Clicking ‘Like’

I wish there was a button that just said ‘Thank You’ – as in ‘Thank you for telling me this awful thing you just shared.’ Like? No, I hate most of what I’m reading these days, and I’m frequently, frankly SPEECHLESS, but by goodness I am grateful for the bloggers who put time in to check and share the stories and opinions they do.

Keep on keeping on, everyone!

God Bless you



More censorship from the Daily Mail

Media censorship like that found in the previous post in the so called ‘Swedish’ Somalians is rife it would seem. I have been commenting on the Daily Mail for a couple of weeks, and I’ve had quite a few of my comments simply not appear.

I can reveal to you today that your comment will automatically not appear if you mention the name Rothschild, and in addition, I have now tried three times to post on articles related to South Africa, that it is heading towards a genocide of the minority white population. So far none have appeared.

This post is the latest – I thought I would copy this so it appears in full somewhere, even if only here. I’ll be sure to let you know if it appears later today. But I doubt it will…


Do you know of any news sites where you’ve commented and your comments have been censored? Please leave a comment here if so – it would be good to make that censorship public for all to see!

God Bless you


Is Donald Trump’s life in danger? The elites come out and say ‘He must be stopped.’

Mike King of knows his history, so it should come as no surprise to see him break this story (Link), and I quote:

“Published by the Hearst Corporation, Esquire Magazine, though not primarily a political magazine, is clearly aligned with the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class).[…]

What your intrepid reporter and his trusted feline sidekick did, however, find surprising – shocking to be more precise – is what appears to be a cryptic death threat suggested by an Esquire online story posted on February 24, 2016. The headline reads: ‘How to Stop Donald Trump’, and is written by Charles Pierce. It’s a very intriguing headline, but, in and of itself, nothing much to cause alarm.

But just two paragraphs into his hate-filled piece, we find an extended reference to Louisiana Senator Huey Long, the anti-Establishment insurgent who was planning to challenge incumbent President FDR in the 1936 election. From the Esquire article:

“In his magisterial biography of Huey Long… T. Harry Williams explains the thinking behind the long game that the ‘Kingfish’ saw himself playing as the Great Depression played out.

There was no doubt in Long’s mind that that all would go as he had planned it. Of Roosevelt he said scornfully, ‘I can take him. He’s a phony…He’s scared of me. I can outpromise him, and he knows it. People will believe me and they won’t believe him.’

The energy behind the two men is as similar as the parallel is inexact. 

Huey Long … relentlessly vilified the economic and social elite, first in Louisiana and then in the entire country. He, Trump, on the other hand, was a child of that elite, and he had never departed from it, except in his public persona, which is where we find him now. A huge portion of the Republican electorate—and, sadly, a not-insignificant portion of the American people—wants a strongman, the more vulgar the better. Huey Long came by his vulgarity naturally. He, Trump has had to work at it …. I am one of you, they both said, you poorly educated suckers. Look how common and vulgar I am.

There does not appear to be any way to stop him now. Unless something completely untoward happens, He, Trump will be the Republican nominee for president.” […]

The chilling part of Pierce’s hate-fest is not what he wrote about history pertaining to Huey Long, but rather, what he did not write. What Pierce deliberately withheld from his readers, but is certainly already well-known to the PRC, is that Long’s Trump-like rebellion was finally “stopped” by a bullet to his abdomen, followed by some dirty work at the hospital. On September 8, 1935, a Dr. Carl Weiss, we are told, confronted Long and shot him. Rather than take Weiss alive, bodyguards shoot him 60 times. (Dead men tell no tales!)

As the “conspiracy theory” goes, Weiss was just a patsy, set up only to punch Long in the face while a bodyguard actually shot the Senator. Long was rushed to the hospital and died two days later due to what some say is “medical incompetence”. No autopsy was performed (just like none was performed on Justice Antonin Scalia). More than 100,000 mourners attended the funeral of the anti-Wall Street “rock star” who would have been President.””

Esquire magazine is not alone, today we have reports that The Economist has joined in, saying ‘Trump must be stopped.’ You can read the article here: Link, and I quote:

“The things Mr Trump has said in this campaign make him unworthy of leading one of the world’s great political parties, let alone America. One way to judge politicians is by whether they appeal to our better natures: Mr Trump has prospered by inciting hatred and violence. He is so unpredictable that the thought of him anywhere near high office is terrifying. He must be stopped.”

The Economist is a Rothschild owned publication.

I can’t make up my mind is this is all just theatre to keep the likes of me and others distracted and looking for clues (distracting us from what?) or whether Trump is genuinely a threat to the cabal.

My view on Trump is that it makes no difference who is elected president of the United States if the American pople do not turn away from sin! If you don’t turn away from sin, you’ll get the president you deserve. I say that with no delight, but with sadness, knowing that we in the UK are similarly under judgement.

What are your thoughts?

God Bless you


How to bring down Europe in a few easy steps

First of all, bomb the heck out of the Middle East, and send all those fleeing into camps run by the UN and it’s NGO affiliates.

Then stop paying them in the camps so they’ll flee.

Then give them boats (how else did they get them?) and suggest they might like to go to Germany, Sweden and so on! Make sure they have life-jackets (yes, someone is supplying them with free life-jackets.) Basically: support a Muslim invasion of Europe.


Don’t forget to enlist the media to preach that these are ‘refugees’ fleeing a ‘warzone’ (rather than nice safe camps). Make sure when there are losses of life from these dangerous journeys to milk them for all they are worth, rather than facing the fact that these are Muslim invading armies who wish to destroy Europe.

Give them money and entitlements.

This is classic Cloward Piven Strategy. I’ve written about it before here: Link, but I’ll add a quote from there fore you:

“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Inspired by the August 1965 riots in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles (which erupted after police had used batons to subdue a black man suspected of drunk driving), Cloward and Piven published an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. Following its publication, The Nation sold an unprecedented 30,000 reprints. Activists were abuzz over the so-called “crisis strategy” or “Cloward-Piven Strategy,” as it came to be called. Many were eager to put it into effect.

In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.” [emphasis added] (source)

migrant army.jpg

Cloward and Piven would be proud. Apparently Norway is taking precautions as Sweden is on the verge of collapse due to the migrant crisis there, and indeed, Sweden has a lot to answer for – here we have Sir Peter Sutherland, a man who seeks to UNDERMINE the homogeneity of European nations – with mass migration, which he is in favour of. He works for the UN, and used to work for Goldman Sachs… (Remember when I wrote about ‘restocking the farm’? Link – the banks want this migration).


What Sir Peter and his cohorts really want is a truly homogenous Europe, where a white face is rarely seen. Where everyone is equally poor, and where islam becomes a dominant and massively destructive force. If they don’t want this, why enable and foment it?

So I have a message for our dear European leaders, including Mr Cameron:

We will vote OUT of Europe!

God Bless us all


Bloomberg says – “Bring on the Cashless Future”

I’ve talked about the mark of the beast before – a cashless society would be indeed that. (Link) Of course many are pushing for it – and it’s a perfect form of totalitarian control – disagree with government, and get your account frozen, and you can swiftly find yourself in difficulty, unable to buy food, medicine or pay bills.

Well Bloomberg has jumped on that bandwagon with this article: (Link)


My only comment is this:

Are these the very same people who have never put their hand in their pocket to give money to a homeless person?

At a guess they must be, how else could they fail to realise the power of cash to alleviate the suffering and hunger of those disenfranchised by society.

A cashless society must be resisted.

God Bless you


The 6% – putting it into perspective

This is going to bother you. It’s really, really going to bother you. You see, we think of psychopathy, and the 6% of the population who are that way, as being OVER THERE, not next door, not over the road, or down the street. We have swallowed the Hollywood lie that psychopaths are obvious, recognisable and always criminally evil. We never think of them as being someone we might meet. We have to get past this notion if we hope to protect ourselves.

If you’re a man or woman in your thirties who has dated, you’ve probably dated one. You may have worked for one. You may have divorced one. You may have employed one, been gazumped by one. You WILL have met one.

So let me give you some statistics, and I encourage you to do the very same thing for yourself and your local area, and post the figures in the comments section below.

My local council says we have 57,900 residents in our district. That figure gives us a total of 3,582 psychopaths. IN MY DISTRICT.

When you look then at the 18% who are psychopathically ‘compliant’ – those who take on psychopathic behaviours with a little encouragement – that’s a further 10,746 on top. The number of these who are currently displaying psychopathic or narcissitically selfish behviours right now is unknown.

So in the event the SHTF, in this district there will be 45,372 normal, relatively empathic individuals up against 14,328 psychopathic or potentially psychopathic behaving individuals.


You know they often say it only takes 3% of us to change the world? The 6% have done it already – us decent folks are going to have to make OUR 3% COUNT!

God Bless you


Veterans for Peace have dumped their medals outside Downing Street

These brave men and women who have served in the military have come to the conclusion that war is not the answer, and have dumped their medals in Downing Street as a protest against the Syrian airstrikes:

throwing down medals.jpg

You can read the whole article and watch their video here: Link

I say, thank you for your service, and thank you for your decision now to stand against war. All wars are banker wars – we know that now. Let us never forget those who have died in battle, those others who have come home wounded, and others still who have been left homeless on their return from military duty, by the state who cares not for them once they have served their purpose to the Rothschild banking corporation.

We must say NO to war.

God Bless you