The 5G Dragnet – the end of privacy?

This is a must watch video – if you aren’t aware of 5G, or don’t know the thinking behind it, this video pretty much encapsulates all the issues which this new technology creates.

For more on the “Smart” agenda, read this previous post: https://selahministriesblog.wordpress.com/2015/05/26/smart-agenda-relies-on-our-ignorance-of-it/

If you value freedom of thought, you will resist 5G. It’s not about freedom of speech anymore. This recent article shows why (Link) in which is the following exchange between a pupil and a teacher in the UK. I quote [emphasis added]:

The three-minute video shows the teacher explaining to the child why he was asked to leave the class at an Aberdeen-shire secondary school, after the teenager had claimed there were only two genders.

The teacher tells the pupil: ‘You’re entitled to your opinion’, to which the teenager responds: ‘If I am, then why did you kick me out of class? It’s not very inclusive.’

Then the teacher replies: ‘No, I’m sorry, what you were saying is not very inclusive. This is an inclusive school.’

The teacher then says there is more than one gender ‘by law’, and that by claiming there are only two genders, the pupil had not been ‘inclusive’.

The member of staff continues: ‘You were clearly given an opportunity not to pursue it. You chose to do so.’

At this point, the pupil tells him: ‘I think it’s silly to have anything other than two genders, sir.’

The teacher then urges him: ‘Could you please keep that opinion to your own house? Not in this school.’

Once you have a smart speaker in your home, a 5G enabled fridge, a smart home which can be hacked into by criminals etc. will you be allowed to keep that opinion even at home? No, of course not. Pre-crime – they’ll be out to get you before you spout any more hate. Like reading the bible aloud…

Yeshua is coming soon. The great and terrible day of the LORD.

Lis

Advertisements

The UK’s political situation is worthy of comment

Ugh.

Seems like a fair point, doesn’t it?

And do you know I won’t be voting? Oh no, and I’m going to tell you why.

First of all, let’s just note that Nigel Farage’s “Brexit Party” is about to wipe the floor with both the main parties in next week’s European Elections – elections, I might add, which shouldn’t be happening, because we should have left the EU on the 29th March. According to a legal challenge which the media is down-playing, we might already have left the EU on that date, but that is an aside, because that has yet to be heard in a court of law.

So next week the Brexit Party will achieve a landslide, and Theresa May’s hold on both the leadership of the Tory Party and on the country is going to be lost – and I suspect that a general election will be triggered, leaving us with a Corbyn government by default (if you divide the grass-root conservative vote like this, Corbyn will benefit).

And Brexit will be kicked ever further into the long grass.

So that is where we seem to be, if anything I read can be believed, and now for why I won’t be voting.

Normally I would do so, and certainly did in the referendum which brought us all such hope. But something has changed since then – I have been studying the scriptures more, and I recognise this system is not God’s way of doing things. God wanted to rule us Himself. But we rejected Him and asked for a King, and then years down the line we got rid of that too, and installed ourselves as the leaders of our own nations. We vote, and if 51% of those who vote (which might only be 50% of the population) say we should go one way, that will be the way the whole country must go.

And it’s the wrong way.

God said to the children of Israel that they were going to be given the land of Canaan, and that they were NOT to obey the statutes of that land – let’s read it from scripture: [emphasis added]

22 ‘You shall therefore keep all My statutes and all My judgments, and perform them, that the land where I am bringing you to dwell may not vomit you out. 23 And you shall not walk in the statutes of the nation which I am casting out before you; for they commit all these things, and therefore I abhor them. 24 But I have said to you, “You shall inherit their land, and I will give it to you to possess, a land flowing with milk and honey.” I am the Lord your God, who has separated you from the peoples. Leviticus 20:22-24 NKJV

The land vomited the people out because it was defiled: [emphasis added]

24 ‘Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for by all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you. 25 For the land is defiled; therefore I visit the punishment of its iniquity upon it, and the land vomits out its inhabitants. 26 You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations, either any of your own nation or any stranger who dwells among you 27 (for all these abominations the men of the land have done, who were before you, and thus the land is defiled), 28 lest the land vomit you out also when you defile it, as it vomited out the nations that were before you. 29 For whoever commits any of these abominations, the persons who commit them shall be cut off from among their people.

30 ‘Therefore you shall keep My ordinance, so that you do not commit any of these abominable customs which were committed before you, and that you do not defile yourselves by them: I am the Lord your God.’ ” Leviticus 18:24-30 NKJV

So the sin (transgression of the law – 1 John 3:4) caused the land to be defiled, and so the land vomited out it’s inhabitants, and God said to live by His law so that it wouldn’t happen to them – that’s us!

So what have we done? We have replaced His precious law – Lev 18:5 “You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, which if a man does, he shall live by them: I am the Lord.” – and we have made legal the things He hates. Get ready to be vomited out! Get ready for the judgement!

And so voting – giving credence to a system which can never get us back to where we were meant to be – is not only a waste of time and effort, but another way of remaining tied to the ways of this world, and not God’s ways.

There are some things in the Law of Moses which I cannot do, and some which don’t apply to me, but I can acknowledge the whole law as righteous, and the whole law as the only method to know right from wrong.

I will not give my vote to anyone, because to do so is to say that it’s acceptable for them to make new laws – laws which every day encroach more fully on my freedom to speak the truth of the Word of God. God said:

Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you. Deuteronomy 4:2 KJV

Well, we have made ourselves abominable as a nation before God, and we revel in that more every year. No longer will I add my vote to that.

God Bless you

Lis

Selling incompetence, Part II

I’ve written before about the method being used to draw us into a one-world-government by having our own governments be so “incompetent” that we cry out for better leadership, well, here is the new leader for the New Age… AI. And people actually want this. The insanity of it!

I quote: (Link)

“Fully one in four Europeans said they were “somewhat or totally in favor of letting an artificial intelligence make important decisions about the running of their country,” a number that climbed to one in three for the Netherlands, UK, and Germany, according to a survey by the Center for the Governance of Change, a tech-focused research group from IE University in Spain. The figures remained constant across education levels, gender, and political affiliation, indicating either Europeans are abnormally welcoming of their new robot overlords – or they’re sick of their human ones.

Spoiler alert: it’s likely the latter. While the survey uncovered high levels of technological anxiety across all demographics, even the fear of having one’s job stolen by robots doesn’t hold a candle to Europeans’ antipathy for their political masters…”

Perfect – what could be better than to have our societies run by a “higher power” – AI being superior to any human mind? Oh, we could have had our societies run by the Most High God – YHWH!

But we rejected Him, we wanted a King, and so He gave us a King, and even that wasn’t enough for us, so we created democracy – thinking we could do better running the place on a 51% – 49% mob rule.

That system has led to the creation of the media specifically to manipulate our actions and our votes. Now the idea is to move us towards a one-world man-made “utopia” (which will be communist, naturally) where we will be killed in droves.

It is interesting to see how a society, so in love with itself, the people so narcissistic, could consider giving all their power away to a computer. But God? Perhaps they won’t face the truth of His existence until the day of judgement – so keen are they on getting the perfect selfie for Instagram.

May the fear of the LORD bring you into all wisdom.

Lis

From 2020, you’re just spare parts under May’s murderous regime

When we think of evil, we recall the pictures of the holocaust, or images of the killing fields. We might think of those awful pictures of a man with a gun to his head, waiting to be shot, his body swiftly thrown into a ready-dug trench. Perhaps we recall earlier histories of barbarity, including the Spanish inquisition, and the human sacrifice of the savage and ignorant Aztecs.

We wouldn’t think of our own time, we wouldn’t think of our current government, because we wouldn’t – couldn’t – surely believe that our leaders were involved in hoodwinking the British public to be vivisected (dissected alive) for their organs. But that is indeed exactly what they have done since the organ “donor” register was created. Now, the government has passed a law which sets the default to “donor” for all people. Most won’t make a fuss, or opt out, because they don’t know the truth. Read more: Link

The lies about organ donation are required. Just as a mother who wants to believe, as she aborts her child in a state-sanctioned sacrifice (a sacrifice to her own life, her wants and her plans) that the child inside her is just a “blob of cells”, some “matter” to be removed, and that it (not he or she) feels no pain, the lies of organ donation are vital for the process to be continued.

If you knew that organs came from living people, not dead bodies, you’d be horrified. But the government lies to you, just as the abortionist comforts with lies a mother who doesn’t want the responsibility of her child. The family of the person who is deemed “brain dead” don’t know that that person is alive (and that life support does not keep the heart beating). If they knew that the organs would be removed without anaesthetic, and that their loved one was not dead in any way that they, or you, or I, understand, they would say NO!

But the necessary lies are there – the lie that the NHS will test you to make sure you’re dead. The lie that the organs are taken “after death” without explaining that the criteria for “death” aren’t death at all – the necessary lies for the most heinous and evil acts of murder, by a murderous regime – a regime who would sacrifice you in an instant.

Life is precious, and sacred. Death is the enemy. From next year you will have to OPT out of being vivisected – murdered – for your precious organs. Make sure you do.

For more (horrifying) facts, visit organfacts.net

Lis

Reader’s Digest

It’s been all quiet on the blog for a while – I’ve had more immediate and important things to contend with than words on a page. That, by the way, is a good thing.

But almost every day I contemplate writing a short piece about something, and then I don’t. Nothing is quite worth the time, when, well, haven’t I already said it? Haven’t I already shared a rant way back about these very subjects? They are only coming thicker and faster than ever now. I sometimes think I’ve run out of things to say when faced with the awfulness of our countries, and the way they are run.

So this post will be a reader’s digest (and viewer’s digest) of the last little while as a way of catching up with things with a little bit of comment throw in for good measure. Some of these stories I will share only though memes, and hopefully that will help it flow a little better.

We begin with Gillette. Disrespecting men (specifically white men) is coming more and more out in the open. When a brand used almost completely by men, disses men – the backlash is only to be expected.

gillette.PNG

 

Gillette spends their hard-earned profits killing babies:

abortion p g

And now, in New York, the leaders not only passed a bill allowing abortion up to the moment of birth, but gave its passing a standing ovation. Not content with that salute to Moloch, they then lit up the World Trade Centre in pink as a celebration of this momentous act of “reproductive justice” – their words.

meme

There have been calls for Governor Cuomo, a catholic, to be ex-communicated.

Moving on…

While we know the horrors going on in South Africa all too well, and the international silence about the genocide happening there, we see this top headline in the Daily Mail:

genocide.jpg

Yes, a single white man is possibly going to be charged with genocide, whilst in South Africa the murderous regime continues to kill whites daily:

But we must remember that countries like South Africa have been led to believe that communistic, or at least socialist policies are the answer. In South Africa “equality of outcome” has caused the destruction of the country. When you quota employment by skin colour, you cannot choose the best workers. But communists and socialists don’t think that way:

communism murder.jpg

And as such, there is new gun-control legislation being brought in in South Africa, just, presumably, in time for the “expropriation without compensation” (i.e. theft) of white’s properties.

gun control works

The figure there is too low, but never mind – the point is true. Only dictators who want to kill millions of people want an unarmed populace.

Finally, this video from Zachary Bauer is worth a watch. We really need to be ready, because trouble is coming. Lech lecha – get yourself out!

Zach’s comments about viewing the situation like a chess game, and trying to work out things several moves ahead is wise. There are many out there who will tell you a lot of doom and gloom, but the actual moves are more predictable. We can be sure that legislation will be used against us in the future, and that we need to be prepared to flee.

God Bless you

Lis

Tragic: Another man murdered for his organs – Bored Panda uses this for pro-donate propaganda

The family of Daniel Bassillo have recently shared their pride that their family member was vivisected for his organs, which are reputed to be helping other people. Their tragedy is now being used to further the cause of medical murder. Organ donation is firstly not a donation (because informed consent was not obtained), and secondly requires the victim to be alive when their organs are harvested – hence why it is medical murder.

I quote: (Link)

“We didn’t even hesitate when they asked us if we wanted to donate. I don’t even think we really had to talk about it,” Alexa told Bored Panda. “I pray that you don’t lose the most important person in your life but if you can at the very least take that and turn it into something good.. why wouldn’t you want to do that?” she added.

Why? Because if your brother had usable organs, he was still alive. Alive! He wasn’t dead when his organs were removed, and he may not even have been given an anaesthetic before he was cut open. Just horrifying!

The family showed online the letter they received, telling them how many people the doctors were able to help after they murdered her brother:

organs.jpg

I quote: (Link)

One cannot determine with certainty what organ donors feel, if anything, while being harvested. The logic of brain death goes like this: If the brain stem is dead, then the higher centers of the brain are also probably dead, and if the whole brain is 
dead, then everything beneath the brain stem is no longer relevant. Since in practice only the brain stem is routinely tested, the vast majority of the body, everything above the brain stem and everything below, no longer counts as human.

The reason for denying beating-heart cadavers anesthetic during the removal of their organs is hard to pin down. (Some experts say it is because anesthetic will harm the organs.) Nevertheless, administering anesthetics to BHCs during organ harvests is becoming more common in Europe, according to Robert Truog, professor of medical ethics, anesthesia, and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. Despite their strong opposition to brain death, Truog and Shewmon both refuse to acknowledge the possibility that some donors may be in severe pain during organ harvests, even though they acknowledge that some donors did exhibit reactions similar to inadequately anesthetized surgical patients who afterward reported pain and consciousness. Shewmon said the donor reactions were simply “bodily reactions to noxious stimuli.” I asked if an experiment could be designed to answer the question of pain in donors. He said no.

Truog did not even want to discuss the possibility of pain in the organ donor. But when I suggested experiments along the lines suggested by other anesthesiologists—when BHCs show pain reactions during a harvest, administer anesthetic to see if the reactions subside—he surprised me by saying he had already done this. He has used two different kinds of anesthetics that do not harm organs to quell symptoms such as high blood pressure or heart rate. “Just because the symptoms come down, though,” he added, “does not mean the patient is in pain. Pain is a subjective thing.” As with Shewmon, I asked Truog if an experiment wasn’t called for. He said there was no experiment that could answer the question of pain in the donor.

Would Daniel have lived if he’d been kept on life support? Would he have recovered? We’ll never know. But we do know that this poor man was killed for his organs – that his heart was beating independently when he was being harvested. We know that this barbaric practice is shrowded in secrecy and that most people are ignorant of the truth of what organ “donation” entails.

Always say no to organ donation – do not “donate” or accept organs from murdered people for yourself or a family member. This secretive practice in which linguistic confabulation and misdirection is used to obtain “consent” for the abhorrent human sacrifice of one living person for other living people can only be stopped if we share that knowledge far and wide.

Your organs will not be taken AFTER your death, and Daniel Basillo’s organs were not, either.

I pray that he felt no pain.

May the fear of God bring you into all wisdom.

Lis