The rules of the game

Let me begin by saying that I believe that we are being set up for WWIII – the supposed threat being Russia. Of course covertly the true war, the real WWIII will be an inter-racial and inter-religious war. We know this from Albert Pikes letter which I’ve written about before.

At the moment Russia is the bogeyman du jour. All the Rothschild owned puppets are parroting this dangerous propaganda – dangerous to the health and lives of your children. It’s not the elite’s children who will fight, it will be yours. Ghastly isn’t it, to realise you’re a pawn in a game – a mind game? This really is a war for your mind – because if they can persuade you the enemy is Russia, you will be happy for your children to fight. To fight to make bankers richer. To fight to put the survivors in debt for generations to come. No, we must resist. And in order to resist we must understand the rules of the game. The game that satan is playing with his pawns against all of humanity – all of us, made in the image of God. Satan hates that – he wants nothing but our destruction.

Bankers provide the key here – you see Rothschild owned central banks are the ones who control the world – who produce money at debt in every country they infest. This is the list of countries they currently have control over:

Complete List of BANKS Owned or Controlled by the Rothschild Family (As of 2013)

Source: Humans Are Free

Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
Albania: Bank of Albania
Algeria: Bank of Algeria
Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
Austria: Austrian National Bank
Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas
Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain
Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank
Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados
Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
Belize: Central Bank of Belize
Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority
Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia
Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana: Bank of Botswana
Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil
Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank
Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi
Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia
Came Roon: Bank of Central African States
Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada
Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
Chad: Bank of Central African States
Chile: Central Bank of Chile
China: The People’s Bank of China
Colombia: Bank of the Republic
Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros
Congo: Bank of Central African States
Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica
Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Croatia: Croatian National Bank
Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba
Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus
Czech Republic: Czech National Bank
Denmark: National Bank of Denmark
Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic
East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador
Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt
El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States
Estonia: Bank of Estonia
Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia
European Union: European Central Bank
Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji
Finland: Bank of Finland
France: Bank of France
Gabon: Bank of Central African States
The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia
Georgia: National Bank of Georgia
Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank
Ghana: Bank of Ghana
Greece: Bank of Greece
Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala
Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Guyana: Bank of Guyana
Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti
Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank
Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland
India: Reserve Bank of India
Indonesia: Bank Indonesia
Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq
Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland
Israel: Bank of Israel
Italy: Bank of Italy
Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica
Japan: Bank of Japan
Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan
Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan
Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya
Korea: Bank of Korea
Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia: Bank of Latvia
Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon
Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho
Libya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest)
Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay
Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania
Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg
Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao
Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia
Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar
Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi
Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia
Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Malta: Central Bank of Malta
Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius
Mexico: Bank of Mexico
Moldova: National Bank of Moldova
Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia
Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro
Morocco: Bank of Morocco
Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique
Namibia: Bank of Namibia
Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal
Netherlands: Netherlands Bank
Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua
Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria
Norway: Central Bank of Norway
Oman: Central Bank of Oman
Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan
Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea
Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay
Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru
Philip Pines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Poland: National Bank of Poland
Portugal: Bank of Portugal
Qatar: Qatar Central Bank
Romania: National Bank of Romania
Russia: Central Bank of Russia
Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda
San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino
Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa
Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Serbia: National Bank of Serbia
Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles
Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone
Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia
Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands
South Africa: South African Reserve Bank
Spain: Bank of Spain
Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka
Sudan: Bank of Sudan
Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname
Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland
Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank
Switzerland: Swiss National Bank
Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan
Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania
Thailand: Bank of Thailand
Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia
Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
Uganda: Bank of Uganda
Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine
United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom: Bank of England
United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu
Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela
Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam
Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen
Zambia: Bank of Zambia
Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe

You’ll see that Russia is on there. Here is a list of the ever-diminishing numbers of free and independent countries left in the world:

In the year of 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned or controlled Central Bank:

Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

The only countries left in 2003 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family were:

Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are:

Cuba
North Korea
Iran

(Link)

So, why do I mention Russia? Why is Russia getting so much flak? Why does it seem that they are being set up?

When a country as large and resource-rich as Russia goes “rogue” – i.e. stops playing the game by the rules that the Rothschilds, pawns of satan, have set up, they are likely to suffer for it. The Rothschilds will not want to see their influence lost through the nationalisation of the bank they currently own and control in Russia.

I quote: [emphasis added]

President Putin has been under heavy pressure from outside and inside: Western sanctions and intended oil price crash. Despite efforts by the Rothschild-controlled Central Bank of Russia (hereafter referred to as CBR) and the use of dozens of billions of foreign exchange reserves –   the value of the ruble against the dollar has, therefore, declined by 39% during the past few years.

There has been much speculation that President Putin may soon nationalize the CBR and the ruble according to his senior advisor and chairman of the Russian parliament’s economic policy committee Yevgeny Fyodorov  in order to raise money for Russia’s now necessary armament projects in what appears as an imposed war on Russia by Washington and NATO.

Under the Constitution, the CBR belongs to a foreign State – the City of London – and is taking orders from London and Washington’s controlled IMF. CBR can only print money corresponding to its cash in foreign currency, that being the dollar, which is not sufficient for Russia’s purposes. The CBR even has to buy the worthless US treasury bonds for the dollars paid for Russian oil – whereby the dollars are returned to the Federal Reserve Bank. This is one of the biggest heists of all time!

Moreover, President Putin is under pressure from the West, which wants to overthrow and replace him with Western-minded puppet oligarchs. Thus, the US ambassador to Moscow, John F.Tefft, is said to have made it very clear in this statement: “We will displace Putin from office and install our own people as leaders of the Russian government.”

(Link)

So much for “Russian interference” in the US elections! Putin is at risk of regime change coming from the deep state bullies hiding behind government in the United States. You see Russia, under Putin, is a powerful place – it has recovered well from economic annihilation! So now they must raise that bogeyman again in order to continue the control that satan has over our countries and the lives of our youth. Russia must be brought to heel, apparently, or suffer the consequences.

So we are told today in the Mail on Sunday that:

propaganda 2.jpg

Apparently Putin is responsible for UN policy? This is UN policy – to flood Europe with African migrants.

That video is from the UN’s own channel on YouTube. In case you can’t view it, the first frame says “The United Nations is working to forge a new global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration”.

We are told that:

propaganda russia.jpg

Spicy memes with so much truth in them – apparently the fault of evil disruptive Russian “bots”. Hmmm.

All the while we are presented with fake news by so-called news broadcasters:

fake news gif.gif

See the guys walking normally in the background? Shame on the reporter for trying to fake a high wind!

In fact our media broadcasts a lot of hot air – lies and half lies, and the truth is presented with so much care to make it seem implausible if it doesn’t support the current narrative.

The rules of the game are not God’s rules. They are not fair and honest measures, they are weighted with a thumb on the scales when a lie is needed to push an evil narrative. The government is not just complicit but willing to go along because they work for the elites and not the people of this nation.

I cannot sit here and say I trust Putin – I don’t know him. But I and many in Britain think him a more honest leader than our own – one who is on the right side. Theresa May is not for the people of this country, and we know it. She has had two years to bring us out of the EU and we are no closer to agreement. It’s not a failing on her part, it’s by design. She is doing exactly what her paymasters require. She is obeying the rules of the game.

So finally I will share this meme again, Fascist that I (apparently) am (this was a Fascist mantra):

DOV0laXW0AE0S-K.jpg large

Let’s love our fellow whites, and stand with them against what is planned for us – religious and inter-racial war.

God Bless you

Lis

Advertisements

Clicking ‘Like’

I wish there was a button that just said ‘Thank You’ – as in ‘Thank you for telling me this awful thing you just shared.’ Like? No, I hate most of what I’m reading these days, and I’m frequently, frankly SPEECHLESS, but by goodness I am grateful for the bloggers who put time in to check and share the stories and opinions they do.

Keep on keeping on, everyone!

God Bless you

Lis

More censorship from the Daily Mail

Media censorship like that found in the previous post in the so called ‘Swedish’ Somalians is rife it would seem. I have been commenting on the Daily Mail for a couple of weeks, and I’ve had quite a few of my comments simply not appear.

I can reveal to you today that your comment will automatically not appear if you mention the name Rothschild, and in addition, I have now tried three times to post on articles related to South Africa, that it is heading towards a genocide of the minority white population. So far none have appeared.

This post is the latest – I thought I would copy this so it appears in full somewhere, even if only here. I’ll be sure to let you know if it appears later today. But I doubt it will…

censorship.jpg

Do you know of any news sites where you’ve commented and your comments have been censored? Please leave a comment here if so – it would be good to make that censorship public for all to see!

God Bless you

Lis

Is Donald Trump’s life in danger? The elites come out and say ‘He must be stopped.’

Mike King of tomatobubble.com knows his history, so it should come as no surprise to see him break this story (Link), and I quote:

“Published by the Hearst Corporation, Esquire Magazine, though not primarily a political magazine, is clearly aligned with the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class).[…]

What your intrepid reporter and his trusted feline sidekick did, however, find surprising – shocking to be more precise – is what appears to be a cryptic death threat suggested by an Esquire online story posted on February 24, 2016. The headline reads: ‘How to Stop Donald Trump’, and is written by Charles Pierce. It’s a very intriguing headline, but, in and of itself, nothing much to cause alarm.

But just two paragraphs into his hate-filled piece, we find an extended reference to Louisiana Senator Huey Long, the anti-Establishment insurgent who was planning to challenge incumbent President FDR in the 1936 election. From the Esquire article:

“In his magisterial biography of Huey Long… T. Harry Williams explains the thinking behind the long game that the ‘Kingfish’ saw himself playing as the Great Depression played out.

There was no doubt in Long’s mind that that all would go as he had planned it. Of Roosevelt he said scornfully, ‘I can take him. He’s a phony…He’s scared of me. I can outpromise him, and he knows it. People will believe me and they won’t believe him.’

The energy behind the two men is as similar as the parallel is inexact. 

Huey Long … relentlessly vilified the economic and social elite, first in Louisiana and then in the entire country. He, Trump, on the other hand, was a child of that elite, and he had never departed from it, except in his public persona, which is where we find him now. A huge portion of the Republican electorate—and, sadly, a not-insignificant portion of the American people—wants a strongman, the more vulgar the better. Huey Long came by his vulgarity naturally. He, Trump has had to work at it …. I am one of you, they both said, you poorly educated suckers. Look how common and vulgar I am.

There does not appear to be any way to stop him now. Unless something completely untoward happens, He, Trump will be the Republican nominee for president.” […]

The chilling part of Pierce’s hate-fest is not what he wrote about history pertaining to Huey Long, but rather, what he did not write. What Pierce deliberately withheld from his readers, but is certainly already well-known to the PRC, is that Long’s Trump-like rebellion was finally “stopped” by a bullet to his abdomen, followed by some dirty work at the hospital. On September 8, 1935, a Dr. Carl Weiss, we are told, confronted Long and shot him. Rather than take Weiss alive, bodyguards shoot him 60 times. (Dead men tell no tales!)

As the “conspiracy theory” goes, Weiss was just a patsy, set up only to punch Long in the face while a bodyguard actually shot the Senator. Long was rushed to the hospital and died two days later due to what some say is “medical incompetence”. No autopsy was performed (just like none was performed on Justice Antonin Scalia). More than 100,000 mourners attended the funeral of the anti-Wall Street “rock star” who would have been President.””

Esquire magazine is not alone, today we have reports that The Economist has joined in, saying ‘Trump must be stopped.’ You can read the article here: Link, and I quote:

“The things Mr Trump has said in this campaign make him unworthy of leading one of the world’s great political parties, let alone America. One way to judge politicians is by whether they appeal to our better natures: Mr Trump has prospered by inciting hatred and violence. He is so unpredictable that the thought of him anywhere near high office is terrifying. He must be stopped.”

The Economist is a Rothschild owned publication.

I can’t make up my mind is this is all just theatre to keep the likes of me and others distracted and looking for clues (distracting us from what?) or whether Trump is genuinely a threat to the cabal.

My view on Trump is that it makes no difference who is elected president of the United States if the American pople do not turn away from sin! If you don’t turn away from sin, you’ll get the president you deserve. I say that with no delight, but with sadness, knowing that we in the UK are similarly under judgement.

What are your thoughts?

God Bless you

Lis

How to bring down Europe in a few easy steps

First of all, bomb the heck out of the Middle East, and send all those fleeing into camps run by the UN and it’s NGO affiliates.

Then stop paying them in the camps so they’ll flee.

Then give them boats (how else did they get them?) and suggest they might like to go to Germany, Sweden and so on! Make sure they have life-jackets (yes, someone is supplying them with free life-jackets.) Basically: support a Muslim invasion of Europe.

lifejackets.jpg

Don’t forget to enlist the media to preach that these are ‘refugees’ fleeing a ‘warzone’ (rather than nice safe camps). Make sure when there are losses of life from these dangerous journeys to milk them for all they are worth, rather than facing the fact that these are Muslim invading armies who wish to destroy Europe.

Give them money and entitlements.

This is classic Cloward Piven Strategy. I’ve written about it before here: Link, but I’ll add a quote from there fore you:

“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Inspired by the August 1965 riots in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles (which erupted after police had used batons to subdue a black man suspected of drunk driving), Cloward and Piven published an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. Following its publication, The Nation sold an unprecedented 30,000 reprints. Activists were abuzz over the so-called “crisis strategy” or “Cloward-Piven Strategy,” as it came to be called. Many were eager to put it into effect.

In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.” [emphasis added] (source)

migrant army.jpg

Cloward and Piven would be proud. Apparently Norway is taking precautions as Sweden is on the verge of collapse due to the migrant crisis there, and indeed, Sweden has a lot to answer for – here we have Sir Peter Sutherland, a man who seeks to UNDERMINE the homogeneity of European nations – with mass migration, which he is in favour of. He works for the UN, and used to work for Goldman Sachs… (Remember when I wrote about ‘restocking the farm’? Link – the banks want this migration).

homogeneity.png

What Sir Peter and his cohorts really want is a truly homogenous Europe, where a white face is rarely seen. Where everyone is equally poor, and where islam becomes a dominant and massively destructive force. If they don’t want this, why enable and foment it?

So I have a message for our dear European leaders, including Mr Cameron:

We will vote OUT of Europe!

God Bless us all

Lis

Bloomberg says – “Bring on the Cashless Future”

I’ve talked about the mark of the beast before – a cashless society would be indeed that. (Link) Of course many are pushing for it – and it’s a perfect form of totalitarian control – disagree with government, and get your account frozen, and you can swiftly find yourself in difficulty, unable to buy food, medicine or pay bills.

Well Bloomberg has jumped on that bandwagon with this article: (Link)

bloomberg.jpg

My only comment is this:

Are these the very same people who have never put their hand in their pocket to give money to a homeless person?

At a guess they must be, how else could they fail to realise the power of cash to alleviate the suffering and hunger of those disenfranchised by society.

A cashless society must be resisted.

God Bless you

Lis

The 6% – putting it into perspective

This is going to bother you. It’s really, really going to bother you. You see, we think of psychopathy, and the 6% of the population who are that way, as being OVER THERE, not next door, not over the road, or down the street. We have swallowed the Hollywood lie that psychopaths are obvious, recognisable and always criminally evil. We never think of them as being someone we might meet. We have to get past this notion if we hope to protect ourselves.

If you’re a man or woman in your thirties who has dated, you’ve probably dated one. You may have worked for one. You may have divorced one. You may have employed one, been gazumped by one. You WILL have met one.

So let me give you some statistics, and I encourage you to do the very same thing for yourself and your local area, and post the figures in the comments section below.

My local council says we have 57,900 residents in our district. That figure gives us a total of 3,582 psychopaths. IN MY DISTRICT.

When you look then at the 18% who are psychopathically ‘compliant’ – those who take on psychopathic behaviours with a little encouragement – that’s a further 10,746 on top. The number of these who are currently displaying psychopathic or narcissitically selfish behviours right now is unknown.

So in the event the SHTF, in this district there will be 45,372 normal, relatively empathic individuals up against 14,328 psychopathic or potentially psychopathic behaving individuals.

Gulp.

You know they often say it only takes 3% of us to change the world? The 6% have done it already – us decent folks are going to have to make OUR 3% COUNT!

God Bless you

Lis