Britain’s grinning police state

Ugh!

In the wake of the Manchester bombing (which raised more questions than I care to try to address), we suddenly had armed police on the streets. Do you remember France doing the same thing after the Paris bombing? Yep. Do you also realise that ever since, there has always been some kind of ‘terror incident’ just prior to the date upon which such special measures were due to end? I hope that does not happen in this case – armed police are due to leave our streets on Monday night.

So let’s take a look at the photos of the police state as it flexes it’s oh-so-friendly muscles, shall we? I mean, who doesn’t want to experience the joy of a policeman with an automatic weapon smiling and blowing kisses to members of the public? Who wouldn’t want to be made safe by such ‘delightful’ and ‘friendly’ people? Huh?

safety police state

police state

Smiling police reassuring thousands? What about Jean Charles De Menezes? You must go and read that piece – it highlights the very reasons why more police on our streets, and specifically ones with guns, is NOT a reassuring sign.

The issue that will not be dealt with is the issue of Islam. Saudi Wahhabism has infiltrated many mosques in Britain, funded by the Saudis who then appoint the imams who are radicalising the young. Why was this ever allowed to take place?

Why have we got security forces assisting in this radicalisation – our own secret services have been accused of radicalising wives of muslim men in the UK, who then left to go and fight in Syria. How crazy is that? What are they doing? Why is this happening?

Because you must cow and weaken and make afraid the white native folks of this country if you want to bring in totalitarianism and Agenda 2030 (which has little to do with the environment, and everything to do with the management, control and selection/genocide of mankind). You simply can’t institute this kind of evil in a free and just society!

But in the wake of the Manchester incident, we see that people are calling for ‘something’ to be done.

change

‘Something’ – because it’s hard to define what we want. We want safety, and we are far from acheiving that again without some serious action.

careful.jpg

But we need to be very careful what we wish for. As I’ve written before, We risk our own freedoms every time we call for the freedoms of others around us to be curbed. Read: How to close an open society – UK version

We risk, in fact, disproportionate action against ourselves in our own land, as we call for ‘something’ to be done. How about these snippets from here: How long before UK resembles Venezuela?

venezuela
Venezuela

Preventive repression. We are not far from that:

britain
Britain

And indeed, Tommy Robinson has received numerous death threats from muslims, which Bedfordshire police have failed to take action over, yet we have people (white people, I might add) who are serving jail time for throwing bacon at a mosque.

That is what we risk, as we cry for ‘safety’ – and in fact the very notion that we, as white British people in our own country, will be safer if muslims are locked up, is simply false. They were allowed here to accomplish a goal for the NWO. It wasn’t a result of a failed experiment that we were bombed on Monday. It was the result of a plot – one of satan’s own – to bring down our people all across Europe. To persecute us, and destroy our way of life.

Grinning ‘friendly’ armed police on our streets is just an early symptom of the coming police state.

It is time to get right with God. Time is ticking on, and we don’t know when Yeshua will return. As we see the incredible acceleration of evil across the western world, we must be ready with oil in our lamps. We must be prepared in every way, but above all spiritually. Our faith must be strong.

God Bless you

Lis

The Manchester bombing – an assault on freedom

I opened Twitter this morning to see a tweet from the Russian Embassy, giving an emergency number out, with the hashtag #Manchester. It didn’t sink in straight away. Another tweet was talking about the UK’s reaction to Manchester. Oh no. Another attack?

Sadly, yes. This time, apart from the deeply occult “22 deaths on the 22nd May” I cannot see anything so far in the images I’ve seen which suggests this was faked in any way. Perhaps this time it was real terror, perhaps it was a set up. Either way, it suits evil Theresa May and her nightmarish vision of ‘security’.

You see, the media claim that four hours prior to the bomb blast, there were posts on Twitter by Isis connected accounts, which mentioned both terror and Manchester Arena.

manchester 1.png

Further down the page:

manchester 2

And the Daily Mail’s comments:

manchester 3

Be aware here – note the use of language. First of all they could tweet out about an up-coming terror attack, apparently. Then, although Twitter suspended many accounts, they state that “other euphoric supporters posted messages across Telegram and other secured messaging systems”. In other words – encryption is bad. Only bad people want to use secured messaging. Nothing about stopping bad people from coming to our country, no, and as I’ve written before, it is the perfect way to shut down an open society. People are clamouring for more security in the wake of this!

manchester 5.jpg

More security necessary? Why not have a full TSA style pat-down? Or real-time phone tapping? The problem here is Islam, but at this rate we will have to have that TSA style pat-down to go into a shopping centre. Is that what we want? NO! We want fewer terrorists (real or FAKE). More security doesn’t solve this problem.

But the narrative continues at the Daily Mail:

manchester 4

Yes, Theresa May’s plan for a new, regulated, internet – well, it’s clearly necessary, isn’t it? I mean – freedom? What do you want that for – freedom allows dangerous people to hurt your feelings, or worse, blow you up! Freedom is dangerous in the wrong hands. Apparently.  I quote from the above linked article (censored, ironically, for profanity 😉 ):

 

“We will put a responsibility on industry not to direct users – even unintentionally – to hate speech, pornography, or other sources of harm. We will make clear the responsibility of platforms to enable the reporting of inappropriate, bullying, harmful or illegal content, with take-down on a comply-or-explain basis.

Basically: we will make private internet companies our internet censorship police, or we’ll fine them millions of dollars. This will create all sorts of unnecessary problems. First, to avoid liability, companies will massively over-censor. We see this happen all the time. All sorts of perfectly fine and legitimate content will be censored just to avoid the potential liability. Second, this will be massively expensive. Sure, Facebook and Google can probably handle the expense, but no one else will be able to. If you’re trying to start the next Facebook or Google in the UK, you’re f****d. You can’t afford to police all the content on your platform, nor can you afford the potential liability. Probably best to just move somewhere else. Third, does the UK government really want private platforms like Google and Facebook making these determinations? Why is it handing off the responsibility of what kind of speech is “illegal” to private, for-profit companies (foreign companies, at that)?”

So, whilst I have immense sympathy for anyone caught up in the Manchester bombing, and feel that, of course, something needs to be done, I have no confidence in our government to not simply use this incident to further it’s own policy agenda. It’s convenient, in that it will allow the narrative of ‘more security’ to trump the calls for fewer migrants!

Another quote from the same article:

“In addition, we do not believe that there should be a safe space for terrorists to be able to communicate online and will work to prevent them from having this capability.

And this may be the most terrifying line of all here. That’s the dog whistle for “we’ll outlaw encryption” because encryption — in the minds of foolish, scaredy-cat politicians — creates “safe spaces” for terrorists. Nevermind that the same encryption creates “safe” spaces for every other person and that undermining that makes absolutely everyone less safe. This is a dangerous plan that seems to echo the words of the UK’s Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, from a few months ago, where she wanted to find people who knew the necessary hashtags to silence terrorists online. This isn’t policy making. This is nonsense.”

 

I think this makes that point rather well. We all remember the famous quote:

franklin

I couldn’t have put it better.

Satan’s plan is coming to fruition. Satan’s plan to destroy the people of God (who were once of God, and who now walk contrary to God, whom He divorced for adultery) is going rather too well. The elites, who willingly bowed down to worship satan in return for power and wealth, are all slowly orchestrating satan’s plan. They may think it’s their plan. They may believe this is what they want. But satan is doing just as God allows, and has free rein, up to a point, to bring us to our knees.

And on our knees is where we need to be.

God’s judgement is here. Do you know Christ? Are you saved? Have you repented of your sins? If not, now is the time to get right with God.

God Bless you

Lis

ISIS attack in France – are you joking with me?

Maybe you are! I was looking for evidence. No images were taken of the crime scene where a French Priest was killed. But what do we have? Indeed if you are paying attention, as you look at this article, the only, ONLY image that is poor quality, is this one:

why no shoes.jpg
Body of one of the killers?

Can I ask a few questions here? Is that OK?

Why is he not wearing any shoes? Why are his feet grey? Why is, what appears to be his hand, also grey? Why are his legs so thin that his feet can be that close together as he lays there with his legs crossed?

Could it be that he is a rubber manequin? Because I can see no possible way that by shooting him he would suddenly have no shoes on.

Do you know? I am sick of looking at this stuff and seeing their failure to make, frankly, any effort to hide their lies at this point. This is a disgrace. It’s not that I want them to do better – at least if I can see they are lies, I can tell that the coming war is a phony war.

I will, again, call false flag on this killing until, or unless, some evidence appears to the contrary.

*exasperated sigh*

God Bless you

Lis

Vital video to watch and share on Islam in the UK

This is a must watch, and must share – please send this to your MP if you are in the UK.

Our leaders and media must not deprive the public of this kind of information. What are they afraid of? That we will demand action? Why would we not? How could we not – this movement puts the country we love in danger? Future generations will not forgive us is we don’t try to stop it.

God Bless you

Lis

I hate to be a stickler

..and I’m no apologist for the evils of Islam for sure. However, it cannot escape any Law loving follower of YHWH that this chart is partially inaccurate. Let’s take a look, and then go line by line:

divine-deception-7501.jpg

Now I’m going to go line by line asking “Is it in the law?”:

Mandate for world political domination – nope, the Law is for the chosen people

Church and state must be one – nope

Religious text as political constitution – preferably, but certainly it IS today in Israel, where the prefered law would be the Talmud http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/netanyahu-basis-for-israeli-law-should-be-talmud/2014/05/08/

Full body of political, not just moral, law – preferably

Death penalty for leaving religion – nope

Death penalty for criticizing religion or founder – nope, but yes for blasphemy: “Leviticus 24:16 says, “Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.” So, yes, the Mosaic Law did require the death penalty for those who blasphemed the name of God.” (source)

Women treated as inferiors – yes in so far as being a Patriarchal system

Dual standard for believers and non-believers – yes – usury could be exacted from foreigners, not brothers

Mandated tax on non-believers – nope

Mandate for terror as tactic for expansion – not in the Law, but yes, if you count the destruction of Jericho as an example from the Old Testament. In fact Rahab knew of their previous attacks and that their God had given them the land. She was in awe of their God because she had heard this.

Lying sanctioned as “moral” – nope, except in the Talmud

Maiming, torture, beheading or stoning as part of practice – stoning and maiming, yes, although not practiced today – Yeshua taught us to apply the Law with mercy.

Invalidation of other religions – yes, absolutely, because every other god is a demon god, and not YHWH.

Destroys other religions’ houses of worship – yes, we are CALLED to do exactly what ISIS has done, and destroy their temples and groves and places of worship, we just don’t.

Force and violence against non-believers – nope

Churches promote political agendas – nope, but certainly the law was to be taught in the churches – Yeshua commanded us to do just that.

Religious leaders can order adherents to war – yes, on God’s command this happened a lot in the Old Testament. It doesn’t happen today.

Adherents are part of a de-facto political nation regardless of geographical location or political boundaries – kind of, yes.We are called to keep ourselves separate, no matter where we are, and to keep God’s Law. A people peculiar to our God.

Now you might think I’m shooting myself in the foot writing this, but I just want you to see that indeed the biblical law is very strict and very strong. It isn’t like sharia, because Yeshua came to show us how to apply it – with MERCY, allowing those who had sinned to repent and ‘Go and sin no more.’ But God was always clear that we were to put sin away from among us – we were not to tolerate sin, because sin spreads much quicker than goodness does!

I’m sorry also if this seems uncomfortable to you, I just want to present the facts here as best I know them.

There is, however a huge difference between the plans and wants of adherents of Christianity/Judaism today and Islam – the Law doesn’t allow for expansionist forced conversion. It doesn’t allow adherents to rape women and men. It doesn’t allow for lots of what we are seeing Islamists doing. Islam is a carnal religion.

But we must be clear, if we love the Law, that it is what God wanted for us – even though we do not, and cannot apply it (nor do we seek to) today. Our obedience to God’s Law is a sign of covenant between us and Him – it sets us apart. It is not, and never will, take away  other’s free will, even though their free will may result in judgement coming down on our nations.

I feel this is an important post – that we must see in that chart that what God truly stands for, and what He requires us to stand for is NOT the way our faith is taught or practised (nor is Judaism). In other words the Jews and us Christians are in open rebellion against God’s Law.

God Bless you

Lis

Bosom? Meet viper…

Yes this young lady, a viper if ever there was one in the bosom of the Labour party, and this country:

bosom meet viper

At the very least she is bringing dishonour (and the curses of God) on the Labour party. At worst she is promoting nuclear war to destroy the land of Israel, and of course in doing that Jerusalem, which God loves. God says of Abraham’s seed:

Genesis 12:3 “And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”

Of Jerusalem:

“The Bible has nearly 800 references to Jerusalem- called “the City of our God” (Ps. 48:1,8) Jerusalem is God’s city, the city of Zion, he has invested his name there (Daniel 9:19).

Jerusalem is called the city of the great King (Matt.5:35). Yahweh is called “the God of Israel,” He is NOT called the God of any other nation in this manner, The God of Jerusalem is key to the Jewish people, to Jesus and to the end of the age.” (source)

This silly girl ought to know better.

God Bless you

Lis

What the media won’t tell you about the Cologne attacks – 81 men were raped on that New Year’s Eve

If you take a look and trawl through the statistics as I just have you will see that amongst the many many crimes committed that night (1,049) there were 266 rapes and sexual assaults of women, and 81 rapes and sexual assaults of men. This is just me counting by eye, and I may have missed one or two, but the question which comes to mind is: Why have the media hidden this from us?

Are they trying to suggest that these vile packs of men were only targetting women and that a city like Cologne normally has 81 male rapes and sexual assaults on a New Year’s Eve? Well that seems highly unlikely to me.

You can read the statistics for yourself (Link) – perhaps you can tell me I’m wrong and these vile crimes didn’t take place.

By highlighting these 81 male rapes, I am not in any way diminishing the crimes on women – this is a completely despicable, and abhorent crime whichever sex you are. I just want to know why the press haven’t told us, haven’t made these statistics clear so that we can see that frankly no-one is safe with these perverted and carnal people around. This is a small screen grab of the statistics from Cologne Police:

male rape Cologne

This is a sign of a perverted sickness – and worse than that a MORAL COWARDICE in the media to EXPOSE these filthy, dirty dogs who committed these crimes.

Islam is a carnal religion – death for honour and for jihad means getting to heaven, and so important are the 70 virgins promised to these carnal souls that they will even protect their manhood during battle to ensure it’s still in good working order when they get their virgins!

armor

Yes. Really.

Why else do their women have to cover up? Because they are not taught any self control, and view anything ‘on show’ as fair game.

Watch the video I posted here for more on sexuality in Islam: Sexuality in Islam – Ann Barnhardt MUST WATCH

God Bless you

Lis