The Manchester bombing – an assault on freedom

I opened Twitter this morning to see a tweet from the Russian Embassy, giving an emergency number out, with the hashtag #Manchester. It didn’t sink in straight away. Another tweet was talking about the UK’s reaction to Manchester. Oh no. Another attack?

Sadly, yes. This time, apart from the deeply occult “22 deaths on the 22nd May” I cannot see anything so far in the images I’ve seen which suggests this was faked in any way. Perhaps this time it was real terror, perhaps it was a set up. Either way, it suits evil Theresa May and her nightmarish vision of ‘security’.

You see, the media claim that four hours prior to the bomb blast, there were posts on Twitter by Isis connected accounts, which mentioned both terror and Manchester Arena.

manchester 1.png

Further down the page:

manchester 2

And the Daily Mail’s comments:

manchester 3

Be aware here – note the use of language. First of all they could tweet out about an up-coming terror attack, apparently. Then, although Twitter suspended many accounts, they state that “other euphoric supporters posted messages across Telegram and other secured messaging systems”. In other words – encryption is bad. Only bad people want to use secured messaging. Nothing about stopping bad people from coming to our country, no, and as I’ve written before, it is the perfect way to shut down an open society. People are clamouring for more security in the wake of this!

manchester 5.jpg

More security necessary? Why not have a full TSA style pat-down? Or real-time phone tapping? The problem here is Islam, but at this rate we will have to have that TSA style pat-down to go into a shopping centre. Is that what we want? NO! We want fewer terrorists (real or FAKE). More security doesn’t solve this problem.

But the narrative continues at the Daily Mail:

manchester 4

Yes, Theresa May’s plan for a new, regulated, internet – well, it’s clearly necessary, isn’t it? I mean – freedom? What do you want that for – freedom allows dangerous people to hurt your feelings, or worse, blow you up! Freedom is dangerous in the wrong hands. Apparently.ย  I quote from the above linked article (censored, ironically, for profanity ๐Ÿ˜‰ ):

 

“We will put a responsibility on industry not to direct users โ€“ even unintentionally โ€“ to hate speech, pornography, or other sources of harm. We will make clear the responsibility of platforms to enable the reporting of inappropriate, bullying, harmful or illegal content, with take-down on a comply-or-explain basis.

Basically: we will make private internet companies our internet censorship police, or we’ll fine them millions of dollars. This will create all sorts of unnecessary problems. First, to avoid liability, companies will massively over-censor. We see this happen all the time. All sorts of perfectly fine and legitimate content will be censored just to avoid the potential liability. Second, this will be massively expensive. Sure, Facebook and Google can probably handle the expense, but no one else will be able to. If you’re trying to start the next Facebook or Google in the UK, you’re f****d. You can’t afford to police all the content on your platform, nor can you afford the potential liability. Probably best to just move somewhere else. Third, does the UK government really want private platforms like Google and Facebook making these determinations? Why is it handing off the responsibility of what kind of speech is “illegal” to private, for-profit companies (foreign companies, at that)?”

So, whilst I have immense sympathy for anyone caught up in the Manchester bombing, and feel that, of course, something needs to be done, I have no confidence in our government to not simply use this incident to further it’s own policy agenda. It’s convenient, in that it will allow the narrative of ‘more security’ to trump the calls for fewer migrants!

Another quote from the same article:

“In addition, we do not believe that there should be a safe space for terrorists to be able to communicate online and will work to prevent them from having this capability.

And this may be the most terrifying line of all here. That’s the dog whistle for “we’ll outlaw encryption” because encryption — in the minds of foolish, scaredy-cat politicians — creates “safe spaces” for terrorists. Nevermind that the same encryption creates “safe” spaces for every other person and that undermining that makes absolutely everyone less safe. This is a dangerous plan that seems to echo the words of the UK’s Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, from a few months ago, where she wanted to find people who knew the necessary hashtags to silence terrorists online. This isn’t policy making. This is nonsense.”

 

I think this makes that point rather well. We all remember the famous quote:

franklin

I couldn’t have put it better.

Satan’s plan is coming to fruition. Satan’s plan to destroy the people of God (who were once of God, and who now walk contrary to God, whom He divorced for adultery) is going rather too well. The elites, who willingly bowed down to worship satan in return for power and wealth, are all slowly orchestrating satan’s plan. They may think it’s their plan. They may believe this is what they want. But satan is doing just as God allows, and has free rein, up to a point, to bring us to our knees.

And on our knees is where we need to be.

God’s judgement is here. Do you know Christ? Are you saved? Have you repented of your sins? If not, now is the time to get right with God.

God Bless you

Lis

Advertisements

The Daily Mail censors South Africa comments AGAIN!

I have to keep posting these – there has to be a record somewhere of what is being censored in the MSM – how important to keep showing that, try as we might to raise this issue, we have not been ALLOWED to tell the truth about South Africa.

The other day there was anย  an article about a woman who had posted this image on her Twitter to a storm of condemnation:

muslim majority.jpg

When whites are a minority, we know what it’ll be like: South Africa, so I commented:

comments they won't allow sa crop.jpg

Needless to say this was too close to the truth for the Daily Mail to allow out there, and the comment did not appear.

Then yesterday they had an article about South Africa – someone had been out to SA taking drone photographs of the disparity of the dwellings of the rich and the poor. I commented as a reply to another commenter (click for bigger)

sa comment crop.jpg

I also commented: (again click for bigger)sa comment 2 crop.jpg

Neither appeared. Interestingly the comments on that article were moderated – why would you need to moderate comments on an article about aerial photographs of SA? Take a look at what was allowed:

moderated comments on an article about SA crop.jpg

Just vague comments and questions – nothing of any substance. I am disgusted with the DM for this. If you want to see the article you can find it here: Link – and also note that the article appears in the TRAVEL section of the paper?! Wow – not even worth the political attention of readers. Disgraceful. I’ll share couple of troubling things now, both thanks to stopwhitegenocideinsareports.blogspot.co.uk

sa farmers

stop white genocide

We MUST act to support South African whites NOW! Can you act as a sponsor for someone seeking to leave SA? Look into your immigration laws – if you are wealthy or have work, can you sponsor a white South Africa worker and their family to come to your country? If you can, then please consider this – get in touch with me via the About Lis page. I have contacts who would love to hear from you, I’m sure. We have to do everything we can both for those leaving, and for those staying – first and foremost – PRAY for South Africa, please!

Also please consider a donation to Karin Smith – she needs a secod surgery and she’s not over her first yet. The wonderful folks at SAFRPSA.org (South Africa Faily Relief Project) made this wonderful little video as a tribute to Karin’s hard work and dedication. Keep them and her in your prayers please. This fight is for the life of our race – if they can get away with this in SA they can get away with it here (and they plan to).

Please share the video far and wide – it’s good for both Karin and for the whole movement in general.

God Bless you

Lis

An Update on Karin Smith – a vocal and vital campaigner for South African whites

Karin was one of the first people I ever heard speak about the horrors of South Africa’s white genocide. She spoke bravely about the, frankly, unspeakable – even though it upsets her to talk about the tortures and murders which take place daily there.

Karin moved to the US with her American husband, but a while ago was hit while in her car, side on, by an illegal, and she was injured badly. She has now begun surgery to fix the damage. She is convalescing right now from the first round of surgery, but has more to go, and needs some financial support and, of course, prayers!

I pray that God will keep her strong, heal her quickly, and enable her to continue her vital work – we require people like Karin, for the news to get out, and for us to remain well informed on things happening in South Africa which the mainstream news will not talk about (or allow the public to mention).

Please go to radiofreesouthafrica.com to make a donation, or you can donate direct to her through her paypal email address which is Cooks595@yahoo.com – her show will also go off the air soon without support, so please find it in your heart (and wallet!) to assist in keeping this most vital message going. Until we all know the truth of what is happening in South Africa, and are moved to do something about it, the job is not done.

Karin’s personal update can be found here:

Please share this post and all the posts at the following link with all your friends:

https://selahministriesblog.wordpress.com/tag/south-africa/

God Bless you

Lis

Curiouser and curiouser…

The Daily Mail has been lambasted here on this blog for censoring comments related to South Africa and the white genocide taking place there. I’ve written about it on numerous occasions. You see previous posts here: https://selahministriesblog.wordpress.com/tag/censorship/

So today I logged in and found that one of those comments from yesterday had emerged, sometime much later in the day yesterday! One of them got through!

comment appeared.jpg

Now why it didn’t show up when posted, yet my later one showed up immediately on the same article, I can’t say. I just think it’s curiouser and curiouser…

Still they will not mention the genocide, and as I shared earlier, Malema of the EFF says they are ‘at war with whites’ – now you watch what happens.

Please pray for South Africa.

God Bless you

Lis

Daily Mail censorship – even in unmoderated comments

Oh yeah, banging this drum again – it has to be done, because the more pieces there are out there DOCUMENTING this censorship, the more likely they are to think twice about continuing to do it.

Here goes…

An article regarding a brave South African-born (white) soldier who lost both legs below the knee fighting on the side of Britain in Afghanistan – well, hey, let’s just reject HIM for British citizenship! Why not – I mean both his parents are here in the UK, let’s just send a guy who has prosthetic limbs and only one fully functional hand to live in a place that’s not safe for whites. Makes sense (to the twisted minds of the UK government). So I commented on this article, and comments were not being moderated yet this comment:

DM comment genocide

Did not appear. So I thought, it’s the ‘g’ word, genocide. So I’ll try again:

dm comments 2

Nope siree Bob – no, I must have mentioned South Africa – odd that this would be picked up by any logarithm seeing as the article is about a South African person? How odd.

So someone else made a comment which I could reply to without mentioning white genocide:

dm comments 3

That one got through. So we can mention the mechanism for genocide (Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 if you are European/American), but not the genocide taking place right now in SA. *fumes*

I also noticed, on another article, an interesting anomaly, which leads me to suspect that they are playing about with the arrow counts on various comments. I had down-arrowed this comment (which causes the arrow block to highlight red), and then when I clicked through to the ‘best rated’ comments, it was there, showing still the highlight from where I clicked it, but not the score from me clicking it…

dm false voting

Hmmm.

I have to assume that the fuming and spouting I see (much of which I can safely say I agree with) on DM comments, is what the NWO will ALLOW you to fume and spout about. UN Agenda 21/2030 is public – the South African white genocide is hidden.

So each time I get censored I will write about it here, because these are the things they DON’T want you to know or hear about, and that leads to some interesting speculation as to WHY!

God Bless you

Lis

South Africa mention gets censored again by the Daily Mail

*sigh*

I keep trying, but it’s like this:

don't mention the war
Don’t mention the war!

Yes, we must not mention it, reasons the UK media, but why?

Why can South Africa not be mentioned. I wrote this comment on an article about the Swedish report which blamed Swedish culture for the rape attacks and violence against whites from the migrants they have let in. (Yes, they really are blaming the victims).

censorship2.jpg

But no, this comment has not appeared, even though I left out the word ‘genocide’ this time.

No, South Africa is the test bed, and the f*cking press know it (excuse me swearing but I am so angry about this!). The press are complicit in genocide of the white race, and are hiding the first of the victims so that we cannot know, and cannot prepare ourselves accordingly.

I am glad you found this blog today, if you are new here. Get ready, because a global communist take-over requires the deaths of Christians and whites. Without that there will be resistance. We must resist NOW, and SPEAK UP!

Please share this post, and all my posts on South Africa with any white friends you know who haven’t woken up yet – this bee in my bonnet is not going away, and I suspect it won’t for a long, long time to come.

Ugh!

God Bless you

Lis

Daily Mail comment censorship – update

I wrote previously that I had written to the Daily Mail regarding censorship of comments regarding the genocide of whites in South Africa:

I wrote previously that all my attempts at highlighting the very real threat of genocide of the white minority population in South Africa had been censored by the Daily Mail. Indeed the post I made this morning has also not appeared – I posted the comment when there were just 13 comments on the article, and now there are 464, and you guessed it, mine is not among them!

So I have written to the Daily Mail to ask them why this is! Here is my email:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Three times now I have tried to highlight in the comments section of various of your articles related to South Africa that the country is heading towards a genocide of the minority white population. Each time my comment has been censored. Would you please explain why this is?

This important issue should be front page news reporting, yet your paper seems happy to leave the public in the dark about what is happneing there! I would have thought that allowing comments that highlight this issue, which is a known an accepted fact, as stated by Genocidewatch.net, would be in the public interest.

I await your response with interest.

Yours sincerely

Mrs L Goodwin

I will be sure to let you know what response, if any, I receive!

God Bless you

Lis

Well I will now share the response I got:

DM response

I wrote back and asked:

Dear Kate,

I do not see how highlighting the growing genocide in South Africa could be construed as offensive to anyone – perhaps you would explain that to me? My comments were in no way inflammatory or offensive, they were merely to highlight this phenomenon which seems to get no coverage in the news here in the UK.

Perhaps you could amend your comment logarithms to allow such important messages to be published?

Kind regards

Mrs L Goodwin

That was on the 19th – to date I have had no further response. I’m guessing the Daily Mail is content to censor this issue for reasons which I suspect but cannot prove.

God Bless you

Lis