Novichok false flag comes to Salisbury again

I don’t often report on false flags these days because the time it takes to explain and provide details is too much – I hope that by now you’re all as jaded with the jokes being played on us as I am. If so, you are naturally going to assume it’s fake unless indicated otherwise. But the anti-Russia rhetoric continues – how else can Treason May reunite Europe and get us to accept military unification with Europe (which is happening right now)? She must have a bogeyman, and that bogeyman is the one white country which isn’t playing ball with the elites. As the attack poodle of the elites, Mrs May must convince us to go to war against our own race again – notice how WWI and WWII were both wars within the white race. Hmmm.

Anyway, Novichok has raised it’s ugly head again and this time we can laugh heartily because we know it’s all theatre. I can’t embed the video from this page, but please go and watch it:

Link

If you watched it and didn’t see what’s in front of your face you are not alone – most people don’t. So why is it suspicious? Why do I say it’s a false flag?

Paramedics in hazmat suits, yes – but their wrists and heads are exposed. Those police helping them have no protection at all (from a deadly “military grade” nerve agent????). Bare arms and faces uncovered. No this is not a deadly nerve agent, this is theatre. False, fake and we are being led around by the nose – enough!

Salisbury Novichok event is another FALSE FLAG. Do not be fooled.

Lis

Advertisements

Traitor: Macron urges Europeans to reject the “leprosy” of self-will

Oh goodness! What a slimeball!

Talks are underway with UN agencies over plans to set up so-called ‘regional disembarkation platforms’ in countries like Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Niger and Tunisia. 

The European Commission said it envisaged deals that fully protect migrants rescued at sea, under a proposal that will be debated at next week’s EU summit in Brussels.  […]

It comes as French President Emmanuel Macron warned that populism was spreading across Europe like ‘leprosy’ and that Europeans should fight more vigorously instead of criticising the actions of pro-European governments like his.

Link

Yes, you read that right – talks are underway to create camps for MIGRANTS – you’ll notice they don’t even try calling them refugees anymore. The plan is white genocide, coming to a country where YOU LIVE. And Macron is telling us to embrace our NWO future. No thanks. (I note on the article that the comments are moderated in advance – i.e. the agenda must be protected, and you aren’t going to get your voice heard. No wonder we are all “populists” now!)

Bible quote time:

Revelation 17:15

And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.

Revelation 12:15-16

And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.

Yes, they are coming, they are meant to destroy us, and this is a judgement of God. We must repent if we are to be protected in the time to come.

Lis

Goldman Sachs Analyst: Curing Patients Not a Sustainable Medical Business Model

There’s that word “sustainable” again. This from GreenMedInfo.com:

One of the most reviled companies in the United States recently gave Americans yet another reason to distrust their power: A recent Goldman Sachs report reveals the company questioning whether or not curing chronic illness is compatible with a sustainable business model.

In an internal report viewed by CNBC about the potential of the biotech industry and gene therapy titled “The Genome Revolution,” analysts asked: “Is curing patients a sustainable business model?”

“The potential to deliver ‘one shot cures’ is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy and gene editing,” wrote analyst Salveen Richter. “However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies,” analyst Richter wrote in the April 10 report.

“While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.“

Richter cited a Hepatitis C drug manufactured by Gilead Sciences that achieved a 90% cure rate. As CNBC noted:

“The company’s U.S. sales for these hepatitis C treatments peaked at $12.5 billion in 2015, but have been falling ever since. Goldman estimates the U.S. sales for these treatments will be less than $4 billion this year, according to a table in the report.”

In light of the reduced profits as a result of the success of the drug, Richter wrote:

“GILD is a case in point, where the success of its hepatitis C franchise has gradually exhausted the available pool of treatable patients. In the case of infectious diseases such as hepatitis C, curing existing patients also decreases the number of carriers able to transmit the virus to new patients, thus the incident pool also declines … Where an incident pool remains stable (eg, in cancer) the potential for a cure poses less risk to the sustainability of a franchise.”

Indeed, cancer is a highly profitable disease. In 2015, the world spent $107 billion on cancer drugs, and according to 2016 projections, that number was expected to grow to $150 by 2020. Further, Gilead Sciences, which Richter singled out as a company losing profits due to cures, was still the second-most profitable pharmaceutical/biotech company in the world in 2017, earning over $12 billion in net income.

Richter, who did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment, offered several ideas to cope with the ‘problem’ of healing patients. He suggested targeting large markets, such as those suffering from hemophilia, because “Hemophilia is a $9-10bn WW market (hemophilia A, B), growing at ~6-7% annually.” in addition, he advised clients to target disorders with high incidences, such as spinal dystrophy, as well as focus on “[c]onstant innovation and portfolio expansion.”

Additionally, Ars Technica reported, the analysis “hints that, as such cures come to fruition, they could open up more investment opportunities in treatments for ‘disease of aging.’”

Goldman Sachs confirmed the authenticity of the report to Ars Technica but declined to comment on its contents.

© Saturday, April 14th 2018 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.”

God Bless you

Lis

Facial recognition used to catch fugitive among 60,000 concert-goers in China

We should be very concerned about this – the article treats this as though it’s some kind of amazing breakthrough, but others have had their lives ruined by errors in these systems. Facial recognition cameras are not fool proof!

Its the ultimate music lover’s fantasy – being picked out of the audience by your idol at a huge rock concert for a fleeting moment of on-stage fame and adulation.

But in China, you are more likely to be picked out by one of thousands of police surveillance cameras which link people to crimes through advanced facial recognition technology.

That’s what happened last week to a 31-year-old man who was held by police for questioning over an “economic dispute” as he waited with more than 60,000 fans of Hong Kong’s Jacky Cheung for a night of pumping Cantopop.

The suspect, who was identified only as Mr Ao, had driven almost 60 miles to the concert in the south-eastern city of Nanchang with his wife and several friends, reports say.

But shortly after the music began, police approached him to say that his facial features indicated he was wanted in connection with an economic crime they had investigated in the nearby Guangxi region.

“The suspect was shocked that he was found among tens of thousands of people, “ said Li Jin, a local police officer, according to the China Daily.

It’s the latest example of facial recognition being used to catch suspects for a wide range of crimes and misdemeanours in China.

Link

It’s Orwellian in the extreme!

Here’s the other side – what happens when it goes wrong, and I urge you to read the full story linked at the end. This is only part of a much longer story – the poor guy was put through the mill!

It was just after sundown when a man knocked on Steve Talley’s door in south Denver. The man claimed to have hit Talley’s silver Jeep Cherokee and asked him to assess the damage. So Talley, wearing boxers and a tank top, went outside to take a look.

Seconds later, he was knocked to the pavement outside his house. Flash bang grenades detonated, temporarily blinding and deafening him. Three men dressed in black jackets, goggles, and helmets repeatedly hit him with batons and the butts of their guns. He remembers one of the men telling him, “So you like to fuck with my brothers in blue!” while another stood on his face and cracked two of his teeth. “You’ve got the wrong guy,” he remembers shouting. “You guys are crazy.”

Talley was driven to a Denver detention center, where he was booked for two bank robberies — the first on May 14 and the second on September 5, 2014, 10 days before his arrest — and for assaulting an officer during the second robbery.

After surveillance camera images of the September robbery were publicly distributed, three of Talley’s acquaintances called in with tips to the police hotline, noting similarities between Talley’s appearance and the robber’s. A detective then showed photographs of both the May and September robber to Talley’s estranged ex-wife. “That is Steven,” she told him. “That is my ex-husband.”

The identifications justified Talley’s detention, even though he claimed he had been at work as a financial adviser for Transamerica Capital when the May robbery took place. Talley said he was held for nearly two months in a maximum security pod and was released only after his public defender obtained his employer’s surveillance records. In a time-stamped audio recording from 11:12 a.m. on the day of the May robbery, Talley could be heard at his desk trying to sell mutual funds to a potential client. Nine miles north, a white male wearing a black baseball cap, red athletic jacket, white shorts, and black sneakers entered a U.S. Bank, where he threatened the teller, hid $2,475 in his shirt, wrestled with an off-duty officer, and jumped down a flight of 10 stairs to the parking lot. At the same time as Talley was trying to close a deal, parking lot surveillance tapes show the robber tumbling with the officer, escaping his grip, and jogging away.

Link

Steve Talley is now fighting for compensation, his story shared publically as a warning to others of what can happen when things go wrong. Do you think China compensates its mistaken identity victims? Do you think they are ever seen again, more importantly? We mustn’t let China’s use of this technology convince us that it’s effective or safe.

I’ll leave you with this quote from the article linked above:

“It is dangerous for a video examiner to tell the court that the person on video is the defendant. If it were that easy, there would be little need for trials in a surveillance society and that’s a frightening thought.”

You have been warned.

God Bless you

Lis

The UK is implementing UN Agenda 2030

Britain has a pothole problem. They have sprung up everywhere and for some reason they aren’t getting filled. This is dangerous for road users, whether car drivers or those on motocycles or bicycles. In many of the Daily Mail’s comment sections, there are folks full of ire that we are spending money on bombing Syria when we can’t even get our potholes filled!

But sadly as with all the nudge tactics of our rulers, the potholes are just that – a nudge. Local authorities state they don’t have the money to repair roads, and this is the beginning, surely, of those roads being deemed “unsustainable.” UN Agenda 2030’s Sustainable development goals will require “unsustainable” things to be defunded, leaving people with the stark choice of whether to stay living in rural areas where they get fewer and fewer services or move to a smart city. The headline says it all:

NFU.jpg

The National Farmer’s Union has just stated that:

‘Some local authorities have suggested they don’t have enough money to maintain the entire network of rural roads. We fear this could lead to closures and huge disruption for local communities.

‘Farmers and other people in rural areas would be forced to make huge diversions to make journeys that are currently half a mile or so in length, but closures would lead to motorists having to loop round much longer routes.’

Link

And of course if they’re having to drive further that’s also unsustainable – many rural folk are low waged, and travelling further will only make the choice to move to a stack and pack high-rise in a smart city ever easier to make.

Which is what the government wants. They want the rural communities to be lost, and they have an agenda to bring that in, using carefully couched language, some of which has rather a cold tone to it:

leave no one behind.jpg

Leave no one behind? What about those who WANT to live in rural communities? Hmmm – you can read the full report from the UK government here: Link

So I have written to the chairman of my local branch of the NFU today to put this to him, and I will let you know if I get a response. The NFU has a voice, I told him, and they must use it! They must come out against Agenda 2030 while there is still time to stop it.

God Bless you

Lis

Trump lights the touchpaper

Oh dear. This isn’t good.

trump

Link

I think this game of conkers has gone far enough. Unfortunately the elites who really control things are pulling his strings, and Trump has fallen for a lie. There was no chemical attack, but if they can produce a teensy bit of footage, the outrage will ignite Trumps fury and they can get on with their proxy war in Syria.

But why now? Yes, that’s a very good question? The reputation of Russia has been dragged through the mud ever since Trump took office (prior to that Obama was trying, but it wasn’t working). Every lie that has been spread about the Russians and their attempts to influence elections or whatever was all because of this Syrian conflict.

At this point Syria has almost completely won the war with Russia’s help, and so a false flag was needed to try to convince the public (? really? we don’t matter, perhaps to merely convince Trump et al) that Assad had decided to attack his own people right at the point where the war was won. The issue is that the United States cannot allow Assad to win this war, nor the Russians to help him to victory – every means, fair or foul, must be used to create a new military threat there, and allow ‘Murica to wade in with its size 10’s and made another bloody mess!

f in freedom.jpg

Ugh!

All of this will be laid at the feet of the next generation – a tax on all their future earnings. War is not cheap.

We see that Theresa May has decided not to leap into Syria “without evidence” however I suspect she may be persuaded (I pray not!).

All any of us can do at this point is to continue to SPEAK THE TRUTH to whoever will listen – people in the supermarket queue is necessary!

Some people are awake – these are the top two comments on the DM article linked above:

top two comments

Not one of the top ten comments support this action.

I’m tired of banging this drum, but while I see injustice, I have to speak out about it. Again, I urge you to listen to and support the UK Column. This was their Monday show – they talked extensively about the “evidence” or lack of in Syria for this chemical attack amongst other things.

I pray that Assad and Putin will be protected and able to do their jobs. I pray for wisdom and clarity for Trump and May and the other puppets – let them not be used to form a third world war!

God Bless you

Lis

The London police now have a firm definition of thought-crime – by Jon Rappoport

“Whether he went on with the diary, or whether he did not go on with it, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed—would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper—the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you.” (George Orwell, “1984”)

Welcome back, George. Things are playing out as you predicted.

From the UK Met Police website, here is the latest official attempt to censor speech. It’s actually more than that. Read carefully while pointing a fan at the screen to disperse the noxious fumes:

“If someone does something that isn’t a criminal offence but the victim, or anyone else, believes it was motivated by prejudice or hate, we would class this as a ‘hate incident’. Though what the perpetrator has done may not be against the law, their reasons for doing it are. This means it may be possible to charge them with an offence.”

Really.

It—an action or statement—isn’t a crime, but the perpetrator’s reasons for “doing it” may spring from hatred—and then it turns into a crime.

via The London police now have a firm definition of thought-crime