Wolf, Franklin Graham, leading his flock to the Mark of the beast

Franklin Graham, son of the late Billy Graham, is pro-vaccine.

Now I’m going to state here that if you have an entirely simplistic notion of vaccination, along the lines of giving the body a weakened virus to help it recognise it in the future, and teach your immune system in readiness for that encounter, then it can be forgiven – ignorant though that view is. The fact is that vaccines are a witches brew of absolute filth and abominations – dog kidney cells, monkey viruses and mouse DNA which should NEVER be put in your body under any circumstances. That’s before we mention the adjuvants like mercury, which are so harmful. Perhaps Franklin Graham is not aware of that, but then I would be pretty sure that Franklin also eats ham sandwiches, and enjoys a pork roast every now and then too. He was a wolf before these latest comments.

I quote: (Link)

Samaritan’s Purse CEO and president, world-wide evangelical leader, and son of the late great Billy Graham, Rev. Franklin Graham is an advocate for telling Christians to take the COVID-19 vaccine. Graham recently revealed in an interview that he has taken the vaccine. […] “I believe it is consistent with Scripture that we protect our lives and do whatever we can to save life,” Franklin Graham said. “So I don’t have any problem with telling a person to take an aspirin or telling a person to have a vaccine.” […]

The evangelist who heavily supported President Trump and his efforts to fast track a vaccine during his presidency warned against vaccines that used aborted fetal cells. He said, “I would be concerned with something we used fetal cells from a murdered child, but Moderna and Pfizer, we’ve been told from the scientists, the way they produce that vaccine these things [aborted fetal cells] were not used.”

I’m glad that he is against the use of aborted foetal cells, but the fact is that IF Franklin Graham believed his bible and took the time to examine the science, he could NEVER advocate for vaccines because if they don’t use human cell lines (which we know is wrong) it uses those of unclean animals – mouse and monkey cell lines.

IF Franklin Graham believed his bible, he wouldn’t eat pork, nor would he worship on Sundays, the God he claims as his own. No, he would preach repentance AND obedience, and his flock would NOT take a vaccine which contained filth, NOR would they be bamboozled into taking one which is genetically modified – which he seems to have no issues with.

Franklin Graham is just another lawless wolf, proclaiming Christ and leading his flock to the lake of fire. Don’t be taken in by him.

God Bless you


Did the German government really plan “repressive measures” and seek the science to back them?

In a startling revelation from Germany, it seems that the government sought the science to fit its agenda regarding instituting repressive measures on Covid-19.

The Federal Ministry of the Interior engaged scientists from several research institutes and universities for political purposes in the first wave of the corona pandemic in March 2020. It commissioned the researchers from the Robert Koch Institute and other institutions to create a calculation model, on the basis of which the Ministry of the Interior Horst Seehofer (CSU) wanted to justify tough corona measures.

This emerges from more than 200 pages of internal correspondence between the management level of the Ministry of the Interior and the researchers, which WELT AM SONNTAG has received. A group of lawyers fought for e-mail in a legal dispute with the Robert Koch Institute that lasted several months.

In an exchange of e-mails, the State Secretary in the Ministry of the Interior, Markus Kerber, asks the researchers who have been contacted to develop a model on the basis of which “preventive and repressive measures” can be planned.

According to the correspondence, the scientists worked in close coordination with the ministry in just four days to develop content for a paper that had been declared secret, which was distributed via various media over the following days.

A “worst case scenario” was calculated according to which more than a million people in Germany could die of the coronavirus if social life were to continue as it was before the pandemic.

Archive.org Link

This revelation begs the question, did Boris Johnson do the same? Why choose the already discredited Prof. Neil Ferguson – a man whose previous modelling has proven to be wrong over and over again? Why put together a committee (SAGE) with a disproportionate number of behaviourial scientists and pharma shills, rather than epidemiologists and virologists?

I’m sure the truth will out at some point. In the meantime, you wil need to draw your own conclusions.

This Italian MP certainly has, and I commend her for speaking out. Please watch and share.

May God have mercy on us.


Is the new mRNA vaccine safe?

Define the word “safe” please.

Safe as in you don’t die or have a serious, debilitating reaction to it? Safe as in you take it and nothing happens at all? How do you define safe?


Does that sound safe? Being infertile?


There are dozens of other examples at this link – all anecdotal, mostly first hand accounts.

But it’s safe for seniors, right?


Is it safe for 30 year olds?


Is it safe for anyone?

The son of the lady above wrote:


And below is what the FDA says – from their own website:


Finally let’s consider the safety of being genetically altered:

In those days men will seek death and will not find it; they will desire to die, and death will flee from them.

Revelation 9:6 NKJV

Wanting to make you in their own image, scientists think that genetically altering you is a good thing. That’s exactly what this vaccine does, and if you don’t believe me, read their own words: https://www.pfizer.co.uk/behind-science-what-mrna-vaccine

I think it’s terrifying. I would honestly steer clear of the vaccinated because of this.

The important question is: “Does God want you to take this vaccine?”

Well, you can have His mark, or you can have the Mark of the Beast. That’s most likely where we are now. If you trust in Him you will walk in faith. If you trust in the scientists, you will be at their mercy.

I pray you will choose rightly.


Worldwide Nazification

Are we there yet?

Germany in the 1930’s, I mean. It’s all too close, and my fellow Brits are all too happy to be part of the Stasi which we always believed to be a trait of the German character, or a fault of the Soviet system – we connected it to the otherness of a different nation, and not to our own. What fools we’ve been to think so kindly of our fellow countrymen!

The use of fear as a tactic for oppression has a long history. We can go back to the cults who told worshippers of false gods to sacrifice their children to appease those gods. We can go back to the superstitions of old regarding diseases. We can go back to Nazi Germany to see the fear the state deliberately induced in its people to get them to bend to the wills of evil men.

Here are some quotes I want you to look at and consider the source. Are we there now? Are we in 1930’s Germany about to herd “anti-maskers” and “anti-vaxxers” into gas chambers, or internment camps? I fear we are exactly there, and that we have learned nothing. Take a look, my words continue below.








When I see the lies in the press about Trump, when I see the lies in the press about Coronavirus, I remind myself that they’ve been lying to us all along – that when they told us about “brave” transgendered teens they were sowing seeds of lies into the minds of the credulous. That every story has a slant – that every fact reported is reported with carefuly crafted arrows towards some intended outcome in the public mind. That the continued degradation of our people has been accomplished by the polished words of journalists and politicians who have no business controlling our thoughts, or directing our paths.

It is for God to do that!

The government have quite possibly not used the press to control the people so much in these times of coronavirus, but the press has used the people to control the government. That the public has been whipped up into such absolute terror that people are begging for draconian rules to control *points* – those people over there who won’t wear a mask, who won’t take a filthy untested vaccine.

We are in the thrall of terrorists.

It’s time to call Boris and his chums what they are – terrorists. It’s time to call SAGE a “government-backed terrorist group”, and the press “organs of propaganda” which have reduced a one-great nation to a crowd of gibbering fools. We should label those who go along with the anti-freedom messages of these terrorists “co-religionists” and be done with it. The press wouldn’t hesitate to label “others” in those terms – again promoting the idea that those who behave with evil intent are *points* – those people over there, rather than our “home-grown terrorists” that we are currently in the vice-like grip of.

The one bright spot in all this is the continued lack of compliance from so many people. However much the press is trying to whip up hatred towards those people, it’s not really working, and most people are content to apply the rules as they see fit, when it suits them. That may be a sign for hope.

But more and more we are seeing erosions of our freedoms which we may never get back, and the coercion that the public has been put under to be genetically modified with an untested genetic therapy (NOT a vaccine), is a breach of human rights.

The press have publicised in great detail exactly how the “vaccine” works and then villified anyone who then claims that it genetically modifies people – which it clearly does.

We are in a constant state of cognitive dissonance – we can see the truth all around us (I still don’t know anyone who has had this virus, do you?), yet we are bombarded with propaganda and fear-mongering reports all day long. If you ignored the press would you even know there was a pandemic going on? No, you wouldn’t, because there isn’t!

So where do we go from here? How do we get back our freedoms?

I’d like to say that mass disobedience is the way forward, but that will only push this regime onto another footing. That message is a popular one. We must turn to God and press into Him in faith that AS WE OBEY His precious Torah He will bless us, and the weight of curses on us will be taken away.

As one who has kept Torah for some years – gradually learning what I need to do to be pleasing to the Most High God, I can say that although I have seen oppression all around me, it has not touched me the way it could have. I am so grateful for that.

God is good, all the time, and His ways are the ways of righteousness which our Messiah walked in. If you will not walk in His ways, you are doomed to walk in the oppression of this age – and remain under the thumb of people like Goebbels.

God Bless you


Should there be a moratorium on all robot law enforcement?

The simple answer is yes, because this, from Japan, might look and sound cute:

…and you might like to believe that these sweet and innocent-sounding robots are harmless helpers of mankind. We’ve all seen movies like Terminator, and Elysium:

We can pretend that is fiction, but what was fiction could soon be our worst nightmare:

If that doesn’t send a chill through you, then to have no imagination. To be faced with that, with the power to kill you, crush you, destroy you?

Yes, it’s time to call for a moratorium on all robot law enforcement.

God Bless you


Green Sabbath: Sunday Lockdowns for “Gaia” and Jubilee for the Earth

This is a must see video – please watch and share. It’s time to wake up.

God Bless you


“Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”

I’m tired of this old aphorism being trotted out to in relation to the covid crisis – a crisis which required a decisive response at the start but which is now entirely a crisis continued, maintained and extended by government. It’s no longer a stupid government mistake, and whereas it was perfectly possible to forgive the miscalculation at the beginning of the crisis, it is no longer feasible to accept the continuing nonsense when deaths are now so low.

The problem now is how to end this situation. It’s not going to happen at the ballot box – another tired aphorism is this:

People in the UK voted for Boris because of Brexit. We never thought that he’d prove to be so inept – I would say it would be far fairer to say “you buy the product you’re sold, not the product you get” – in the case of this government we were sold a lie.

Whilst Brexit was sort of done, the covid crisis has been handled with such ineptitude that it can only be viewed as the willful destruction of this nation’s economy – and people still have no clue how serious it is. Redundancies are going to come in the next month as the furlough scheme ends, and they fully intend to lock everyone down again on the basis of test results not hospital admissions. This nefarious group of knaves has got their eye on the prize.

That prize is the total control of you and me.

With a destroyed economy they may have us all on benefits – a form of UBI (Universal Basic Income). Is it a coincidence that our main national benefit is called “universal credit” – that doesn’t seem so far from China’s “social credit score” either, does it?

And that’s what this boils down to. Once we’re all dependent, we won’t be able to resist so easily – don’t want a vaccine, then no benefits for you! They want us all to eat less meat, for the sake of the environment – you won’t be able to afford meat! Want to protest? That’s a £10,000 fine.

This country is no longer a democracy and many people are loving that – they can’t wait to get this over with, and believe something like this:

And now the government is calling upon a nation of bored and tetchy stasi to dob in their neighbours if they have seven people in their garden instead of six, threatening a criminal record for those who get caught.


What have we become? This is not desperation in the face of a serious threat, this is coercion in the face of a manufactured crisis in which you or I could be threatened with arrest for not wearing a mask which will do nothing to protect us or anyone else. We could be hauled before the courts for failing to limit a family gathering to the required six people.

This is about control. It’s not about a virus, and it’s not about safety. It’s about seeing how compliant you are willing to be – what your social credit score will be when they’ve got you 100% at their mercy.

Believe me they want you to be 100% at their mercy.

If you have not written to your MP, please do so today.

If you have not written to the Prime Minister, please do so (you won’t get a reply, but enough comments in volume, politely pointing out that this is unacceptable will help).

Subscribe to the Lockdown Sceptics site for a daily newsletter to be kept up to date on what is happening with vital court cases related to the crisis.

Speak or be silenced.

We’re already being silenced – I tried to post part of this quote on an article yesterday in the Daily Mail:

This was the headline:

This was my comment:

Needless to say it did not appear amongst the other moderated comments.

May God help us!


Is Boris trying to destroy Britain?

The simple answer is yes, if yesterday’s back-track into a new level of lockdown is anything to go by. We are now limited to no more than six people meeting together, either publicly or privately.

There we go, down the toilet – the whole economy is teetering on the brink of total meltdown and he’s talking about testing and case numbers. The public are increasingly uneasy about the ever-changing and more and more ridiculous rules. None of the government’s rules make sense under the circumstances, yet there they are. Suppressing a virus which you need a test to know you have is ridiculous, but now we have to face restrictions being imposed for these cases when no restriction is needed.

Is it the same where you are? What have you done about this injustice? What can you do?

You can write to your MP or representative – politely point out your views and tell them what you want them to do – they work for you.

You can write to the Prime Minister, or President of your country – tell them what you think, again politely. Tell them what you want them to do, or ask them to explain what they are doing. I did this with Boris Johnson, and although I doubt I will get a response, I have done what I could do. Please would you do the same?

Get involved in protests where it is possible for you to do so (obviously not in Australia right now, which is knee-deep in Orwell’s 1984 and it’s gettin’ higher).

If you can’t visit a protest, you can still write to your MP to tell them you stand with the protests – that’s what I did.

You can also get involved in consultations – this one is about the UK government’s aims to release, administer and promote unlicensed vaccines. I told them in no uncertain terms that I wouldn’t support that and why.

We have all got to do what we can. Each one of us may feel like we’re alone, spitting in the wind. But if we all spit in the wind it’ll make a storm that can’t be ignored!

We must stand up to this tyranny in every way we can – in every capacity. We must say what we think and how we feel if we stand any chance of stopping this terrible situation which should never have happened. We’re being lied to every single day by the government and by the media – the agenda at hand is nothing to do with a virus and everything to do with control.

God Bless you


Just in case you thought your organs weren’t worth protecting…

I’ve heard the argument that it’s not worth making the effort (effort???) to opt out of organ donation now, because if you’re old they won’t want your organs – believe me, murdering the elderly is right up there on the elite’s to do list, and they’re working on ways to make your old “unviable” organs viable again for transplantation right now. The following is from the Daily Mail (link at the end of the quote). My comments are added in bold.

Despite the lack of organs available for patients on transplant waitlists, organs from older, deceased donors are frequently thrown away. (No such thing as a deceased donor unless it’s for non vital organs. This kind of “deceased” is a made up notion that neither you nor Joe Bloggs in the street would think of as “death”)

But a new study suggests organs from elderly donors can be ‘rejuvenated’ by making them ‘younger.’

Researchers say anti-aging drugs can ‘turn back the clock’ on hearts, livers, kidneys and lungs by getting rid of cells that are linked to organ rejection in transplant patients. […]

‘Older organs are available and have the potential to contribute to mitigating the current demand for organ transplantation,’ said corresponding author Dr Stefan Tullius, chief of the Division of Transplant Surgery at the Brigham.

‘If we can utilize older organs in a safe way with outcomes that are comparable, we will take a substantial step forward for helping patients.’  […]

But, in new research published in the journal Nature Communications, the team demonstrated the effect of a class of drugs called senolytics, which target and eliminate old cells.   

As organs age, a group of cells called senescent cells tend to accumulate. Because they no longer divide like younger cells do, the body doesn’t go about destroying them.

What’s more, senescent cells release cell-free mitochondrial DNA (mt-DNA), which is recognized by the immune system and activates an inflammatory reaction.

Studies in the past have linked this process to organ rejection. 

But using senolytic drugs will force senescent cells back into a regular cycle so they can split and the body will get rid of them.

The researchers tested this theory in old mice with a combination of the senolytic drugs dasatinib and quercetin. […]

He hopes the drugs organs can be effectively with senolytic drugs after they are harvested from a donor.

‘We have not yet tested the effects clinically, but we are well prepared to take the next step toward clinical application by using a perfusion device to flow senolytic drugs over organs and measure whether or not there are improvements in levels of senescent cells,’ he said. (Link)

So here we have the elderly being used as spare parts – you will note that the drugs used to reverse the signs of ageing are not being given to LIVING patients to help them live. The drugs used (including the supplement quercetin, which you can buy and take for yourself) are being used on living mice in the experiment, and they are planning to try to perfuse harvested organs with them in order to get this benefit pre-transplant. How long before they decide to just keep the patient on life support and give them the drugs to make the organs healthier prior to harvest? They are a bunch of murderous quacks, so nothing would surprise me. All it takes is an “ethicist” who doesn’t have any moral qualms, like perhaps this lady, and anything is possible?

As a quick final note, I’ll add here that the elderly – talking to, listening to and recognising the wisdom of the elderly, is one of the things the elites want to banish from our society. They have done everything they can to harm as many old people as possible through this Covid nonsense. How can you have a “Year Zero” approach to changing society if the elderly can still be heard, and their wisdom and experience listened to? This talk of a Great Reset – it’s not a reset, people, it’s the great leap forward, and will cause just as many deaths, if not more. These communist ideologies require us to jettison our past, our history and the elderly are the bearers of that knowledge and understanding. Without them, we have the child soldiers of the Khmer Rouge.

I pray I’m wrong, but history repeats, and the devilish communist ideology continues to fascinate the ungodly in their hopes to take as many people as possible to hell with them.

If you are in the UK and you’re ready to opt out, here’s the link – you are not the property of the state! Protect your organs. https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/register-your-decision/refuse-to-donate/

May God Bless you