Is Covid-19 a novel disease?

We have been reacting to this “coronavirus” pandemic as if we understand what it is – this NYC Emergency physician has a different opinion. He is saying that the protocols medics are using currently are harming rather than helping patients because this is a new disease which requires a totally new approach – one which he wants medical researchers to look into urgently. I’m going to put all three of his videos up here – please watch them and share them – this is important information.

God Bless you



Every house built today has a set of plans – someone has spent a long time designing with practicality (we hope) in mind. Every service to our homes must also be routed wisely, and the builder of the house must be able to read and understand those plans in order to end up with a house which is both structurally sound and pleasing (we hope!) to the eye.

Functionality is built into every recipe we use. We know who can be trusted to produce reliable recipes, and we follow those recipes carefully, more or less, to ensure good results which are delicious and healthy (we hope!).

But of course, just as there are different people there are different tastes. Different architects design different styles of homes, and different cooks produce different recipes. Having said that, some basic principles apply: there are structural laws that must be applied to buildings to make them safe, whatever their intended appearance on the outside, and there are also structural principles in things like bread and cake baking which must also be applied for consistent results. If you vary the proportions, they simply won’t work, and although that sponge cake may taste OK, if the consistency is more like a hockey puck, good luck trying to persuade anyone to make it a second time.

And so when I look at the area of health I wonder why there is really no one way. Just one way which works for all humans – there really isn’t! Whilst, of course, I am biased towards and keep God’s dietary laws – they are really quite easy and were one of the earliest changes I made in my walk with God, when it comes to health beyond that I am in flux.

You see, in my body, damage has been done – and I don’t know how far back this goes. I don’t know how long ago my gut trouble started. I do know when it got worse, and I do know that antibiotics were the culprit (and what dealt with the sepsis I was experiencing). It’s awful to think that there is no one right way to deal with the issue – there are, however, many people who will tell you what worked for them (and many who denounce these people as being wrong (because it didn’t work for them)).

You see I like to have a plan. I can bake without a recipe, and often do, but in order to do something I’ve never done before, I need a recipe to know how to do it, and practice to become proficient. Just as many builders could, in theory, build an extension for you without a plan, because they’ve done it so often, they had to learn how, and follow plans many times (and of course, they require plans where planning consent is required anyway).

But with my gut journey I feel as though I just keep finding myself at the end of a cul-de-sac and having to turn around and go back. The only things I have discovered along the way is that eating basically is best – natural food with as few additives as possible. But what annoys my gut this week might not next, and more annoyingly, what doesn’t annoy my gut today may well annoy it tomorrow.

So I’m saying all this to say this: we have a blueprint for our society which God wrote Himself for our benefit. With it I know what is right and wrong, and I know what I can and cannot do. I know my rights and responsibilities, if you like. I love God’s Law! Without that blueprint, we have a society where everyone does what is right in their own eyes – and the church teaches obedience, but what to?

A teaching from yesterday, which I’ll put at the end of this post, brought up some good points, and one relates to Romans 1: [emphasis added]

22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.

24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.

That last verse makes clear that they knew the law and the judgement of God according to it, yet not only did they practice these wicked things, but approved of them who also did so! Today the church teaches that the Law of Moses is done away with, and so, without God’s blueprint all these things become permissible – what is there to stop witchcraft if the Law is gone? The church now embraces sins which God abhors because they want to build a house which is not structurally sound? They don’t even know what they are doing. God does, and did when He caused Israel to suffer as they sinned – bringing them back to Him in repentance and bringing order (His Law) back to their society. Without that blueprint all kinds of wickedness prevailed! Things which are now infiltrating the church are part of that.

So you see why I wish there was one blueprint for my health recovery – one single route which I could follow! But that is not part of God’s Law, and so I have to try to work it out prayerfully with Him, working out what I must deny myself for my health’s sake, and what I can have and when. How much easier it is to follow a proven plan – why on earth does the church continue to reject God’s?

God Bless you


70 years of the NHS – how times have changed

This fascinating article offers us a glimpse into the world of the NHS in the years after it was founded in 1948.

NHS 1948.jpg


This picture in particular caught my eye:

kneeling to pray NHS
Nurses kneel to pray in Leeds in 1956

How times have changed (and not for the better in some regards).

I will say my local GPs surgery is incredibly efficient, and my GP is an absolute star (best GP I’ve ever had). I’ll say that getting an appointment is easy, and generally things run pretty smoothly. All the appointments and referrals I’ve had have also been pretty quick and efficient (within 3 months). The NHS has moved with the times and with the growth of population in the main. However, in my own case, no matter how efficient the NHS has been, I will give God all the credit for obtaining my treatment – you’ll see why I say that in a minute!

You see somewhere along the line, in the last 70 years, the NHS got an infestation of parasites. These parasites have become so embedded into it that most doctors simply recite the mantras they were taught by them – “this symptoms requires this drug.” You can see where I’m going – yes the (p)Harmaceutical industry has targeted the NHS, even using the mainstream media to push its agenda to mop up every spare penny the country can spend on “medicine.” This has only added to the terrible burden of illness which the country faces – everything from depression to “fibromyalgia” can now be medicated but not cured. There are very few medications that cure anything, beyond antibiotics. Yet there are many things which can be cured and are missed because doctors see a symptom and they think of a drug, not an underlying deficiency.

Take vitamin B12 deficiency for example. It is often misdiagnosed. Here are just a few of the conditions the NHS spends millions to mask with drugs or other ineffective treatments and which can be caused by vitamin B12 deficiency:


You can read the rest of the article and see his costing figures (savings figures really!) here: Link

You can quickly see that by masking the symptoms the NHS is only making a bad situation worse. As each year goes by, the patient is not going to recover through medications because their deficiency remains untreated – leading it to get worse and worse. But, the chances of getting those little ampoules of vitamin B12 are very slim for many.

I was blessed and protected by God to receive the treatment – many are not so fortunate. Some get a little but not enough, and some never get it at all because their GP won’t listen to them or study the information necessary. They aren’t taught enough about it in medical school, and we’re back to those parasites again.

The parasites don’t want an NHS that benefits the nation’s health, they want an NHS that provides them with a handsome income and “customers” for life. The more socialised the medicine the more likely this is to happen, in my view, because we don’t know the real cost of any of the medications we take for the most part! I have heard that my ampoules of B12 cost sixty pence each. This means that the prescription charge just about covers the cost of them each month. Most medications cost far more because they are patented and therefore Big Harma has the monopoly and can charge what it likes! If patients had to pay for these medicines themselves we would quickly see a change in attitudes to the (p)harmaceutical industry all round! Patients would never stand for it! They would ask for something cheaper and the industry would be forced to reduce prices.

So a wonderful system set up to improve the nation’s health has become subverted – and chronic sickness and disease is the result.

There are simple forms of screening which produce a complex picture, and B12 deficiency is one of them (thyroid screening is another) – sadly many doctors would rather treat symptoms than look deeper and give their patients back their real health! They honestly don’t know how to! And yet that was what the service was set up to do – now it’s failing, over run with managers and far too expensive for the country to manage.

It’s time to get back to basics, and to strengthen the preventative side of medicine – emphasise exercise, fresh air and healthy diet (and added vitamins if needed) instead of a pill for all ills – because as we can clearly see, the country is not getting healthier on those.

Read more:

Big Pharma, Pharmakeia and what it means

Go to God, or ask the devil?

God Bless you



Would you help me please?

Over the last few months I have suffered worse and worse symptoms – I really had no idea why things were only getting worse when I was trying so hard to be healthy. I kept fiddling with my diet, and I kept blaming one or two ingredients, and yet somehow excluding them didn’t solve the problem. My balance was getting worse, and I was suffering from brain fog, muscle weakness and light- headedness as well. I was due to see my GP about my iron levels – just a check up, but I felt God telling me to tell him about my muscle weakness too. Then on the day I was due to see him, I had the word B12 come into my head – vitamin B12.

I went to look at symptoms of B12 deficiency, and noticed a few familiar things (tingling hands and feet for example). I didn’t have much time and didn’t dig deeply into the subject, but spoke to the GP about that and the weakness. He arranged blood tests and referred me for a scan as well to be sure.

Amazingly, the right information came to me when I came home and dug more deeply – my goodness, I thought, I’ve had some of these symptoms for years! When I thought back, I realised that some of the neurological effects of B12 deficiency (which are very serious, and should NOT be ignored) I had been experiencing for over a decade. I was horrified.

When I spoke to the GP again, he was curious about what I was saying and decided to refer me to a gastroenterologist. This is because I seem to have absorption issues for iron too (probably celiac). This was a step in the right direction, but I continued to decline, and the symptoms seemed to be overwhelming.

Evidence in hand I went back to the GP and spoke to him – bless him, he agreed to start treatment straight away, even though I won’t see the gastroenterologist for another two months. The injections have just begun, and I can already feel some changes in my balance, which is such a blessing.

So I am urging you to please share this link far and wide:

I guarantee you need to know what B12 deficiency is, if not for yourself, then for others, and don’t be like me, on the floor almost before anything is done!

I also ask you please to help me out. Over the last few months I have got into debt. This is partly due to the weather affecting my work (pesky winter), but also due to these symptoms which made me reluctant to get out – even walking about is hard when you feel like you are floating. I have become quite isolated, and although the debt is not huge it is a stress I could do without while I am recovering. I have set up a youcaring page, and I hope you will contribute and share, and if you can’t help in that way, please pray for me instead. Thank you!

Help Lis bounce back from severe Vitamin B12 deficiency!

To be able to concentrate on getting well without the weight of debt hanging over me would be wonderful at this point. I also ask you to share so that the issue of Vitamin B12 deficiency can be highlighted. It’s so often misdiagnosed! If it’s misdiagnosed the symptoms may be “treated”, but the underlying cause will continue to worsen. This issue needs more attention from all of us.

God Bless you



Happy New Year!

I am so excited about 2017 – what a year 2016 was, and what God did for me in that time! With that in mind, I feel so buoyed up about 2017! I hope that 2017 is good for you, and that your needs are met, and your relationship with God is closer than ever by the end of it!

I’m just including a few of the best memes I’ve seen and grabbed off Twitter this last few months. I hope they make you think (Selah!) and inspire you.

Think good thoughts (read the Word!)
Be ready to act to protect others
Take responsibility for your health
Realise that (p)harmacy doesn’t have the answer
Thank you for those standing up against Islam
Be in awe
God’s word is TRUTH!
God answers prayer!
You cannot save everyone, but try
Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS)

Please consider sharing articles from this blog – specifically on South Africa and on organ donation – these two subjects need a wider audience. Please pray for this to happen – you can help save lives!

God Bless you


The invisible sticking plaster of prayer

I wrote this a couple of months ago, and left it in my drafts folder. When the Elder emailed me again, and again didn’t respond to me, I felt it was time to brush it off, and post it. If you are in a church and you do this to people – if this is church policy, to pray and not ACT to help those in need, then SHAME ON YOU! I’ve had more care and support from online ministers I’ve never met than from a church just three short miles from where I live. I am blessed that God has improved my situation and my health, because I have done everything I could to LISTEN to Him. However, a parishoner in need is a parishoner in need. So here’s what I wrote in full (and unexpurgated).

I’m going to have a little rant, do excuse me. This is what occured to me when I wondered at the complete lack of ANY pastoral care from my local church.

“I’m going to sit at home and pray for you. I have emailed you and asked you how you are, that’s enough isn’t it? I’m not going to do anything practical. I’m not going to do anything face to face or physical. I’m not going to even tell you that I am thinking of you – I’m not even going to reply to your reply to me. No, I’m going to apply the invisible sticking plaster of prayer. And I’m applying it to myself, because your pain, your illness, your need is just too f****** real for me, and I cannot bear the thought that I could, or might need to rock up and show myself as a fellow member of the body of Christ and DO SOMETHING for you. Something practical – that I might have to put out my hand, or put my hand in my pocket for you. You can’t pay your bills? I’ll PRAY FOR YOU.”

Now, I’m not saying that God doesn’t hear those prayers. I’m not saying that heaven and earth cannot be moved by prayer, because thankfully God has been working all this pain for my good, and things are better than they were, but you know God does expect us to DO something.

Let’s take a real-life example. If you’re on the way to the shops and you see a homeless person, do you walk past them and ignore them and think ‘I’ll pray for them.’ Or do you give them some change, and have a chat with them – find out their story? Do you stop on the way back from the shop with food for them (if you’re worried that money might be all spent on booze)?

If you would walk past and pray for that person then you are like the majority of the Body of Christ – applying invisible sticking plasters of prayer to those in need, in fact to your own discomfort when faced with their need. Because to communicate with a person in pain is just too, well, uncomfortable for you.

Let me rip that off you now *rips*


Good – now think about what you could practically do for the person in need who you know in your congregation, while you have the chance to reach them – before they leave, as I just have.

Churches have opportunities to reach those who are struggling, alone and vulnerable. If that person is strong enough they will hold on by their finger tips awaiting a little inclusion, a little support.

If that doesn’t come, they will leave.

I don’t think I need to express why – but I know many who are not Christians who know better how to care for those in need than those in the church do.


God Bless you


Ghoulish ‘ethicist’ wants euthanasia for coma patients, so that organs can be removed

Zoe Fritz.jpg
Zoe Fritz ‘ethicist’ and proponent of medical murder

Oh yes, she wants to push coma patients to the point where they can be declared dead and their organs removed  (vivisection). I quote: (source)

Hospital patients who are in a permanent coma should be given drugs to hasten their deaths so doctors can harvest their organs for transplants, a prominent hospital consultant said yesterday.

New laws should sweep aside the legal ban on euthanasia and allow the organs of those killed to be removed for transplant, Dr Zoe Fritz argued. […]

…Dr Fritz, a consultant physician at Cambridge University Hospitals, and a medical ethics academic at Warwick and Cambridge universities, said that where a patient is going to die ‘it could be in a patient’s best interests to actively end their life with a drug that would stop the heart both to minimise potential suffering and in order to be able to have vital organs donated.’

How, Dr Fritz, is it in the best interests of patients (in a coma, and therefore unable to CONSENT) to have any trace of hope removed that they might live, and oh by the way you’ll only die when we CUT OUT YOUR STILL BEATING HEART!?

Oh but it’s OK – she only wants to do this with patients who have expressed a previous desire to be an organ donor! From the same article I quote:

Dr Fritz said in her paper that instead of withdrawing nutrition and hydration, courts should be required to consider how a patient would have wished to die and their preferences on organ donation.

It added: ‘If the conclusion from this consideration – with appropriate safeguarding – is that they would wish their life to be actively ended facilitating the donation of their organs, then this should be respected.’

Well, phewee – I mean they’ve consented, right? No – consent requires INFORMED consent. No-one has ever given informed consent to be an organ donor.

Vital organs come from LIVING people, not dead bodies. What she is calling for is drugs to be used to cause a) brain death (a false definition of death), or b) cardiac death (another false definition of death, which can be declared in less than a minute in some US states). Then they intend to vivisect a LIVING human for their organs.

This is outrageous, and must never be allowed.

I commented, of course – let’s see if my comment gets published. This is what I said (while half asleep this morning!)


Please share this post far and wide!

God Bless you


So what antidepressant was Steven on when he decided to become a woman?

I’ve covered this before, here: Link and I quote from an article I link there:

“The very first case I had like this in the early 1990’s from Prozac was a married family physician who had this reaction of changes in sexual orientation. He wanted me shouting this warning from the tops of the Rocky Mountains!”

Antidepressants are linked to changes in sexual orientation. How many children and adults are on these drugs and don’t know that that is why they suddenly feel the urge to change gender? Well here we have Steven, who now wants to be called Pamela:

Picture credit: Daily Mail

This story is presented as a right-on tale of a plucky wife facing her husband’s gender change by taking him shopping for ladies clothes. I quote: (Link)

“A transgender father has described the emotional moment he received his wife and children’s blessings to transition into a woman.

Steven Saunders, 55, broke down when he confessed to his wife and ‘soulmate’ Josie that he could no longer fight his urge to wear woman’s clothes.

But instead of being taken aback, Josie responded with unwavering compassion – and took her 6ft1in partner clothes shopping to buy women’s outfits.”

Let me repeat from the previous piece I wrote that suicide rates amongst transgender people is 41%. Why is society encouraging this? Why is the media writing glowing little pieces like this about Dad’s transition to being a woman, and how the kids are OK with it?

Let’s not be naive here – the devil is very busy messing with us – on all levels, from gender bending chemicals in the water (and even till receipts: Link), to antidepressants which are linked to transgender feelings – we need to stop encouraging this like we’re in some brave new age of enlightenment. It is wrong, and it’s unnatural, and this poor man is making a very serious error. It’s not his fault, and he needs our prayers, as do his family, but let’s not pretend this is normal, or it may become so…

God Bless you


The 6% – Medical researcher says ‘let’s take organs from euthanasia patients while they’re still alive!’

This is the ULTIMATE SICKNESS – it comes from shifting sands morality – moral relativism, which with each generation leads to deeper and deeper levels of savagery. Well this is peak savagery. I quote (Link) [my emphasis added, and my comments in square brackets]

Doctors should have the right to take organs from patients who want to die so they can be used in transplant surgery, a prominent medical researcher has suggested.

Those who want to be killed should be sedated [N.B. NOT ANAESTHETISED] in hospital then allowed to die after the removal of their vital organs, according to the proposal published by a British-based medical ethics journal. [allowed to die AFTER their organs are removed? Removing their organs will kill them!]

Using organs for transplant surgery from patients who have been helped to die is allowed in Belgium and Holland, the European countries where euthanasia is legal.

But ‘dead donor’ rules mean there must be a gap between the death of the patient and the removal of organs, with the delay meaning their quality may decline. [Nonsense – all organ donors are only ‘tested’ to see if they fulfill faulty criteria – brain death or cardiac death, they are never dead until their organs are removed]

However an article in the Journal of Medical Ethics yesterday advocated ‘heart-beating organ donation euthanasia’. This would involve an operation in which organs would be taken from still-living patients who have given permission.

It would allow those who wish to die to donate their organs while improving the chances of successful transplants, the article said.

The proposal by Jan Bollen, a researcher in Holland, drew condemnation from opponents of euthanasia and assisted suicide in Britain, where assisted dying remains illegal following an overwhelming vote against by MPs last year.

I am speechless – if you have seen anything about euthanasia in Holland, you know this is now happening to perfectly physically healthy people who are depressed. They are not interested in helping people with these problems, and goodness they certainly won’t go near a church with their problems, they go to a doctor and end up being USED like this? This is SICK! I am glad to say that Fiona Bruce, a UK MP has spoken out against this, citing serious ethical concerns. You can read her comments in the article linked above.

This is appalling, but still they are testing the waters – giving you step by step pointers until the next generation wonder why we held off so long from this sickness.

Please pray for Jan Bollen – this is an individual who has no true moral compass, and only God can preserve his or her soul from eternal separation from God.

If you haven’t come across the 6% before, read these articles – this is psychopathy dressed up as pragmatism.

The six percent – psychopaths in our midst

The 6% – putting it into perspective

The 6% – Animal cruelty

If you haven’t read my previous articles about organ donation, click the links below

Organ donation scandal – the truth about organ donation – MUST READ MUST SHARE

Organ donation and the myth of ‘informed consent’

Talking to my dear friend about organ donation

UK Transplant surgeon suggests babies with defects could be born for their organs

God Bless you


My email to Bishop James Newcome, Bishop of Carlisle, and his reply

Now that I have received a response from Bishop James Newcome, Bishop of Carlisle, I think I ought to share what I wrote to him, as well as his reply. This was my email to him:

Dear Sir,

Further to this article and with great respect I must write to you with regard to your recent comments on organ donation.

Sadly the public are severely misinformed about organ donation, and I am including with this email some links for you to peruse. I believe once you read these, and pray about this you will see that this is NOT what God wants us to do with our bodies, and that we must resist organ donation as we resist abortion. Any surgical procedure which results in the death of the patient is not a Godly thing that He would approve of. It is indeed a sacrificial offering, but not one we should be encouraging anyone to agree to.

Quote from here:

“BRAIN DEATH”- The new “Pretend Death” is not True Death

Prior to 1968 a person was declared dead only after their breathing and heart stopped for a determinate period of time. The current terminology “Brain Death” was unheard of.

When surgeons realized they had the capability of taking organs from one seemingly “close to death” person and implanting them into another person to keep the recipient alive longer, a “Pandora’s Box” was opened.

In the beginning, through trial and error, they discovered it was not possible to perform this “miraculous” surgery with organs taken from someone truly dead–even if the donor was without circulation for merely a few minutes – because organ damage occurs within a very brief time after circulation stops.     

To justify their experimental procedures it was necessary for them to come up with a solution which is how the term “Brain Death” was contrived.  To verify the determination of “brain death” they developed more than 30 different sets of criteria to declare “brain death” (DBD) published from 1968–1978. Every new set was less strict than previous sets–now there are many more.  Dear reader, those criteria are flawed.

Recently we read and heard about the young man in Oklahoma declared “brain dead,” but his cousin, a nurse, recognized response during the 4 hours of preparation to take his organs.  The transplant was not done.  This young man is living proof that “brain death” is not true death.  If his organs had been taken, he would have been killed.

He even attested to being able to hear and understand what was taking place but was unable to speak in his own defense as a result of his brain injury.  Most frighteningly, he could not cry out “STOP!” when it came to the harvesting of his own organs.  IMPORTANT: This is not an isolated case

More recently, when there is a desire to get organs while the donor still has obvious brain activity, a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) is obtained to stop the life support. When the donor is pulseless for as short as 75 seconds (but the heart is still beating) the organs are taken – this is called Donation by Cardiac Death (DCD).  When a heart is taken for transplantation, after about 1 hour of operating, while the heart is beating and blood pressure and circulation are normal, the heart is stopped by the transplant surgeon. Then the surgeon lifts the heart from the donor’s chest.

Quote from here:

“An authoritative view is that “Science cannot address the problem of consciousness” – though some Nobel Laureates have tried. Unless and until that changes, there can be no question of considering a brain dead while blood continues to circulate through it. How long, after the truly final cessation of all such blood flow, one must wait before deciding that a brain is dead is the question which requires scientific investigation for the provision of a reliable answer. It is, of course, a complex question requiring the consideration of variables such as prior nutrition, temperature, etc. My personal clinical observations suggest that (at ordinary temperatures) that period is greatly in excess of the waiting times currently in use for ‘DCD’ organ procurement. [I once resuscitated a neurologist after some 40 minutes of cardiac arrest – during which there was some ham-fisted chest compression/ventilation – and he returned to active consultant practice].”

Quote from here:

“Tani begged doctors not to switch off her life support. A doctor, a social worker and a “patient advocate” rang him and again urged him to remove the ventilator and let her die. After two weeks Tani finally gave in to their demands but insisted that a breathing tube be inserted into Gloria’s mouth so that she could continue breathing on her own.

Just three days later, Gloria revived, awoke from her coma and was getting around Royal Darwin Hospital in a wheelchair. This was two months after doctors declared her dead. A doctor admitted that his prognosis was “wrong”. He reports that she is alert, mobile and on her way to recovery (May 2011).

Life Site News reports that an increasing number of experts have begun calling into question the “brain death” criteria for determining death. They argue that “brain death” is an arbitrary set of criteria developed largely to ensure the usability of organs harvested from such patients, as well as to decrease the medical costs involved in keeping “brain dead” patients alive on life support.”

And from my own blog:

“It says ‘I want to help others to live after my death.’ What it doesn’t say is that you will be kept alive until your organs have been removed, even though you will be given no anaesthetic, and they may say you are ‘brain-dead’ but that definition has only been in existence since organ donation first became feasible.”

There is an excellent video at the end of that post which you may find extremely helpful.

I hope you will prayerfully consider what I have sent you, and that you will share your comments with me when you have read and watched the information provided. I believe I am one of very few who are trying to reach out with this important message, in order to prevent suffering and ultimately the deaths of those who cannot defend themselves. It is they who the church should be protecting.

God Bless you

Lis xxxxxxx

Today I received this response from Bishop Newcome:

Dear Ms xxxxxxx

Thank you for your e-mail and attachments about organ donation which I have read carefully.  I have to say that I (and  all the doctors I know) remain satisfied with ‘brain death’ as an adequate definition of being dead.  However, I am most grateful to you for your very proper concern, and for taking the trouble to write as you did.  Incidentally, my further thoughts on this are contained in a little book (published recently) called ‘At the End of the Day’.

With best wishes


James Newcome

Bishop of Carlisle

I’m sad to say that I cannot see how this man is a man of God when the thought of someone being alive while their organs are removed does not move him to reverse his position. I publish his response because he is a public figure and prominent in the church in endorsing this stance. Christians rely on their leaders, and it is up to those of us who know to hold them to account for their huamn failings.

Doctors may well be satisfied with the current definition of brain death, but many anaesthetists are not – they are aware something is wrong, and I will continue to work to spread the message that organ donation does NOT happen after death.

I have sent the following brief response:

Dear Bishop,

Thank you for your reply – I would urge you to continue to seek God on this issue. God does not want us used as spare parts, and He certainly does not want us to be lied to to achieve it. Those on the organ donor register have NOT given informed consent to have their vital organs removed while still alive.

That is both a LEGAL crime, surely, and certainly a moral one.

Kind regards


Please take a moment to pray for Bishop James Newcome – and ask God to reveal His truth to him.

God Bless you