Rape is sex without consent.

I knew this day would come. I kept my mouth shut hoping that it would not. Hoping that if I didn’t say anything, it would just not come to be, but I watched, and I knew that this was likely.

Then I saw this headline today, and I knew that day had come. In fact it had come last year when the article was first published. Damnit!

trans 1.jpg

And of course you all know where this leads. Firstly this is homosexual rape – no one has the right to have sex with you under a fake identity (and especially when that fake identity would cause you to commit a mortal sin in the eyes of God). This is non consensual sex – this is rape. Tragically this also leads to this:

vile sin.jpg

This trans person, who clearly expects all the tolerance and understanding in the world, cannot see how someone might feel raped if they had unwittingly had homosexual sex???? It’s rape, plain and simple – it’s a total misrepresentation of who a person is.

If you don’t know what “cis” gendered is, by the way, it means natural (as God intended). Yes, they’re even trying to label and marginalise us now!

So whilst I do not condone violence in any shape or form, I do believe that this is a vile sin against a person and rape indeed if the gender has been changed (because your birth sex and chromosomes can NEVER be changed!).

The writer goes on:

“Thus, not being attracted to trans people is deeply transphobic. The entire notion that someone isn’t attracted to a group of very physically diverse group of people because they are trans is built on fear and disgust of trans people. None of this means it is transphobic to not be attracted to individual trans people. Nor is it transphobic to not be attracted to specific genitals. But it is transphobic to claim to not be attracted to all trans, people. For example, there is a difference between saying you won’t go out with someone for having a penis and saying you won’t go out with someone because they’re trans.

So when a cis person argues that a trans person has an obligation to come out to someone before dating them, they are saying trans people have an obligation to accommodate their transphobia. Plus, claiming that trans people are obligated to come out reinforces the idea that not being attracted to trans people is reasonable. But as I’ve pointed out, not being attracted to trans people supports the idea that transness is disgusting which is the basis for transphobic oppression.”

[…] The one scenario in which I would say a trans person should disclose their trans status is if they are going to have sex with someone and are unsure if their partner is attracted to whatever genitals they may have. In that case, I think it’s courteous for a trans person to come out to avoid any awkwardness during sex. But even then, a trans person isn’t “lying” if they don’t come out and their partner is certainly not being “raped.” [Really?!]

It is easy to look at the story of Jennifer Laude and claim that her death was due to the actions of one bigot. But it’s more complicated than that. Pemberton was the product of a society that told him that disgust towards trans people was reasonable and natural. So when he found out that he accidentally slept with a trans woman, he killed her. (Link)

First of all the writer makes the mistake of thinking that attraction is the basis for a sexual relationship. Attraction is one basis, but the primary basis is CONSENT! You do not have that persons consent to have homosexual sex with them! Tell me how would a lesbian feel if they found out they’s just had sex with a trans woman? Might they say this was wrong and they didn’t consent to have sex with someone who is genetically MALE!?

The rights of the trans person to privacy DO NOT and can NEVER trump the rights of their partner to CONSENT to a homosexual act – which is what this is (or a heterosexual encounter, as described above).

I warn you now that the day will come when Trans people will demand this right mooted in the article – they will demand the right to not reveal who they are. And sadly this will lead to more terrible crimes of violence, and worse – people will be condemned by God for the sin of homosexuality which is a sin unto death.

Maranatha!

God Bless you

Lis

Historic England now ‘queering’ history

*sigh*

Historic England.jpg

This beautiful building, which has featured in the TV drama ‘Poirot’ has a secret homosexual history (which we must now have forced down our throats). I quote:

A unique and sprawling mansion built ‘in response to homophobia’ has been awarded Grade-II listed status as part of a project recognising Britain’s ‘queer history’.

St Ann’s Court in Surrey was once home to the stockbroker Gerald Schlesinger and celebrated landscape architect Christopher Tunnard.

The property was masterfully designed so that the couple’s bedroom could be split into two separate rooms – enabling them to keep their relationship a secret at a time when homosexuality was a criminal offence. […]

Historic England has listed, upgraded or updated listings for six locations across England which are of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) value.

Other locations include the grave of writer, musician and Egyptologist Amelia Edwards, the London home of Oscar Wilde and the house where Benjamin Britten lived with his partner, the tenor Peter Pears. 

Historic England said this was part of a major initiative ‘to improve understanding and recognition of England’s diverse heritage, tackling under-recognition of the major influences and contributions of communities including LGBTQ, Black and Minority Ethnic Groups, disabled people and women in building the nation we live in.’ (source)

No, it’s called ramming it down our throats that even the history we cherished as ‘normal’ was in fact infested with homosexuals, thus justifying the dominance of their agenda today. Notable by their absence in the last sentence there were straight white men….

*sigh*

God Bless you

Lis

The Daily Mail is now a sewer like Buzzfeed!

homosexual abomination.jpg

This is total reprobate filth. I have absolutely no further comment to make.

See also: A glimpse into the sewer, and a tribute to Mary Whitehouse

God Bless you

Lis

Presented WITH comment

bikes.jpg

Two pictures of bikes*, one on the left, one on the right.

*Bike is English idiom for a woman who has been ‘well ridden’, just in case that missed you!

You can read the whole sordid story here: Visitors to Burning Man’s ‘Orgy Dome’ share what it’s REALLY like inside the tent

God Bless you

Lis

Joel Osteen is NOT a hypocrite!

Nope, sireee Bob – he is, in my view, a more honest ‘Christian’ than many who purport to preach from our pulpits.

You see Joel has abandoned the law so completely that his error is OBVIOUS to us all. I quote:

When asked directly if people whom are openly practicing homosexuals are accepted into the Kingdom, Joel Osteen responded with “Absolutely, anybody is.” […]

Joel does acknowledge that some things are “sin” but says, “I don’t address these things from the pulpit. They only come up in interviews.” When asked if openly practicing gay/homosexual people will be accepted into heaven, Joel Osteen responded, “I believe they will.”

He makes no mention of the need for repentance. (source)

So unlike the churches who teach that homosexuality is sin, while handing round the ham sandwiches on SUNDAY, yep, Joel is NOT a hypocrite.

He is so obviously in error that perhaps it’s time for those churches which have partially abandoned the Law of Moses to reconsider that – specifically in light of 1 John 3:4

transgression

I love God and I love the law – it’s what helps me to walk in righteousness. I don’t do it well, but I try. Because I love God, and I want to walk in Yeshua’s footsteps and do what He did. I believe He shows us how to apply the law – with mercy.

Joel Osteen, I pray, is making some pastors reconsider their stance on the Law today.

God Bless you

Lis

Symbolism is not coincidence – the “Gender Unicorn”

Oh my. It can be easy to let folks off the hook when symbolism appears ‘misused’, yet I believe that where we notice symbolism it is indeed a sign! God wants us to be aware of the agenda. And believe me there’s an agenda…

The latest foray into destructive Cultural Marxist social engineering for children is the ‘Gender Unicorn’:

genderunicorn.jpg

Now, just ignore the rest of the form here – just notice the Unicorn. The Unicorn is thinking a ‘rainbow’ – first of all the rainbow (God’s symbol perverted for modern consumption) is a symbol NOT of all sexualities, but ONLY of perverted sexualitites. It is symbolic of the LGBTQ etc. crowd. So you’re starting off on something which is deliberately designed to queer students thoughts about themselves.

But the most prominent fact about the Unicorn is the occult significance of using that beast. I’ve mentioned the Unicorn in previous posts – particularly one about Illuminati clothing. I quote from there:

I start with their ‘Unicorn offering’ – there were so many more than these, and the Unicorn, according to Constance Cumbey, is significant to the New Age Movement (I quote from her book A Planned Deception)

a planned deception snippet

So beware, this isn’t just make believe for kids, this is a powerful force spiritually being invoked for evil purposes.

So here we have that symbolism turning up on clothing the unsuspecting public wears, signalling their willingness, in absence of knowing what they are ‘consenting’ to!

So now the agenda becomes more open and more obvious.This agenda is the DESTRUCTION of gender norms – in fact to turn every child into a confused, off balance, disconcerted little snowflake/Narcissist in order to destroy western civilisation. Let me be clear – white western civilisation.

unicorn gender

Because this isn’t going to be tried on African nations, nor in China, for example. It’s also not going to work on immigrants coming to Europe. Oh no. African and/or Muslim migrants aren’t going to bow to this insanity. Did you know in South Africa, lesbians are raped – gang raped – to “straighten them out”? Can you imagine what these bastards will do to your confused and vulnerable children when they become the majority in the once-great-now-introspective-snowflake-land of Europe? I hate to think.

So, what to do?

In another previous article, I wrote:

We must speak while we can – because the gag is coming soon – we will be silenced on this as we have been on homosexuality. We will be stopped from speaking the truth because they don’t want to hear it.

These are the times we must remember that Christianity is repellent to those who have strongholds of evil. We can, however, pray for them.

All this has come to pass so fast – this slide into filth and evil. What will we, who are holding onto the truth, do when we are faced with a generation of vulnerable, messed up children, many damaged beyond repair. I’m afraid we will be at the mercy of the elites, and these, their pawns.

So please avoid symbols and images in your own home. Don’t allow that evil Unicorn into your child’s pencil case, or onto your child’s favourite stationery or clothing – keep these symbols and their occult, demonic strongholds, out of your homes and lives. And pray.

God Bless you

Lis

LGBT Kiss-in held in Sainsbury’s

Whoop, whoop, sound the alarm!

CONTROVERSY

Because I am going to ask a simple question. Isn’t shoving a disliked behaviour in the face of those who dislike it, bullying?

I mean if you were asexual (meaning you did not enjoy sex or have a sex drive) you might feel uncomfortable witnessing any PDAs. You might cringe at the sight of any couple kissing. No-one would force you to witness this – no-one would turn up in your house or office and demand you look at the behviour. Unless they were gay. In fact the security guard who apparently threw a gay couple out of Sainsbury’s for holding hands did so because someone complained. The complainer is probably in the minority. They’re probably not asexual, but they’re someone who finds gay men holding hands offensive. Just like I would prefer not to see cats screwing, he might prefer to not see gay men holding hands. He’s a minority. LGBT folks are bullying a fellow minority in a VERY public way.

I don’t hate gay people – I’ve had so many gay friends over the years. They were absolutely lovely and great fun. This isn’t about who you are as people. This is about using your ‘right’ to behave as you please as a battering ram to silence those who don’t like it. It’s actually diabolically insensitive. I quote from the article:

“The more we [LGBT people] hold hands, kiss, and show affection in public the more healthy we will be as a society,” he said. “People are only shocked because they have never seen two men together before. That’s how shock happens, it comes from fear.” (source)

Fear? I don’t think people are afraid of gay people.

However, I think a lot of people who don’t like to see sluts in their PJs in the local supermaket would be equally horrified to see a man in suspenders gyrating in a FOOD store!

Kiss in.jpg

This form of activism is a deeply offensive and bullying method of getting your own way. In fact the rule here seems to be that you’ll keep shoving it in our faces until we either like it, or shut up – what about that is not bullying? I’m sorry but it is.

God Bless you

Lis

Read also: Homosexuality – tolerance leads to suffering