The Advertising Standards Authority are now social engineers

Yes, the ASA, who are responsible for making sure that advertising is not misleading, are now branching out into social engineering (for which they are not qualified!). This article from the Daily Mail states: (Link)

Traditional portrayals of housewives are to be banned from advertisements in a crackdown on sexist stereotypes by watchdogs.

Depictions of women being solely responsible for cooking, cleaning and childcare in commercials will disappear.

But at the same time, it will become wrong to suggest only men are capable of doing DIY or are useless when it comes to chores and caring for babies.

The changes come from the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which argues that these stereotypes are limiting the aspirations of both women and men.

So it’s sexist for a woman to be in the kitchen cooking (we mustn’t offend the feminazis, must we?), yet what is clear to those of us who can think is that the removal of this ‘stereotype’ is JUST as much a limitation of girls aspirations! In fact of course, it’s a satanic subversion of everything which God says is right, pure and proper.

In case any of your are in doubt on my views on this (as a woman) – God’s blueprint for me is clear – I was created to be a helpmeet to a man. That was what He created Eve for, and that’s what He created me for too. He did not make me to be a CEO, but I could still be a CEO, if I could do that without compromising the role He created me for. To care for and nurture a husband and family is what God created women for.

The ASA wants to play its part in finally doing away with that. When organisations, whose main purpose is to make sure that misleading claims are not made for a product or service, start interfering with the structure of advertisements for a, frankly, satanic agenda, they’ve gone too far!

The public are entitled to see ‘traditional’ depictions of women and men, just as we are forced to tolerate seeing transgender women in advertisements for mother’s day! (Makes me glad I don’t watch television anymore!)

It is simply wrong to allow one, and yet deny the other. It is clear that satan’s agenda rolls on…

advert comment 1

God Bless you


The Daily Mail censors South Africa comments AGAIN!

I have to keep posting these – there has to be a record somewhere of what is being censored in the MSM – how important to keep showing that, try as we might to raise this issue, we have not been ALLOWED to tell the truth about South Africa.

The other day there was an  an article about a woman who had posted this image on her Twitter to a storm of condemnation:

muslim majority.jpg

When whites are a minority, we know what it’ll be like: South Africa, so I commented:

comments they won't allow sa crop.jpg

Needless to say this was too close to the truth for the Daily Mail to allow out there, and the comment did not appear.

Then yesterday they had an article about South Africa – someone had been out to SA taking drone photographs of the disparity of the dwellings of the rich and the poor. I commented as a reply to another commenter (click for bigger)

sa comment crop.jpg

I also commented: (again click for bigger)sa comment 2 crop.jpg

Neither appeared. Interestingly the comments on that article were moderated – why would you need to moderate comments on an article about aerial photographs of SA? Take a look at what was allowed:

moderated comments on an article about SA crop.jpg

Just vague comments and questions – nothing of any substance. I am disgusted with the DM for this. If you want to see the article you can find it here: Link – and also note that the article appears in the TRAVEL section of the paper?! Wow – not even worth the political attention of readers. Disgraceful. I’ll share couple of troubling things now, both thanks to

sa farmers

stop white genocide

We MUST act to support South African whites NOW! Can you act as a sponsor for someone seeking to leave SA? Look into your immigration laws – if you are wealthy or have work, can you sponsor a white South Africa worker and their family to come to your country? If you can, then please consider this – get in touch with me via the About Lis page. I have contacts who would love to hear from you, I’m sure. We have to do everything we can both for those leaving, and for those staying – first and foremost – PRAY for South Africa, please!

Also please consider a donation to Karin Smith – she needs a secod surgery and she’s not over her first yet. The wonderful folks at (South Africa Faily Relief Project) made this wonderful little video as a tribute to Karin’s hard work and dedication. Keep them and her in your prayers please. This fight is for the life of our race – if they can get away with this in SA they can get away with it here (and they plan to).

Please share the video far and wide – it’s good for both Karin and for the whole movement in general.

God Bless you


Brexit day – wish us all luck!

Today I have been praying that any intended vote rigging by our incumbent government would be supernaturally foiled – that votes would end up in the correct piles and that the vote would be utterly fair. I hope you’ll stand with me in that prayer – this is a vital day for the UK!

This is an image I grabbed from a show that was done by the UKColumn:


And for a little humour, here are two theme songs for the day!

And of course:

I spoke to friends last night who said they had basically never been so keen to get a cross on a ballot paper. Let’s all pray for a fair vote today – that is my one concern after Scotland.

God Bless you



Milking the story of Jo Cox – and the curious case of the comments they won’t allow

So Jo Cox was an MP who was killed by a man when she intervened in an argument he was having with someone else. However, as you can see, he was clearly a ‘right-winger’ and this story is now being milked for all it’s worth…

milking it.jpg

So the death of this woman (or ‘death’ – you’ll see why I say that in a moment) is now a pro-remain tool to discredit any opposition to the velvet glove of European power.

false flag2.jpg

If you disagree with her you have now allied yourself with a man who admitted he had mental health problems. If you disagree with her you are a narrow minded right-wing bigot. If you are for ‘Britain first’ you will be tarred with the same brush as those in the US who want to make America great again. Yes, basically nationalism must be crushed by making it so vile, so unacceptable, that society will shun you.


Jo Cox’s husband is hereby elevated from the position of being merely a human being with an opinion to being ‘right’ (or rather ‘correct’: we can’t say right anymore, because that’s tantamount to Nazism 😉 ). Of course Nigel Farage, and his poster, is clearly responsible for an argument which happened between a random man and someone else which Jo Cox intervened in and which got her killed. Or did it? Because I see no tears. None.

cox parents.jpg
Jo Cox’s Mum and Dad

false flag.jpg

Dry eyed. Now of course they could be hopped up on tranquillisers from the Doc, for all I know, but they don’t look anywhere near as grief stricken as I would expect – in fact they look like so many other people you see after a false flag.

I’m not saying that this is a false flag – but it’s being used as effectively as if it were. Thus either way, it is being used to skew the vote coming up this Thursday, and indeed I get the impression that this is rather timely as they were planning to rig the vote anyway. I mean how embarrassing if all the polls said one thing and then the vote came out differently. That would be awfully like the rigged vote of the general election of 1992, when all the polls said Labour would win, and then somehow they didn’t. How interesting….


So I made a few comments to that effect – that as they were perhaps planning to rig the vote anyway, that it is rather useful to make political capital out of a tragedy. Needless to say, they didn’t get published because, you know, censorship 😉

comment censorship 3


comment censorship 2


comment censorship 1

Don’t mention the TTIP!

So here we have a ‘tragedy’ turned into political capital by the same corrupt Oligarchs which drove us into the EU all those years ago. We weren’t told the truth then, and we aren’t being told (much of) the truth now.

We must vote out.

God Bless you


Don’t believe the hype – the tragedy of Jo Cox’s death must not overshadow the truth

This video is everything I would like to say about the death of Jo Cox MP – tragic though it is, the media are making political capital out of it in the most shameful way – even to the point where I doubt the narrative at all. It has echoes of so many previous events which were used to manipulate the public. Watch please!

God Bless you


Another in an occasional series called: ‘We’ve been lied to’


Some of the brightest minds on earth are found in the white race. Interestingly (and you’ll see why in a moment) we’re not as far ahead in those stakes as the Orientals. This poses a question, because as China enforced a strict one-child policy, which it has now abandoned, China has not, apparently, been invaded by Islam, nor has Africa’s poorest flooded to its doors. This is probably in no small part due to the structure of the country politically. Who would choose China over welfare-generous Europe?

So Europe is the destination of choice for Africans and Muslims, and we’re being told we must have this because our birth rate is so low.

It’s so low because we believed a lie called ‘over-population’, and we believed – ah, that’s it – the true difference between Europe’s low birth rate and China’s – we have feminism.

We’re idiots.

I say that as a woman, too!

Feminism says it’s the indecisive sex’s right to choose! Feminism teaches us that women are better at most things than men (because we can multitask). Feminism has caused entry exams for physically demanding roles like Firefighter to be lowered so that women can get in. Do we not think this was stupid? Good grief, did we think that we could just take control? We were GIVEN control, and we were given it for a reason. Does that have  something to do with this, I wonder? Numbers chapter 30:

1 And Moses spake unto the heads of the tribes concerning the children of Israel, saying, This is the thing which the Lord hath commanded.

2 If a man vow a vow unto the Lord, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.

3 If a woman also vow a vow unto the Lord, and bind herself by a bond, being in her father’s house in her youth;

4 And her father hear her vow, and her bond wherewith she hath bound her soul, and her father shall hold his peace at her; then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she hath bound her soul shall stand.

5 But if her father disallow her in the day that he heareth; not any of her vows, or of her bonds wherewith she hath bound her soul, shall stand: and the Lord shall forgive her, because her father disallowed her.

6 And if she had at all an husband, when she vowed, or uttered ought out of her lips, wherewith she bound her soul;

7 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at her in the day that he heard it: then her vows shall stand, and her bonds wherewith she bound her soul shall stand.

8 But if her husband disallowed her on the day that he heard it; then he shall make her vow which she vowed, and that which she uttered with her lips, wherewith she bound her soul, of none effect: and the Lord shall forgive her.

9 But every vow of a widow, and of her that is divorced, wherewith they have bound their souls, shall stand against her.

10 And if she vowed in her husband’s house, or bound her soul by a bond with an oath;

11 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at her, and disallowed her not: then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she bound her soul shall stand.

12 But if her husband hath utterly made them void on the day he heard them; then whatsoever proceeded out of her lips concerning her vows, or concerning the bond of her soul, shall not stand: her husband hath made them void; and the Lord shall forgive her.

13 Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may establish it, or her husband may make it void.

14 But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day; then he establisheth all her vows, or all her bonds, which are upon her: he confirmeth them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them.

15 But if he shall any ways make them void after that he hath heard them; then he shall bear her iniquity.

16 These are the statutes, which the Lord commanded Moses, between a man and his wife, between the father and his daughter, being yet in her youth in her father’s house.

Read it and weep!

God is a God of commandments and statutes, and I’m pretty sure (in fact I know ) that satan knows the very same rules, himself. Only we are ignorant. So white women of the west have been sold a lie – feminism – which really equates to male oppression – we have men just where we think they always had us. It began there, and has now spread widely to the minorities who are allowed to oppress you.

Am I against women’s liberation? Which western woman wasn’t really pretty free BEFORE this lie came along? Women had had access to birth control before feminism. They had had access to land and property rights and the vote long before feminism. Were those things a mistake? Until they were used by women solely, no. When I say that, what I mean is that a husband or a father had a degree of influence over that woman. Once feminism kicked in in the 1960’s, women stopped thinking they were in need of any guidance. They took their points of reference from magazines and the TV, not fuddy-duddy old Dad who said that wearing short skirts and showing everything off was wrong.

This means that today no man has any power in the eyes of a woman to stop her doing the most foolish things. Yet you see from the bible chapter that she will be held liable for her vows should a man (father or husband) not reject them on hearing them. Seriously – this is not a small thing! God knew that a woman’s judgement is not the same as a man’s. A woman needs a man to be head over her – and what is true then is as true today.

And you will note it is ONLY the white race this message of feminism was preached to, and it is the white race that is making itself extinct due to a women’s right to choose (late term abortion is now being mooted in the UK, by of all people, the head of the Midwives Association!). A woman’s right to choose, and a woman’s right to be equal (i.e. superior and have the rules changed for her, so she can get in) has destroyed femininity, and has destroyed the family. No wonder our race is in real trouble! And it is!

But just try showing this article, by a woman, I state again, to a young woman of today and she’ll think it’s stupid. Yet here I am in my 40’s childless, and alone. All because of the cultural shift that I allowed myself to be drawn along by due to lack of any firmer ground. The firmer ground is a firm family structure based in the word of God. Without that we are all like leaves blowing in the breeze – and the winds of cultural doctrine are blowing harder than ever.

I’ll leave you with this amazing video from Stefan Molyneux – this is his best so far in my view, and pretty much sums up the lives of a lot of women in my age group who believed the lie – who were perhaps as this lady, the product of dysfunctional families, or perhaps just convinced by what they saw in the media that everything their parents tried to instill in them was just ‘square’ and are now broken. Broken as I was broken. Broken by mistakes made with men. It’s salutary, and this recording should be required listening for every unmarried woman.

The survival of our race depends on us changing our views, denying the media the chance to influence us in what we believe and in how we act. It’s a time, more than ever, for back-to-basics biblical theology as the foundation of everything we do each day.

God Bless you


Absolutely gobsmacking media manipulation by, you guessed it, the Daily Mail

This will make you fume. I won’t say another word until you see this… (source)

misleading graphics.jpg

JUST LOOK AT THAT! This is absolutely SHAMEFUL election steering from this so-called ‘NEWS’ PAPER.

Just in case you haven’t spotted it yet (and you will have, but will all the DMs readers have done so?), the graph deliberately begins at 34% to make the OUT vote look disproportionately small.


I will be voting out next month, and more than that, if the vote is rigged to stay in (which I suspect after the Scotland referendum vote rigging, it will be) I shall be looking to leave this country! It’s heading down the pan!

/rant 😉

God Bless you