Getting past the Daily Mail censors to reveal the truth about organ donation

I have found one of the Daily Mail’s censored words! I have! It’s the word “abomination”, isn’t that interesting?

After two attempts last night to share this short comment on this article, I succeeded this morning when I added dots into the word abomination:

Are you aware that organs come from living people, and are not taken after death as the ordinary person understands it? If so you will understand that people should never be used in this way. As for animals, this is an absolute abom.in.ation.

Why is this important? Because organ donation is an important topic on this blog, and as you’ll see from the following top three comments, most Daily Mail readers would rather humans be vivisected than animals:

dm comments 3.jpg

So taking a pig’s heart is terrible evil and exploitation, yeah? Here’s the comment I replied to, which is currently the seventh of the top ten:

dm comment

These people really do think it’s cruel to take an animals organ, but not to take a human one.They probably believe that the animal will be killed for the organ but that human organs are taken “after death”. This is part of the sick trick our satanic rulers have played on us.

The bit which the DM clearly didn’t like is that taking that organ (it wouldn’t matter which animal it came from, being a pig is just the most “obviously” bad) and putting it inside a human, made in the image of God is an ABOMINATION!

These fools revere animals above humans!

We are not to love our lives “to the death”

“and they did overcome him because of the blood of the Lamb, and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life — unto death;” Revelation 11:12 [YLT]

Taking an organ from another human to prolong another human life is to deny the humanity of the “donor” (not a donor because they have not given informed consent to be vivisected for their organs – vivisected means to be cut open alive, often without anaesthetic). It is theft: state sanctioned murder. To put an animal part into a human, a pig’s heart of all things, is to fly in the face of God and say that human life is worth more than God’s Will!

Doctors cannot deliver you out of the hand of God! God tells us who He is:

“See now that I am He; there is no God besides Me. I bring death and I give life; I wound and I heal, and there is no one who can deliver from My hand.” Deuteronomy 32:39 [KJV]

I’ll end with sharing Hannah’s prayer from the book of Samuel. First the context. In Chapter 1 we see Hannah pray for a child, and she promises this child to God. God grants her wish, and opens her womb. At the end of Chapter 1 we read: [emphasis added]

24 And when she had weaned him, she took him up with her, with three bullocks, and one ephah of flour, and a bottle of wine, and brought him unto the house of the Lord in Shiloh: and the child was young.

25 And they slew a bullock, and brought the child to Eli.

26 And she said, Oh my lord, as thy soul liveth, my lord, I am the woman that stood by thee here, praying unto the Lord.

27 For this child I prayed; and the Lord hath given me my petition which I asked of him:

28 Therefore also I have lent him to the Lord; as long as he liveth he shall be lent to the Lord. And he worshipped the Lord there. [KJV]

In chapter two we read her prayer: [emphasis added]

1 And Hannah prayed, and said, My heart rejoiceth in the Lord, mine horn is exalted in the Lord: my mouth is enlarged over mine enemies; because I rejoice in thy salvation.

2 There is none holy as the Lord: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.

3 Talk no more so exceeding proudly; let not arrogancy come out of your mouth: for the Lord is a God of knowledge, and by him actions are weighed.

4 The bows of the mighty men are broken, and they that stumbled are girded with strength.

5 They that were full have hired out themselves for bread; and they that were hungry ceased: so that the barren hath born seven; and she that hath many children is waxed feeble.

6 The Lord killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.

7 The Lord maketh poor, and maketh rich: he bringeth low, and lifteth up.

8 He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s, and he hath set the world upon them.

9 He will keep the feet of his saints, and the wicked shall be silent in darkness; for by strength shall no man prevail.

10 The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces; out of heaven shall he thunder upon them: the Lord shall judge the ends of the earth; and he shall give strength unto his king, and exalt the horn of his anointed.

I love her prayer because she acknowledges the might and power of God.

When we turn to medical science, and in this case it’s “abomination science”, we are denying the might and power of God! We are saying that without medical intervention this person will die, as if we should not turn to God first and see what He says!

Here are some previous relevant posts for you to read:

Organ donation scandal – the truth about organ donation – MUST READ MUST SHARE

The Truth About Organ Donation: 13 y.o. boy wakes up as doctors prepare to harvest his organs

Go to God, or ask the devil?

Medical word-magic

May the fear of God bring you into all wisdom.

Lis

Advertisements

Thor’s Hammer – now used in surgery?

Yes.

Now, let me begin by saying that we have ONE God! YHWH is His name, and He is worthy of ALL worship! His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ (Yeshua Messiah) came to show us the truth, to set the captives free and to show us how the Law of God is to be kept – this is His “light yoke” which keeps us on the straight and narrow. That light yoke is the Torah. Anything which belongs to any other faith, any other “god” is absolutely forbidden to us. We should not even utter their names (Exodus 23:13)! Our God is a jealous God! He is jealous over us and loves us and wants us to know Him and not give honour to the “pantheon” of paganism.

So that’s why I’m sharing this story, because instruments like Thor’s hammer – things which are made to honour this demon god – they are NOT for us! Yet as is so often the way, we are faced with the medical profession and their pharmakeia, their “witchcraft and sorcery”. This hammer, being used in orthopedic surgery (and for anyone who doubts that hammers are used in surgery, it’s for joint replacements where bones need to be broken, chiselled etc.) is going to be used on unconscious patients without their consent! I mean just WHY?!

Is it for the titillation of the surgeons? It can’t possibly be for efficacy, because if so, why the need to call it Thor’s hammer at all? Or is it just another example of how depraved the medical profession has become? After all, they all keep quiet about organ “donation” being murder, don’t they? And let’s not forget that birth control is abortion too – yes they kept that one quiet too (in fact they discussed it and THEN kept it quiet!).

So here it is – Thor’s hammer – being used in surgery in Australia. I quote below the picture:

thors hammer

Australian doctors are now using a miniature version of Thor’s hammer Mjolnir to perform surgery.

A hospital in Wagga Wagga, a city in the same state as Sydney, managed to get their hands on a three-pound hammer crafted in honor of the Mighty Thor that was built by a local biomedical engineering firm. The medical Mjolnir is made of medical-grade surgical steel, so it checks out.

For anyone wondering why a surgeon would need a hammer, they are often used to reshape bones and set implants. Surgical Mjolnir was first used last month to perform a knee replacement. The mythical weapon-turned medical tool was revealed on courses.com.au. […]

“The surgeons had requested we design and manufacture a medical grade hammer of increased weight as this increases the surgeons’ dexterity within the operation. We came to the idea of crafting our own surgical Mjolnirs as a way of demonstrating the unique ability to develop purpose-built surgical instrument.”

thors hammer 2

Link

Does this impact (if you’ll pardon the pun) patient’s health? The fact that this tool is associated with a demon god? I don’t know – I would always suggest that, just as you would bless your food before eating it, that you pray off yourself any demonic effects from any medical procedure that you have had to undergo. I would also remind you to go to God first before undergoing any kind of medical treatment. I am under treatment right now, and He is making it so effective! I am so aware that all the doors necessary are open, I am heard, I am listened to, and that He is in control. Read more: Go to God, or ask the devil?

What do you think of this? I’d love to hear your comments!

God Bless you

Lis

Organ donation versus abortion

What do organ donation and abortion have in common? More than you’d like to think.

First of all, they both end in the actual death of a living person, who was once knitted together in their mother’s womb (Psalm 139:13)

Secondly they are both performed without anaesthetic – of course ‘foetuses’ and people who are ‘brain dead’ don’t feel pain… or do they? Link Link

Thirdly they are very valuable to those removing their organs and killing them. “Today the transplant industry is a $20 billion per year business.” Link (quote is from page 2). Aborted foetuses are also apparently worth money to Planned Parenthood Link

No organ donation, or abortion were consented to by the victim, whether ‘informed’ consent in the case of organ donation, or by the so-called ‘foetus’ or baby.

They are both pushed for by society and doctors. In fact even the church is getting in on the act, calling for Christians to be organ donors, and that these are ‘sacrificial offerings’ – in total ignorance I’m sure, but human sacrifice is pretty much what organ donation amounts to. Link

Please help spread the word. Say NO to organ donation.

God Bless you

Lis

Organ Donation is proof you can scam an honest person

The other day I had a call from an Indian sounding lady who told me she was calling me on behalf of Tesco’s and Morrison’s supermarkets to tell me I’d won a £60 shopping voucher. Knowing that I had not entered any competition to receive this, my instincts told me this was a scam, and I told the woman so and hung up.

They say you can’t scam an honest person, but if I had been brought up to believe that beneficent corporations would ring me out of the blue to give me money, I might have been fooled. And so it is with organ donation. We have been lied to so completely, so comprehensively, for so long that the public actually believes absolute lies on the subject. Their ignorance is fostered deliberately in order to continue the scam – a criminal act against the people of this country! In fact of course, without our ignorance it could never take place at all.

person.jpg

This lady claims she has been told her baby will die when it is born, and so has decided to carry it to term to “donate its organs”. There is something very wrong with the whole story – I actually suspect it is a false or planted story (I hope so, because otherwise this woman has been deceived into allowing her child to be killed – vivisected – for its organs).

The story begins with an error:

A brave mother who’s unborn child has died in the womb will carry her baby to full term in order to donate their organs to another dying child.

Hayley Martin, 30, from Hull, East Yorkshire found out at her 20-week scan that her child will die during labour or within minutes of birth.

Ummm – which is it? Is it dead, or will it die at birth? Is this just sloppy journalism? I don’t know. Then more strangeness:

While doctors suggested she get a termination to avoid the trauma of birth, she has decided to take the pregnancy to term so their baby daughter’s organs can go to other newborns in desperate need of transplants. 

At 20 weeks it would be classed as a late-term abortion and would be “partial birth” – I don’t see how that is less traumatic! (Read: Abortion – the story that brought a class of teens to silence)

The article then says she will be induced “Christmas week” a month early (why on earth would you do that?!)

Then it gets very sad because this woman really does not know the truth about organ donation:

‘I also know there will be babies out there who could have a chance at life with Ava’s healthy organs. Why should two babies die if one can be saved?’

However, the stoic mother-of-three still gets upset when she thinks about losing her tot.

‘I try to be as honest as possible and have a rehearsed speech prepared, but at times I can’t help but to fall apart and cry – especially when strangers congratulate me in the supermarket or at the shops’ she said. 

The baby has to weigh a minimum of 5.5lbs to become an organ donor and the couple are still unsure about what their daughter will be able to donate, but think her heart valves, liver cells and pancreas are the likely candidates. 

Later in the article they promote the idea of starting a charity in their unborn daughter’s name:

The Martins are also planning on starting a charity project in Ava-Joy’s memory to help other families who decide to carry to term, despite a fatal diagnosis.

They want to raise awareness of fatal fetal conditions, and support families by creating ‘memory packs’ to help them capture every precious moment.

You can read the full story here: Link

Something doesn’t feel right about this article. The images of the sad-faced Mum are there – all too posed and perfect. I cannot imagine any mother wanting to share such a personal and painful decision before the day. It smacks of propaganda for the organ donation drive. I’ve written before about this here: Link

Either this is an absolutely tragic story, made worse by medical deception, or it’s a planted story to test, or garner the level of support there is to bring in a system which expects mothers to consider carrying children to term for their organs. Which, by the way is sick!

I’ll quote from my previous article linked above:

The fact is the debate has been opened – that is what the article was designed to do – to open the debate and get you thinking that this was a viable option, and to guage the public’s feelings on the issue.

This proposal will move forward unless we say a resounding no again and again. They have begun this with a debate in a national newspaper, next time the debate might be in parliament – will you even pay attention to the news to know about it? Will your MP do what you want, as your representative, if you do?

The public are being softened up for this to become policy at some point – when they’ve suggested it enough times, and you’ve stopped saying no.

Say NO to organ donation.

God Bless you

Lis

England takes a further step towards tyranny

Oh yes, you thought you lived in a free country? You thought you were born free? No, because the government is planning to introduce an opt-out organ donation system after all. No, I did not get a response from my MP – I reminded him about my letter, and got a stock response extolling the virtues of organ donation opt-out systems. I never had him down as a moron – I doubt he is, he is what my father would have called a knave. He is a social engineer who thinks that his opinions are of interest to his constituents, when in actual fact it’s supposed to be the other way around (because, Sonny Jim, you work for me). But I digress, I haven’t decided whether to pursue the matter through his office – there will be a consultation and I hope to get involved in some small way – the idea that the state thinks it owns your organs unless you claim them by opting out is abhorrent at the very least, unethical as standard (the modern way) and deceptive by design. Can’t get informed consent? No need – just presume consent.

I need to pray fervently about what action to take on this – I have said a lot, and I have a future, and a life to live. I have written much about this on an internet where free speech is not really safe any longer. Privacy is under threat, and to continue to speak up and speak out is a risk. I will continue if the LORD calls me to – because to disobey Him would be worse than any human harm that could come my way. But I also acknowledge that standing up now may be the thing He no longer wants me to do, and in which case, again to continue to speak would be to be disobedient. As a woman I have to acknowledge my place, and my role, and I’m not Boudicca!

So I’m going to share with you the highs and lows of this new system as unveiled by the evil Theresa May. Can you tell how I feel about this? The pain, the physical pain I felt last night when I came home to see the news – no words for it. No words. My heart was heavy, and my soul was deeply troubled.

So, quoting from this article: [My added comments in bold]

In her speech at the Conservative conference in Manchester, Mrs May said: ‘Our ability to help people who need transplants is limited by the number of organ donors. That is why last year 500 people died because a suitable organ was not available. So to address this challenge … we will change that system, shifting the balance of presumption in favour of organ donation, working on behalf of the most vulnerable.’ [No, Ms May, the most vulnerable are those who are deceived to think their organs are removed after they are cold, blue and dead.]

The devolved Welsh government changed the rules in December 2015 so doctors can assume all over-18s consent to be donors after their death [lies!] unless they have opted out. Relatives still have the right to object to a loved one’s organs being removed, but if they can’t be contacted a transplant will go ahead. [Those in my generation without children will not be protected – who will speak up to stop this for us, if we have not opted out? This makes those without family especially vulnerable, but who cares about them, Ms May?]

While doctors are happy, there are others sounding the alarm: The article continues:

Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chairman of the BMA council, said the plan for an opt-out system was ‘excellent news’ and that it ‘has the potential to save many lives’. [And murder many innocents, Dr Nagpaul]

But Peter Saunders, from the Christian Medical Fellowship, said: ‘Presumed consent is illiberal, unethical, unproven and unnecessary and is based on the false presumption that the organs of deceased people are the property of the state rather than the family. Furthermore there is no proof it increases organ donations.

‘Presumed consent legislation is based on the legal fiction that people who have done nothing – neither signed an opt-in nor an opt-out register – have deliberately chosen to donate their organs.’

You could say that Peter Saunders’ comments are a good sign (that they were published at all is a step forward). However, it was the comments section which gave me some real hope. When the first article was published yesterday I think only one out of the top ten comments was in favour – everyone else, even those on the organ donor register now, said they would opt out on principle. They object strongly to the presumption of state ownership of their bodies, their organs! Some of the comments are copied below:

top comment
This was the top comment yesterday
comment 2
Another top ten comment
top ten comment
Another top ten comment from yesterday’s article

It ought to be noted that the level of public enthusiasm for the opt out system can be seen in this screen grab of the government petition started a few months ago:

public opinion

And from today’s article (an update on yesterday’s one):

organs
A rather concerning comment!
organs 2
Huge cynicism towards this government grab
organs 3
And another fully awake individual telling it like it is

Those three were in the top ten comments on today’s article.

There is hope, but there needs to be action, and I don’t think it’s going to come from my complicit MP at this time. If you are in the UK, NOW is the time to take a moment to write to your MP and express your disquiet and disapproval of this legislation – let’s get it stopped before it’s too late.

Please also pray for me as I try to navigate the role God wants me to play (if any) in highlighting this issue in an ever more dangerous world. Thank you.

God Bless

Lis

 

Deception and brutal force

In Africa they believe that albinos have magical power. They believe that in order for this power to be in the body parts, they must be cut off while the person is alive.

muti.jpg

What does this remind you of? Oh yes, organ donation. Except that we in the west declare them dead before we cut out their beating hearts and put them in other people’s bodies.

If Africa is backward, we are deceptive, devious and equally evil.

God says: “Thou shallt not kill”

Organ donation is little more than Aztec human sacrifice. It is little more than African muti – murder, theft, deception and evil beyond comprehension. Yet people continue to support organ donation through ignorance. They are deceived.

I am, as yet, to hear back from my MP, or Dan Jarvis MP regarding the emails I sent them.

God Bless you

Lis

My letter to my MP regarding organ donation opt out system

A note to you – would you please write to your MP and voice your concerns about this bill?

I wrote to my MP this morning, and thought I would share what I wrote to him with you.

Dear Mr Hancock,

I am writing to you with regard to a Private Members Bill which, I understand, is about to be presented in the House of Commons (according to this article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ health/article-4704718/My-new- lungs-don-t-work-more.html).

I have written urgently to Dan Jarvis MP, and now I am writing also to you, as my MP, to share my very great disquiet.

Informed consent is the basis for everything that is done in the way of treatment (and the withdrawal of treatment) within the NHS. However, no one has ever given informed consent to be an organ donor. Organ donation requires the donor to be alive when their organs are removed. They must still have full respiration, a beating heart etc. in order for their organs to be usable. There have been numerous cases of patients who heard doctors discuss the harvesting of their organs, and who regained consciousness and later fully recovered from their injuries. Those cases are chilling in themselves, but the plain matter of law is the matter of informed consent.

If the public do not understand that they will be alive, not cold and blue as they believe, when those organs are removed, then the continuation of the organ donor system as it stands now is based on deception!

I’ll give you an example that I also shared with Mr Jarvis:

I asked a couple of my friends whether they were on the organ donor register, and they both said no. I said to them, “Well don’t go on it.” They asked why, and I simply asked them ‘Would you like an anaesthetic when your organs are removed?” They said, “But why would I need one, I’d be dead?”

There you have the public’s understanding of organ donation in a nutshell.

Yet the government is now considering moving to an opt out system of presumed consent, which worse, not only denies most people who are ambivalent about the decision a choice, but will also ensure the continuation of the public’s ignorance of the facts of organ donation.

Let me reiterate – the public believe they will be dead in the common understanding of that word when their organs are removed. Doctors know that organs from the dead cannot be used, and so have invented new definitions of death in order to get these organs. How can this be anything other than deception, Mr Hancock?

I ask you to stand against this new bill, which I believe is a crime against the British people.

Yours sincerely

Mrs Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx

Having written to Dan Jarvis MP, and now Matthew Hancock MP, I will of course share any responses I recieve on this matter.

God Bless you

Lis