s deal with the socially conservative DUP.”

Yes the DUP might not stand with this agenda (for an agenda it is!). In fact I’d go so far as to alter Mrs (Dis)May’s quote and say:

‘when it comes to the agenda to push lies, sickness, and depravity, there is still a long way to go.’

Because that is truly what she must surely mean.

What struck me most, as is so often, were the comments. One of the most stunning comments I think I have ever read in the DM is the third one here from a chap in China:

gender blah

He says “I live in China and I can assure you all expats here are 100% sane…. as is the government! I expect lots of red arrows but I couldn’t live under the Junta you guys do.”

Did you get that – an ex-pat living in China feels that our system of government is unbearable to live under. I share his sentiments, and I look forward to the day when (God willing) I get to leave this country for a simpler life away from the Cultural Marxists of Britain (and the rest of Europe).

However, in amongst the top comments there was also a gem for those of us who still retain a (fairly black) sense of humour:

gender blah 2

God does not make mistakes. Those who think they are something they are not are fooling themselves. Those who go further and destroy the body God gave them commit an offence towards the creator. Those parents who allow, foster and connive with their children’s silliness are especially evil.

I’d say God help my country – but His wrath is being poured out and only repentance will suffice to turn it away. That repentance is not coming anytime soon, and the continuing storm of stupidity, evil and lies is here.

God Bless you

Lis

Of doctors and death

In the latest twist in the case of Charlie Gard it seems that yet again his parents have been thwarted in their attempts to take him to the US for treatment. I want to discuss a little about the rights of children, and how all this nasty debacle seems to have happened.

As things currently stand, while you are pregnant you have the right to abort/kill/murder/evict that child from your uterus (depending on your viewpoint). Currently a woman can do this without the consent of her partner, even though his sexual act with her involved her consent. Hmmm.

But once your child is born and REGISTERED (the crucial part is that fact) they are effectively owned by the state. Your rights as a parent end there. A child who is registered has rights which are separate from the parents. So if a parent is a Christian, and the state disapproves of the way the child is being raised the child can be taken away. This happened to a Norwegian couple not long ago.

Your rights as a parent do not extend to knowing that your child has been given contraception by their school while they are underage. Your rights as a parent do not extend to denying them transgender enabling treatments until they are adults. No, the state assumes the right to step in, and effectively destroy the child’s life by allowing such evil and stupidity to reign.

You, as a parent, have very few rights at all.

Oh, unless you’re one of the hundreds of parents in the UK involved in female genital mutilation (FGM) of your muslim or African daughters, then the state will just tell you it’s not a good thing, and your child will not be taken away, not protected, nor the parent prosecuted. Satan is the god of this world, in case you had a moment of surprise and wonder as to why this might be!

Another issue in this case is one a friend highlighted to me, and I think it’s worth mentioning. I was talking to him about this case of Charlie Gard, and he said that it’s important for doctors to take this court route to stop other parents questioning everything they do. My immediate reaction was to say that they MUST question everything – as doctors often get things wrong, and never know the patient like their family do.

I have not forgotten the surprise of my father’s hospital consultant when told that Dad was still happily chopping logs at aged 80. No doctor would expect that – they are mostly too young to have any real idea of the world let alone the lives of their patients when not presenting in a state of ill-health. Remember that 130,000 elderly a year are (and I’ll say ‘are’ because the Liverpool Care Pathway has never ceased to be used, but it has ceased to be named as that). Doctors who don’t know elderly patients are very happy to write them off as incapable of a life worth living. Doctors are killers! What with abortion, euthanasia (which is what the LCP was and is) and organ theft (murder). Doctors are killers. Tragic but true (and these are only direct examples, the drugs kill far more).

And that’s the other issue here. Apart from the fact that Great Ormond Street Hospital have some kind of desire to play god with this child’s life – their desire is clearly to decide his fate regardless of any treatment that another medical team CAN do for him – the arrogance is astounding! Apart from that fact is the dangerous issue of Charlie’s ‘rights’. If Charlie has rights which do not chime with his parents obvious pro-life views, then he clearly has a ‘right to death’ – a dangerous precedent. The courts, who do not know Charlie, nor love him, and the doctors who want to play god to ensure they are in charge, in control of this little life separate from his parents – they want to decide the rights of this child for DEATH! His parents want him to have a chance of LIFE!

So children’s rights are a gateway to all kinds of nastiness dressed up as ‘progress’ – whereas, in the main, parents love their children, and want them to live, and be healthy and cared for.

Lastly let me be clear that whilst the medical profession are the only people on earth allowed to claim they can cure cancer, they do so by promoting chemotherapy which kills 25% of patients, is ineffective in 97% of cancer cases, and has now been shown to spread cancer throughout the body. Doctors and pharmakeia are the work of the devil. Beware!

Go to God, or ask the devil?

Yet today I read of a case of a child with brain damage who has been healed quite spectacularly with simple hyperbaric oxygen therapy. After 40 sessions this little girl is almost back to 100%! Read more here: Link

Oxygen is a supplement – it’s a natural substance, and there’s no money in it for Big (P)harma. No wonder, as with hemp for cancer, they continue to want their very profitable treatments which kill to remain the ‘standard of care’ (death).

May God bless you this Shabbat. Praise YHWH for His goodness. Stay close to Him in these troubling and difficult times. And please pray for Charlie Gard and his parents who have fought so hard for his right to life!

Lis

Charlie Gard and family granted US citizenship

charlie gard.jpg

Thank you, America, for giving this child and his family a chance to get out of the clutches of Great Ormond Street Hospital and the courts that wish to prevent his further treatment. I hope now that GOSH will be forced to release him so that he can get over to America for treatment.

It is vital that we do not forget that prayer is the very best hope this little boy has – and we must also remember that the medical fraternity are not godly.

However, these parents should never have had their rights as parents infringed upon by the state and the courts. It should be a case of their child, and their choice – otherwise, whatever next? You’re seeing it already in California with mandatory vaccination.

The government do not know what’s best for this child, or any other (that’s a laughable notion, in fact), and whilst only God knows truly what is best, these parents must now, surely, be set free to take their child to doctors who have hopes for his LIFE and not his death!

You can read the rest of the Daily Mail article here: Link

Please pray for Charlie, his family and the whole situation.

God Bless you

Lis

My letter to my MP regarding organ donation opt out system

A note to you – would you please write to your MP and voice your concerns about this bill?

I wrote to my MP this morning, and thought I would share what I wrote to him with you.

Dear Mr Hancock,

I am writing to you with regard to a Private Members Bill which, I understand, is about to be presented in the House of Commons (according to this article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ health/article-4704718/My-new- lungs-don-t-work-more.html).

I have written urgently to Dan Jarvis MP, and now I am writing also to you, as my MP, to share my very great disquiet.

Informed consent is the basis for everything that is done in the way of treatment (and the withdrawal of treatment) within the NHS. However, no one has ever given informed consent to be an organ donor. Organ donation requires the donor to be alive when their organs are removed. They must still have full respiration, a beating heart etc. in order for their organs to be usable. There have been numerous cases of patients who heard doctors discuss the harvesting of their organs, and who regained consciousness and later fully recovered from their injuries. Those cases are chilling in themselves, but the plain matter of law is the matter of informed consent.

If the public do not understand that they will be alive, not cold and blue as they believe, when those organs are removed, then the continuation of the organ donor system as it stands now is based on deception!

I’ll give you an example that I also shared with Mr Jarvis:

I asked a couple of my friends whether they were on the organ donor register, and they both said no. I said to them, “Well don’t go on it.” They asked why, and I simply asked them ‘Would you like an anaesthetic when your organs are removed?” They said, “But why would I need one, I’d be dead?”

There you have the public’s understanding of organ donation in a nutshell.

Yet the government is now considering moving to an opt out system of presumed consent, which worse, not only denies most people who are ambivalent about the decision a choice, but will also ensure the continuation of the public’s ignorance of the facts of organ donation.

Let me reiterate – the public believe they will be dead in the common understanding of that word when their organs are removed. Doctors know that organs from the dead cannot be used, and so have invented new definitions of death in order to get these organs. How can this be anything other than deception, Mr Hancock?

I ask you to stand against this new bill, which I believe is a crime against the British people.

Yours sincerely

Mrs Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx

Having written to Dan Jarvis MP, and now Matthew Hancock MP, I will of course share any responses I recieve on this matter.

God Bless you

Lis

The Advertising Standards Authority are now social engineers

Yes, the ASA, who are responsible for making sure that advertising is not misleading, are now branching out into social engineering (for which they are not qualified!). This article from the Daily Mail states: (Link)

Traditional portrayals of housewives are to be banned from advertisements in a crackdown on sexist stereotypes by watchdogs.

Depictions of women being solely responsible for cooking, cleaning and childcare in commercials will disappear.

But at the same time, it will become wrong to suggest only men are capable of doing DIY or are useless when it comes to chores and caring for babies.

The changes come from the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which argues that these stereotypes are limiting the aspirations of both women and men.

So it’s sexist for a woman to be in the kitchen cooking (we mustn’t offend the feminazis, must we?), yet what is clear to those of us who can think is that the removal of this ‘stereotype’ is JUST as much a limitation of girls aspirations! In fact of course, it’s a satanic subversion of everything which God says is right, pure and proper.

In case any of your are in doubt on my views on this (as a woman) – God’s blueprint for me is clear – I was created to be a helpmeet to a man. That was what He created Eve for, and that’s what He created me for too. He did not make me to be a CEO, but I could still be a CEO, if I could do that without compromising the role He created me for. To care for and nurture a husband and family is what God created women for.

The ASA wants to play its part in finally doing away with that. When organisations, whose main purpose is to make sure that misleading claims are not made for a product or service, start interfering with the structure of advertisements for a, frankly, satanic agenda, they’ve gone too far!

The public are entitled to see ‘traditional’ depictions of women and men, just as we are forced to tolerate seeing transgender women in advertisements for mother’s day! (Makes me glad I don’t watch television anymore!)

It is simply wrong to allow one, and yet deny the other. It is clear that satan’s agenda rolls on…

advert comment 1

God Bless you

Lis

Opt-out system for organ donation is a crime against the people of this country

A private member’s bill is about to go before parliament, to change the law regarding our current system of organ donation. Currently in England, you have to opt in to donate your organs, but presumed consent, which is the system now in Wales, is what this private member’s bill hopes to bring in. The public are in raptures over this – they are delighted to think that after they are cold and dead their organs can be given to someone else to help them live – this is the public’s perception of organ donation. It is a false belief – it is consent on the basis of ignorance. It is based on, in fact, deception. I’ve written about it many times. It ought to be a scandal, but the media won’t rock the boat of this system.

So the MP who is presenting the bill is called Dan Jarvis, so this morning I wrote to him, and this is what I said:

Dear Mr Jarvis,

I see from this article (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4704718/My-new-lungs-don-t-work-more.html), that you are about to present a Private Members Bill in the House of Commons regarding the introduction of an opt out system for organ donation.

Are you aware, Mr Jarvis, that no one has ever given informed consent to be an organ donor? The public firmly believe they will be dead when their organs are removed. Dead by the definition that all the public understands. Cold, blue, and no longer with any function in their bodies. The medical profession and government have done nothing to disabuse the public of this false notion – in fact without it, the organ donation system as it stands could not have come into being at all. The public is incapable of giving consent to be an organ donor, because if they knew that they would be alive – with a pulse, respiration, a beating heart etc. they would never give their consent.

Informed consent is a basic tenet of all medical treatment (and also it’s withdrawal). Yet this is not being followed in the case of organ donation.

This must come to an end, and I call on you to stop this private members bill from proceeding on the basis that it is legally flawed to presume consent, when informed consent on the basis of truth, information etc. has never been obtained from a single donor, let alone the general public.

Lastly, I leave you with this. I asked a couple of my friends whether they were on the organ donor register, and they both said no. I said to them, “Well don’t go on it.” They asked why, and I simply asked them ‘Would you like an anaesthetic when your organs are removed?” They said, “But why would I need one, I’d be dead?”

There you have the public’s understanding of organ donation in a nutshell.

It is very easy to obtain many hundreds of thousands of signatures on a petition to bring in an opt out system for organ donation when all those signing believe they will be cold and dead when those organs are removed. They are in such deep ignorance of the facts – facts so abhorrent that they are difficult to even broach – yet as lawmakers it is your duty to work on the basis of truth.

I hope that my letter reaches you in time to prevent a crime against the people of this country.

Yours sincerely

Mrs Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx

The thing which is most sickening of all is how the press push this crime by writing mawkish stories about the need for organs. The article linked in the letter above was one such piece. The comments were classic of the uninformed:

organs.jpg

organs 2

Please share this far and wide – the public has to know the truth. I cannot sit idly by and do nothing while I see a crime being perpetrated. It’s bad enough that such awful crimes have been going on since 1967, but we can still awake from the lies and deception, and we can say no more!

On the issue of sick people’s need for organs, by the way, I am not without feeling for these folks. But I bet if they knew the person who was ‘donating’ their organs (having them stolen without consent), was going to be alive, they would refuse to accept them. I would hope so.

God Bless you

Lis