There are two plans for your life – one is God’s plan, and one is Satan’s. I want to use this blog to bring you the best and most inspiring stories – good news – and I also want to share with you what I can see of Satan’s plan in action – because we must be as wise as serpents, and as harmless as doves. That is the bad news, and you need to know it.
So there’s good news, and there’s bad news. I hope you’ll stick around for all of it, and remember to take a moment to click on Good News before you leave – top yourself up with something joyful before you go!
Oh for shame! This story is heartbreaking. Shame on the council – SHAME on them! To take away a homeless person’s only source of warmth and protection – it goes beyond mere indifference, doesn’t it? Link
A 66-year-old homeless man found dead in a town centre allegedly had his sleeping bag taken away by the local council days before.
The rough sleeper, known only as ‘Kev’, was found under a flyover in a car park in Bournemouth, Dorset, yards from the council’s offices.
Kev’s body was discovered by a friend who claims Bournemouth Borough Council had ‘removed his sleeping bag and possessions’ from the site during a recent tidy-up.
Previously, the council has come under fire for playing bagpipe music throughout the night to stop homeless people sleeping at the town’s bus and railway station.
They were also criticised for buying one-way tickets for rough sleepers to leave the town.
The unnamed friend, who had known ‘Kev’ for 18 months, said: ‘I put my hand on him to shake him and that’s when I knew something was wrong and my heart sank.
‘A couple of weeks ago he said the council took his sleeping bag.
‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.’
God speaks to us in Matthew 25: 31-43:
31 “When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy[c] angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. 33 And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35 for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me in; 36 I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was in prison and you came to Me.’
37 “Then the righteous will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You drink? 38 When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39 Or when did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 And the King will answer and say to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these My brethren, you did it to Me.’
41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’
44 “Then they also will answer Him,[d] saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” [NKJV]
I can only ask (I think I can guess), because the front page of the Daily Mail is full of the “threat from Putin”, which is NO THREAT AT ALL!
When you read the contents however, it is clearly a plea from a military man for more money for the military (and in the case of the UK this is justified as we have cut military spending to laughable levels). He is using Russia as an excuse to increase spending, and the media have grabbed onto his words as being meaningful (for propaganda purposes!). I quote: (Link)
Using the dire warning to make the case for more money for the armed forces, General Carter said:
Britain could scale back its military withdrawal from Germany to allow personnel to race to Eastern Europe if war breaks out;
Syria’s civil war was exploited by Moscow to get its troops combat-ready while testing long-range missiles and other equipment;
Russia’s conventional forces give it a ‘calculable military advantage’;
Hostile action would be hard to predict and the time to address the threats was now.
General Carter’s major speech came as experts issued their own warnings about the threat from Russia and the need for Britain to spend more on defence.
I believe that General Carter is, perhaps, a man with limited knowledge of the causes of the conflict in Syria, which is based more on Moscow’s desire to sell oil to Europe (which the Saudi’s don’t want, as they have their own pipeline they are planning). America has backed the Arabs over our white brethren in Russia! Shame on them!
The battle over the pipelines also shows that the lives of military men are worth nothing in comparison to power over the supply of oil (now what was that about the environment and pollution?). They don’t care how many are killed as long as there is no competition lowering the price of oil.
Instead of speaking the truth, the media lies and tells us that Russia is a threat (a threat only to Arab oil interests and the elite’s puppets like ISIS!).
Thankfully the British public aren’t buying any of it! And no we are NOT going to fight our brethren in Russia – NEVER! The top comments on the article give me great hope – in the top ten there is not one which supports the propaganda given to us:
As one astute commenter above says “…why have the DM been told to put this out? What is it that’s happening that the Government wishes to distract us from?
That’s a very good question, and one we ought to consider. Russia is the media’s current “bogeyman”, and the British public no longer fears it – we’ve grown up, and we know we don’t want to fight people who have never attacked us.
My message to the elites – NO WE WILL NOT FIGHT THE RUSSIANS – WE LOVE THEM!
This really sums up the West’s relationship with Islam. I saw today that a Primary School has been forced into an embarrassed climb-down over it’s recent rule change which prohibited the wearing of the hijab (headscarf) for girls aged under eight years old.
The ban was imposed before Christmas to help five- and six-year-olds integrate better after staff noticed they were often reluctant to join in playground games because their headscarves were cumbersome. The campaign against the ban gathered momentum last week after locals began a petition opposing it, and Islamic activists and Left-wing Newham councillors criticised the decision.
How interesting I thought, because I recall only a few months ago that a £2Million campaign by Transport for London was scrapped after it showed a child aged 3-4 years old wearing, you guessed it, the hijab: (Link)
So which is it, Islam? You say that the hijab is bad on a small child because this makes it look as though they should be covered (i.e. they are old enough for men to look at), and then you demand that small children should be covered in school, why exactly?
Because your religion is perverse? Let’s face it, you either have a law related to this or you don’t! Is it because Islam brings out in you a desire to mess the British people around for the fun of it? Why is it one rule when you say so and another rule, yet again, when you say so?
What will Britain be like when they become the majority? It will be filled with just such hypocrisy, I expect, and the minority white population will be told how high to jump and be expected to do it. I do so hope that I will not be resident in the UK by then.
Well, let me tell you, they can, and they have. Thanks to the NHS (which is apparently NOT in crisis if this nonsense is anything to go by).
So men, who don’t have cervixes, and who claim to be women, will be offered screening for something they don’t have, but women who do have breasts and cervixes (unless they have gender reassignment surgery) will not be offered screening for either?!
This is some convoluted thinking – and remember someone (a whole committee of people, I expect) was paid good money to think up this nonsense.
I quote from the Daily Mail article above: (Link) [emphasis added]
Women who believe they are men are not being offered routine NHS screening for breast and cervical cancer amid fears that it might offend them.
But astonishingly, an official guidebook states that men living as women are being invited for cervical smear tests – even though they do not have a cervix.
The advice, spelt out in a 24-page booklet published by Public Health England, was last night described as politically correct ‘lunacy’ which was putting lives at risk. […]
The PHE booklet, NHS Screening Programmes – Information For Trans People, ‘explains who we invite for screening’.
Trans people who register with their GP as being their birth sex will automatically be invited to screening appropriate to that.
But if they register as their ‘new’ gender, they will not be.
So if a trans man – who was born female – registers as male, he ‘won’t be invited for breast screening’ at 50.
Likewise, it tells those born as girls: ‘If you are registered with a GP as male, you won’t be invited for cervical screening.’
Most trans men do not have their wombs removed – only a small number have full sex-change surgery.
However, if a trans woman – born male – ‘registers as female, you will be routinely invited for cervical screening’.
Trans health adviser Aedan Wolton, who features in a related NHS Choices video, said smear tests could be uncomfortable for ‘trans masculine people’ – born female – as it challenged how they perceived themselves.
‘This is unsurprising as the experience is often a very gendered one; from the waiting room, to the words used during the smear, it is often a procedure designed for women,’ he writes in an accompanying blog.
Conservative MP David Davies, who has campaigned against Government plans to let people legally ‘self-identify’ their own gender, said: ‘This NHS effort to be politically correct is putting the lives of women who claim to be men at risk.’
It was also ‘wasting the time of men who claim to be women by offering them tests for organs they do not have’.
Why is the state – already cash-strapped, or so it tell us (whilst never running out of money for bombs, I might add) humouring these adults, these deluded people? This is beyond the scope of the state’s role, and is, surely for each individual to navigate with their health provider, but no – we must have guidance in place, we must have procedures, and we must play along with these tragic, suicide prone and wrong-thinking people who have rejected themselves. The state and the cash-strapped NHS is now enabling this charade to continue!
The comments from the public give some hope – even after moderating the comments the top few were these:
The tragedy of the trans movement is that it is driven by a belief that somehow “otherness” is what will make them feel better. That the grass is greener in the other gender, or that they even know what it means to feel what the other gender is feeling. That is wrong – you don’t know what a woman feels and changing how you look will never make you a woman. You are simply trying to modify your physical body to conform to something many Christians recognise as demonic oppression – it’s not who you really are.
You are not born into the wrong body because God does not make mistakes. Ultimately the rejection of self which trans people are suffering from is a form of body dysmorphia. They don’t like how they look because it doesn’t chime with how they feel inside – this phenomenon happens to people who go on to have a lot of plastic surgery, but we don’t say of those people that they are brave, or that they are becoming their true selves, we recognise their illness for what it is – a rejection of their true self.
The true self of the trans person can never be who they become – it is who they were born. Something which has gone awry in their thinking, in their feelings, and perhaps opened a door to demonic oppression as well has simply skewed their mirror – distorted how they see themselves and created an unfillable void of longing for something which God never intended them to have. Sadly, even post surgery, these people are at massively greater risk of suicide – because the fact is the grass is not greener in the other gender, and becoming something else doesn’t solve the desire to become something else – you were you to start with.
It is bad enough that these folks have a problem which medicine and surgery cannot solve, it is worse that the state is now spending money trying to align itself with such behaviour. We must, finally, recognise again the branch, which is Cultural Marxism (satanism by another name) which supports this fragmentation of society for its own dark aims. The root – the only enemy we have (and it’s the same enemy the trans folks have too) – is satan himself.
Resist the devil and he will flee from you, we are told in James 4:7 – this statement is as true for the Christian battling besetting sin as it is for the trans person considering changing sex.
What a weird media-created ideology we see in our society these days. We are being nudged by the media, by corporations and by our governments, and towards what exactly? These three articles were featured on the Daily Mail in the last few days – each one sends a prominent message to the person scrolling down the page. These are “important articles” – yet a familiar theme emerges:
What have we become? What are we intended to become, and who is behind this trend to destroy masculinity? If you click on the article link here, you can see it is not just white males getting this treatment. It’s easy to mock this and say it’s the exception – so why does the media shove it in our faces? They are normalising this weirdness for a reason.
This white couple welcomed their new cat with rather disturbing photo shoot. It made some folks laugh, and it made others very uncomfortable – what we can clearly recognise here, however, is the message: Pets NOT children. Pets are not your heritage. Pets are not the future of your family, let alone your race. This is disturbing for reasons these folks can’t even comprehend. (Link)
Why is this even news? That’s a good question – I believe it is “news” because the couple are mixed race. Mixed race couples are very popular ALL the time on the Daily Mail. Mum gets a haircut, and the next thing she’s on the front page of the Daily Mail? Nope, this can’t be right! (Link)
The western world, the western culture and the white race are being systematically destroyed. We aren’t even allowed to mention it though – this guy did (he’s Italian) and now it’s a “racism row”? For speaking the truth? (Link)
Whites must wake up before we can stand up – before we can decide to fight we must realise that the enemy isn’t the immigrant who is being foisted on us, and often onto our welfare system, but the leaders who have made the Kalergi Plan their agenda behind closed doors. No one voted for you, elites – we never said yes, and we’ve never consented to be genocided. We don’t want to dilute and destroy our racial heritage, anymore than blacks like Mohammed Ali, who was also against interracial marriage. Wise man!
Here’s a quote from another very wise black man:
We know why this is happening – it is a judgement of God upon us. Waking up isn’t enough, standing up isn’t enough, and fighting will get us nowhere without God on our side. The infiltration of our countries, our cultures and the education system by Marxists hell-bent on our destruction is the branch, but not the root. To strike at the root of this cultural malaise, we have to turn back to God.
A couple of weeks ago this headline grabbed my attention, and I screen-grabbed it. I wasn’t sure what I was going to write. My main thoughts and feelings about it were that “This is what you elected him for, America!” and a general “Woo-hoo!”
It all seemed to be good news – yes some griping as always from the media, but money in the pockets of hard-working Americans, and more jobs for other hard-working Americans is exactly what America needs!
And now here we are, with headlines proclaiming that some nasty little journalist has written an explosive book proclaiming that everyone who knows Trump thinks he’s an idiot. How fascinating!
I find it particularly fascinating because somewhere, I assume, he has a speechwriter who makes him sound like a genius when he says (and does) all the right things to get the US back on track. That speechwriter also thinks he’s a moron? Then he and the other puppet masters should be ashamed of themselves. Surely if you worked for a president who is such a moron you would decide on principle to resign?! Funny how these people who he claims to have interviewed have never spoken out before. Can you imagine how elated any press journalist would have been to receive a tip-off that Trump is a moron?!
Well of course the press has been saying this for years. All through the campaign they tried to call him out as just that, yet not only has he won, but he has also accomplished more in his first year in office to boost America than Obama did in eight (that would be, of course, because Obama’s mandate was to destroy the US, as anyone who can recognise a Marxist when they see one, knows).
Trump is not a Marxist. I think Mr Wolff night be one, what do you think?
This telling quote really nailed it for me:
When asked about what impact he expected the book would have, he said: ‘We will end this presidency now.’ (source)
We? Who’s we, Mr Wolff?
I more strongly suspect that this man will indeed be silenced in a very public way by one of the most litigious men on earth – Donald Trump. What Michael Wolff has done, in my view, is utterly immoral. I may moan about how evil Theresa May is, but I wouldn’t publish a book about it, with (as a caveat) a note that it might not all be true. I quote:
The author of the explosive new book about Donald Trump’s presidency acknowledged in an author’s note that he wasn’t certain all of its content was true.
Michael Wolff, the author of “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” included a note at the start that casts significant doubt on the reliability of the specifics contained in the rest of its pages.
Several of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradicted those of others.
But some were nonetheless included in the vivid account of the West Wing’s workings, in a process Wolff describes as “allowing the reader to judge” whether the sources’ claims are true. (source)
The left are very good at attacking the character of those they disagree with – it’s a known method of the left to silence the opposition. The fact that the Daily Mail has joined in with such unabashed glee doesn’t surprise me – another mouthpiece for the elites!
Will this book end Trump’s presidency? No, it won’t. Will it result in the absolute destruction of Michael Wolff’s career. I suspect so. As one commenter pointed out, this guy Wolff will be crowd-funding his defence before too long. MAGA!