Rape is sex without consent.

I knew this day would come. I kept my mouth shut hoping that it would not. Hoping that if I didn’t say anything, it would just not come to be, but I watched, and I knew that this was likely.

Then I saw this headline today, and I knew that day had come. In fact it had come last year when the article was first published. Damnit!

trans 1.jpg

And of course you all know where this leads. Firstly this is homosexual rape – no one has the right to have sex with you under a fake identity (and especially when that fake identity would cause you to commit a mortal sin in the eyes of God). This is non consensual sex – this is rape. Tragically this also leads to this:

vile sin.jpg

This trans person, who clearly expects all the tolerance and understanding in the world, cannot see how someone might feel raped if they had unwittingly had homosexual sex???? It’s rape, plain and simple – it’s a total misrepresentation of who a person is.

If you don’t know what “cis” gendered is, by the way, it means natural (as God intended). Yes, they’re even trying to label and marginalise us now!

So whilst I do not condone violence in any shape or form, I do believe that this is a vile sin against a person and rape indeed if the gender has been changed (because your birth sex and chromosomes can NEVER be changed!).

The writer goes on:

“Thus, not being attracted to trans people is deeply transphobic. The entire notion that someone isn’t attracted to a group of very physically diverse group of people because they are trans is built on fear and disgust of trans people. None of this means it is transphobic to not be attracted to individual trans people. Nor is it transphobic to not be attracted to specific genitals. But it is transphobic to claim to not be attracted to all trans, people. For example, there is a difference between saying you won’t go out with someone for having a penis and saying you won’t go out with someone because they’re trans.

So when a cis person argues that a trans person has an obligation to come out to someone before dating them, they are saying trans people have an obligation to accommodate their transphobia. Plus, claiming that trans people are obligated to come out reinforces the idea that not being attracted to trans people is reasonable. But as I’ve pointed out, not being attracted to trans people supports the idea that transness is disgusting which is the basis for transphobic oppression.”

[…] The one scenario in which I would say a trans person should disclose their trans status is if they are going to have sex with someone and are unsure if their partner is attracted to whatever genitals they may have. In that case, I think it’s courteous for a trans person to come out to avoid any awkwardness during sex. But even then, a trans person isn’t “lying” if they don’t come out and their partner is certainly not being “raped.” [Really?!]

It is easy to look at the story of Jennifer Laude and claim that her death was due to the actions of one bigot. But it’s more complicated than that. Pemberton was the product of a society that told him that disgust towards trans people was reasonable and natural. So when he found out that he accidentally slept with a trans woman, he killed her. (Link)

First of all the writer makes the mistake of thinking that attraction is the basis for a sexual relationship. Attraction is one basis, but the primary basis is CONSENT! You do not have that persons consent to have homosexual sex with them! Tell me how would a lesbian feel if they found out they’s just had sex with a trans woman? Might they say this was wrong and they didn’t consent to have sex with someone who is genetically MALE!?

The rights of the trans person to privacy DO NOT and can NEVER trump the rights of their partner to CONSENT to a homosexual act – which is what this is (or a heterosexual encounter, as described above).

I warn you now that the day will come when Trans people will demand this right mooted in the article – they will demand the right to not reveal who they are. And sadly this will lead to more terrible crimes of violence, and worse – people will be condemned by God for the sin of homosexuality which is a sin unto death.

Maranatha!

God Bless you

Lis

Irony after irony – a news round-up!

Turn the irony dial up to 11, please! This is unbelievable.

Yesterday thousands of Americans took to the streets to stand against sharia law. They have the right to protest, no? Of course, they do!

Anti-fa protesters say these marches were really anti-muslim, and so got into some serious scuffles with the anti-sharia protesters. These placards should tell you everything you need to know about the future of America if it does not turn back to God FULLY!

islam

Firstly, I’ll address the irony (which indeed is not even funny) of anti-fa coming out to attack, and thus silence free speech, which is their aim. How very… fascist… of them!

In amongst the protesters there were homosexuals who were standing against sharia because they, rightly, fear for their lives under sharia law. Anti-fa apparently didn’t want their gay leftist chums to live after all?!

homsexuality

But the ultimate irony, for me, is that America and Europe are about to be subsumed by a tide of sharia because it is God’s judgement on a lawless generation.

Most ironic image of the whole article:

sharia

Please note that ‘Liberty’ is really semiramis (Libertas of the Romans). So here we have ‘Liberty’ supporting a woman who under muslim rule would have to cover. No liberty for her, huh? Yes, but muslims have the RIGHT to CHOOSE to be oppressed! (No, because if they leave islam, they are apostates, and can be killed). Different God to ours – and the world (and a lot of Christians) just don’t get it!.

Secondly, I also note that Justin Welby, our Archbishop of Canterbury, has rebuked African bishops for consecrating a new traditionalist bishop in the wake of Scotland’s Episcopal church’s decision to allow gay marriage in their churches. THIS – THIS, people, is the great apostasy. The last remnants of churches who clung, hypocritically, to a few laws like ‘homosexuality is a sin’ are now releasing themselves entirely from God’s Law, whilst still claiming they belong to God. It is an affront.

Justin Welby’s comment:

“Welby said in his letter to Anglican leaders across the 80 million-strong worldwide Communion that there was no need for a missionary bishop in the Church of England because worshippers could already express a range of views.”

So, in Welby’s view the sheep don’t need a shepherd at all – they can perfectly well make up their own minds what to believe. Frankly, no wonder so few of us are in any church whatsoever!

And in a finally irony – oh this one should have you clapping your hands with an ounce, at least, of joy. Our lame-duck Prime Minister, Theresa May, is having her government shored up by what the world calls “BIGOTS”! Yay!

Yes, the DUP – Ireland’s Christian party, started by blood and thunder preacher, Ian Paisley, is now Theresa’s only hope to form a government. This would be like your lovely Mr Trump retaining his government with the help of Westboro Baptist Church (in the eyes of the world, at least). Can you see how the left are going to riot over this? I mean actual bible believing Christians, holding the balance of power in Westminster? Goodness me – we must be back in the dark ages, say many!

So I take this last irony as hope – if Theresa May can form a coalition government with the DUP then we may get a few things which we want through government. The DUP has never been in a better position to press for reform. Of course the people don’t want this, and will rebel against it. The likely scenario is that Theresa May will be ousted. Which will, ironically, mean that yet again we are to be governed by a leader we didn’t vote for. It is also risky for the Tories (conservatives) because Labour are ready and willing to form a minority government too.

It is very unlikely this government can last. So look out for an election re-run (this last one cost, I believe £143,000,000) in the next few months.

On one final serious note. PRAY!

God says in 2 Chronicles 7:14:

“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”

We must turn back from lawlessness. We must return to God as a people, with our whole heart if we are to receive His protection, His love, and His blessings.

God Bless you

Lis

UK General Election 2017

I am happy to announce that Theresa May – Britain’s worst Prime Minister to date – has blown her majority. Her gamble – that the electorate would give her a bigger majority on the back of our desire for Brexit, has backfired. In fact I suspect that was the plan all along. Why do I say that? British Armed Forces continue to be more and more closely integrated into Europe, despite Article 50 having been triggered. Those in the know suspected that she had no intention of us leaving the EU – perhaps they were right. For me, knowing the manifesto commitments of both Conservative and Labour parties, I am glad neither has power. Watch out for another election (or a coalition) very shortly!

For many who voted for Corbyn – a true Socialist (Marxist!) if ever there was one – the most painful issue of the greatest concern was the state of our health service.

The NHS has been funded ‘at record levels’ according to the conservatives, while in real terms it’s receiving less than a third of the funding per person than it was in the 1970s. Out of that also comes payments for privately built PPI hospitals, which have turned out to be a massive cash-cow for those who built them, and leased them to the state. I have heard of hospitals being forced to pay over £600 to get a lightbulb changed! It’s in the contract!

So why do I mention the NHS? Because I want you to listen to this interview that Brian Gerrish has done with a whistleblower on how the NHS is killing our elderly. I’ve written before about the Liverpool ‘Care’ Pathway (which was supposedly banned). No, it still continues, and patients are dying under very worrying conditions. This interview will leave you with more questions than answers – is funding the real issue? Does the NHS need an injection of cash, or compassion? Where is the care for the sick and elderly.

Please listen and share with everyone you know – particularly if they are in the UK. We have bigger problems than just who is in charge, or how much tax we pay – we have a crisis of CARE – which must, surely, be a spiritual problem.

God Bless you

Lis

Planned Parenthood’s satanic agenda rolls on

Just when I thought the tide of evil from this organisation was beginning to be stemmed by Pro-Life messages, and Donald Trump, I found out that Planned Parenthood now have another income stream in the pipeline.

Gender reassignment.

Yes, you heard that right. Perhaps you already knew, but I found this out only a couple of days ago by reading Twitter, and it began with this ridiculous piece of propaganda:

gender.jpg

Let’s do away with male and female and replace them with…? Nevermind – I’m preaching to the choir here. Then I saw this in the replies:

pp agenda

I thought, “WHOA! What?”

So I did a bit of digging, and it’s true. (Source)

planned parenthood.jpg

Planned Parenthood – an organisation which is supposed to provide family planning, yet pushes abortion, well, now it’s showing even more it’s true colours. This is a satanic organisation, bent on pushing whatever the leftists (really, they are Marxists) want to make popular. Of course this is going to be very profitable, and surely (and please correct me if I’m wrong) the states provide at least some funding to these Planned Parenthood offices from taxpayers money? This is, yet again, not what America needs to be doing.

God doesn’t make mistakes. Elites with a sinister agenda are behind this. Pollution is part of it, and media hype is also. Read more:

Transgender issues linked to anti-depressants

So what antidepressant was Steven on when he decided to become a woman?

Another danger of the transgender push

God Bless you

Lis

Britain’s grinning police state

Ugh!

In the wake of the Manchester bombing (which raised more questions than I care to try to address), we suddenly had armed police on the streets. Do you remember France doing the same thing after the Paris bombing? Yep. Do you also realise that ever since, there has always been some kind of ‘terror incident’ just prior to the date upon which such special measures were due to end? I hope that does not happen in this case – armed police are due to leave our streets on Monday night.

So let’s take a look at the photos of the police state as it flexes it’s oh-so-friendly muscles, shall we? I mean, who doesn’t want to experience the joy of a policeman with an automatic weapon smiling and blowing kisses to members of the public? Who wouldn’t want to be made safe by such ‘delightful’ and ‘friendly’ people? Huh?

safety police state

police state

Smiling police reassuring thousands? What about Jean Charles De Menezes? You must go and read that piece – it highlights the very reasons why more police on our streets, and specifically ones with guns, is NOT a reassuring sign.

The issue that will not be dealt with is the issue of Islam. Saudi Wahhabism has infiltrated many mosques in Britain, funded by the Saudis who then appoint the imams who are radicalising the young. Why was this ever allowed to take place?

Why have we got security forces assisting in this radicalisation – our own secret services have been accused of radicalising wives of muslim men in the UK, who then left to go and fight in Syria. How crazy is that? What are they doing? Why is this happening?

Because you must cow and weaken and make afraid the white native folks of this country if you want to bring in totalitarianism and Agenda 2030 (which has little to do with the environment, and everything to do with the management, control and selection/genocide of mankind). You simply can’t institute this kind of evil in a free and just society!

But in the wake of the Manchester incident, we see that people are calling for ‘something’ to be done.

change

‘Something’ – because it’s hard to define what we want. We want safety, and we are far from acheiving that again without some serious action.

careful.jpg

But we need to be very careful what we wish for. As I’ve written before, We risk our own freedoms every time we call for the freedoms of others around us to be curbed. Read: How to close an open society – UK version

We risk, in fact, disproportionate action against ourselves in our own land, as we call for ‘something’ to be done. How about these snippets from here: How long before UK resembles Venezuela?

venezuela
Venezuela

Preventive repression. We are not far from that:

britain
Britain

And indeed, Tommy Robinson has received numerous death threats from muslims, which Bedfordshire police have failed to take action over, yet we have people (white people, I might add) who are serving jail time for throwing bacon at a mosque.

That is what we risk, as we cry for ‘safety’ – and in fact the very notion that we, as white British people in our own country, will be safer if muslims are locked up, is simply false. They were allowed here to accomplish a goal for the NWO. It wasn’t a result of a failed experiment that we were bombed on Monday. It was the result of a plot – one of satan’s own – to bring down our people all across Europe. To persecute us, and destroy our way of life.

Grinning ‘friendly’ armed police on our streets is just an early symptom of the coming police state.

It is time to get right with God. Time is ticking on, and we don’t know when Yeshua will return. As we see the incredible acceleration of evil across the western world, we must be ready with oil in our lamps. We must be prepared in every way, but above all spiritually. Our faith must be strong.

God Bless you

Lis

Oh Melania!

Now I like the first lady of the USA. She seems pretty savvy, and I was impressed that she didn’t automatically bow to the tradition of wearing a head scarf to meet the Saudis. Good on her, I thought.

And then this happened:

tweet melania

Yes, she wore a veil to honour the pope. And she wore black (again, to honour the pope). Hmmm, I thought!

melania ivanka

Here we have Melania and Ivanka (who is Jewish) honouring the pope!

One might ask why! Today we see the headline:

melania catholic

Uh, no. Nope. No. If Melania was a Catholic, she would have worn white when meeting the pope:

catholic meets pope at vatican
Princess Charlene of Monaco, dressed in white
cherie blair catholic
Cherie Blair, dressed in white

Non catholics wear black. Even our Queen:

queen black veil
Our protestant queen, dressed in black

This signifies that our queen knows that she is under papal rule (as are we all!).

So what is going on with Melania? I can only say how disappointed I am to see her honour the pope – a NWO, one-world-religion pushing hypocrite. She has gone down in my estimation immensely.

What are your thoughts?

God Bless you

Lis

 

The Manchester bombing – an assault on freedom

I opened Twitter this morning to see a tweet from the Russian Embassy, giving an emergency number out, with the hashtag #Manchester. It didn’t sink in straight away. Another tweet was talking about the UK’s reaction to Manchester. Oh no. Another attack?

Sadly, yes. This time, apart from the deeply occult “22 deaths on the 22nd May” I cannot see anything so far in the images I’ve seen which suggests this was faked in any way. Perhaps this time it was real terror, perhaps it was a set up. Either way, it suits evil Theresa May and her nightmarish vision of ‘security’.

You see, the media claim that four hours prior to the bomb blast, there were posts on Twitter by Isis connected accounts, which mentioned both terror and Manchester Arena.

manchester 1.png

Further down the page:

manchester 2

And the Daily Mail’s comments:

manchester 3

Be aware here – note the use of language. First of all they could tweet out about an up-coming terror attack, apparently. Then, although Twitter suspended many accounts, they state that “other euphoric supporters posted messages across Telegram and other secured messaging systems”. In other words – encryption is bad. Only bad people want to use secured messaging. Nothing about stopping bad people from coming to our country, no, and as I’ve written before, it is the perfect way to shut down an open society. People are clamouring for more security in the wake of this!

manchester 5.jpg

More security necessary? Why not have a full TSA style pat-down? Or real-time phone tapping? The problem here is Islam, but at this rate we will have to have that TSA style pat-down to go into a shopping centre. Is that what we want? NO! We want fewer terrorists (real or FAKE). More security doesn’t solve this problem.

But the narrative continues at the Daily Mail:

manchester 4

Yes, Theresa May’s plan for a new, regulated, internet – well, it’s clearly necessary, isn’t it? I mean – freedom? What do you want that for – freedom allows dangerous people to hurt your feelings, or worse, blow you up! Freedom is dangerous in the wrong hands. Apparently.  I quote from the above linked article (censored, ironically, for profanity 😉 ):

 

“We will put a responsibility on industry not to direct users – even unintentionally – to hate speech, pornography, or other sources of harm. We will make clear the responsibility of platforms to enable the reporting of inappropriate, bullying, harmful or illegal content, with take-down on a comply-or-explain basis.

Basically: we will make private internet companies our internet censorship police, or we’ll fine them millions of dollars. This will create all sorts of unnecessary problems. First, to avoid liability, companies will massively over-censor. We see this happen all the time. All sorts of perfectly fine and legitimate content will be censored just to avoid the potential liability. Second, this will be massively expensive. Sure, Facebook and Google can probably handle the expense, but no one else will be able to. If you’re trying to start the next Facebook or Google in the UK, you’re f****d. You can’t afford to police all the content on your platform, nor can you afford the potential liability. Probably best to just move somewhere else. Third, does the UK government really want private platforms like Google and Facebook making these determinations? Why is it handing off the responsibility of what kind of speech is “illegal” to private, for-profit companies (foreign companies, at that)?”

So, whilst I have immense sympathy for anyone caught up in the Manchester bombing, and feel that, of course, something needs to be done, I have no confidence in our government to not simply use this incident to further it’s own policy agenda. It’s convenient, in that it will allow the narrative of ‘more security’ to trump the calls for fewer migrants!

Another quote from the same article:

“In addition, we do not believe that there should be a safe space for terrorists to be able to communicate online and will work to prevent them from having this capability.

And this may be the most terrifying line of all here. That’s the dog whistle for “we’ll outlaw encryption” because encryption — in the minds of foolish, scaredy-cat politicians — creates “safe spaces” for terrorists. Nevermind that the same encryption creates “safe” spaces for every other person and that undermining that makes absolutely everyone less safe. This is a dangerous plan that seems to echo the words of the UK’s Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, from a few months ago, where she wanted to find people who knew the necessary hashtags to silence terrorists online. This isn’t policy making. This is nonsense.”

 

I think this makes that point rather well. We all remember the famous quote:

franklin

I couldn’t have put it better.

Satan’s plan is coming to fruition. Satan’s plan to destroy the people of God (who were once of God, and who now walk contrary to God, whom He divorced for adultery) is going rather too well. The elites, who willingly bowed down to worship satan in return for power and wealth, are all slowly orchestrating satan’s plan. They may think it’s their plan. They may believe this is what they want. But satan is doing just as God allows, and has free rein, up to a point, to bring us to our knees.

And on our knees is where we need to be.

God’s judgement is here. Do you know Christ? Are you saved? Have you repented of your sins? If not, now is the time to get right with God.

God Bless you

Lis