Why did Fascism fail?

We have been told that Fascism was bad. In fact those who began the movement are shunned and derided by the media even today. One amongst them was Sir Oswald Mosley. He and his British Union of Fascists stood against war, and believed in a United Europe of individual nations. He wanted no more “brother wars”. This is an admirable aim.

I watched this video the other day, and apart from the obvious reverence it has for Mosley, you get to hear a lot of him in his own words. It’s well worth a watch.

This article also appeared around the same time, and I thought it fascinating. I urge you to read it all (link below), but I quote from there:

First and foremost, Fascism is an economic system in which a nation’s government plays a central role in monitoring all banking, trade, production, and labor activity which takes place within the nation. Such monitoring is done for the sole purpose of safeguarding & advancing the nation and its people. Under Fascism, the government will not approve of any business activity unless that business has a positive impact on the nation as a whole and the people of the nation – this is the axiom which determines everything within the economic aspect of Fascism.

In other words, the government asks, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for our nation and our people?” If yes, it’s approved. If no, it’s not approved. When they ask, “Is it good?”, they mean, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for the workers, do they pay a fair wage, do they produce a product or provide a service which advances our nation & our people technologically, morally, spiritually, health-wise, etc???” For example, a pornography company would not be allowed because pornography corrupts people generally and exploits & degrades women particularly. Also, “free” trade agreements (such as what the U.S. has with China) would never be allowed because such trade agreements result in companies sending jobs overseas (where labor is dirt cheap). Such an activity, of course, would undermine a nation’s labor class. This is entirely unacceptable and thus not allowed under a Fascist economic model.

Fascism is based on free enterprise – but with constraints (the primary constraint being, “Is the particular economic activity in question good for our nation/people?”). Also, a businessman can become wealthy in a Fascist country, and the government has no objection to this (this is in stark contrast to Communism). Fascism also encourages private ownership of property (again, in stark contrast to Communism where private property is not allowed). (Link)

That all sounds pretty good. When you listen to Sir Oswald Mosley you cannot help but be moved by the power and wisdom of his words. Fascism is in the interest of the people – it supports free enterprise as long as that does not harm the people. It’s a philosophy, if you like, of growing. It’s a growth mindset – growth of a strong and stable people with their culture and their minds protected from filth so often peddled by, well let’s face it, Marxists/Communists and their ilk.

So why did it fail. You are going to take the words out of my mouth, I’m sure. Because God was not in it, because we, as a people, had turned our backs on God. It is one thing to call yourself a Christian, it’s another thing to walk with God and keep His commandments and His statutes. This we did not do – and so the healthy and well run country we could have had, perhaps, under Fascism was replaced with every despicable lust legalised. We ended up with war followed by debauchery (homosexuality, feminism, abortion) where we could have had strength and peace – and all because we thought we could do it of ourselves. We, as a Fascist nation could stand like the Tower of Babel – doing it for ourselves in the face of God, and God would rightly not allow it.

When we design a utopia, which Fascism could have been (much more than Communism), we stand in direct opposition to God when His Law is not our law.

Praise God that His Law stands forever. Praise God for the revelation of His words to so many again today. Praise God that He is merciful to those who love and trust in Him.

God Bless you

Lis

Communism – the politics of envy and musings on some Kenyan Missionaries

South African Blacks had not spend time creating a written language, let alone building houses when the Whites arrived. Yet now, the Black ANC Communist government there wants to expropriate not just the LAND settled by Whites, but their entire homes – buildings that were never the property of anyone BUT those who built them. Just take a look at the result of the politics of envy in South Africa – before and after a farm is handed to Blacks.

note_050514_192640_1.jpg

Blacks are not, and never have been, farmers. South Africa will starve before these idiots think to consider the impact of expropriation laws.

I feel so much for the South African Boer Farmers.

Screenshots_2016-06-12-13-42-14.png

Please pray that God will HEAR our prayers for them, and their prayers for their country.

I want to add to this – I wrote this piece yesterday and didn’t get round to posting it. When I went to church yesterday evening, part of the evening was devoted to a series of messages from people who know the church and who are elsewhere in the world right now. The first was from a couple who are out in Kenya as missionaries. Well their video showed things as they really are on the ground.

The husband, talking to camera, says that at first they tried to grow enough Maize that the whole village would be fed. Then they realised that the community had become dependent on them. So they decided to use their bull to plough land for the villagers so that they themselves could grow enough Maize to feed themselves. Then they realised, he said, that the villagers had become dependent on them for the use of the bullock. So then they tried to help the villagers by encouraging them to own and look after their own cattle for this purpose. They have also encouraged the villagers to form a cooperative, which they have facilitated by setting up meetings to get them together to do this, allowing them to make a profit from their produce. The locals are very pleased with this.

My question: When will the white man realise that these African Blacks do not have it in them to better themselves? It is clear from what this White missionary was saying that in order to trade, in order to have even enough food for the village they had needed the input of an organising missionary couple! What does this say about the politics of greed in South Africa? These Blacks are not made of the same stuff as we are – they are mostly nomadic hunter gatherers. Their IQ is very much lower than the average White.

I am happy for this village that they have had this help, but let’s not allow our Europe to be swamped by Blacks with only enough get-up-and-go to leave their country which they could not make great themselves. Blacks in Africa have been sitting on some of the very best land the world has to offer, yet they have not travelled to trade, built factories, built houses in the main, created a written language, written books, nor created any philosophy – no wonder they were ripe for Communism’s evil claws!

I am grateful that this missionary couple are able to help this village, but I also wonder what kind of conversion they can hope to achieve in people who are so easily dependent on them. Dependency on God is what they need, yet that requires faith, which I can only hope they are able to really connect with.

In the meantime, it is clear that, in South Africa at least, the politics of envy is busy stealing the hard work of Whites, and for what? If every time Blacks get their hands on the ‘goodies’ they see the Whites have built and maintained for years, they allow them to fall into rack and ruin, the country will starve. I honestly have to say I suspect the Blacks are not bright enough to understand, in the main, what it takes to keep a property maintained. Very sad.

God Bless you

Lis

Abuse of government power in defining “mental health” – a juxtaposition

It’s not the first time, oh no, but this needs to be commented on, and these two articles juxtaposed so that you can see, if nothing else, the immense irony!

Firstly let me clarify that in the Soviet Union, psychiatry was abused as a method of silencing political dissent:

There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union,[1] based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem.[2] It was called “psychopathological mechanisms” of dissent.[3]

During the leadership of General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev, psychiatry was used to disable and remove from society political opponents (“dissidents”) who openly expressed beliefs that contradicted the official dogma. (source)

On the basis of that understanding, let’s just take a quick look at these two articles – I quote: [emphasis added]

Recently, Virginia public schools ruled that transgender bathrooms would be allowed in Virginia public schools, and it also made a school law stating that if any student criticizes the transgender agenda in Virginia public schools they will be expelled. Now to me, that is just leftist bullcrap public schools cannot censor free speech on campus it is unconstitutional to do so. And for some reason, the public school system in the United States thinks hate speech should be censored as they continue to indoctrinate children with liberal ideals. (source)

And compare that with this: [emphasis added]

After all of the recent coverage Intellihub News & Politics has given to the Targeted Individual community, exposing the Deep State for what it’s worth, the NY Times recently came out with a hit piece in an attempt to take away the validity of the matter. […]

The author went on to point out that anyone who believes in “gang stalking” or believes that they have seen “operatives” may in fact be nuts.

Additionally, in the piece, the author made mention of how some mental health “specialists” believe that “these individuals represent an alarming development in the history of mental illness: thousands of sick people, banded together and demanding recognition on the basis of shared paranoias.” (source)

Oh the irony! So targeted individuals are crazy, but the transgender community: “thousands of sick people, banded together and demanding recognition” is absolutely fine, and will be enshrined and protected in law, and any dissenters silenced/expelled/re-educated.

This is pure Cultural Marxism – (I mistyped that at first as Vultural – yes, almost more appropriate – they are Vutures!)

Keep speaking the abhorrent truth people – the take over is in full swing.

God Bless you

Lis

Talmudist Marxist communist links to Nelson Mandela

Oh… hum…. this is quite shocking (well it was, for me). Many of you will not be surprised at all! This is a quote from Mike Smith: [my emphasis added]

…on the 11th of July 1963, a week before Nelson Mandela’s birthday, the police arrested a string of top Communists and ANC members on Lilliesleaf Farm, Rivonia, North of Johannesburg.

They were manufacturing bombs and planning the violent overthrow of South Africa that would have lead to an invasion by foreign communist forces.

The shocking details of this evil plot called Operation Mayibuye (A Zulu word meaning, let it return, as in let the country return to the blacks), the brainchild of Arthur Goldreich, came out during the trial and are extremely well documented in the book “Rivonia Unmasked” – Lauritz Strydom available at Ostara Publications

The Rivonia trial was open to the scrutiny and criticism of the media of the world and highly regarded as a fair trial…[…]

The goal of Operation Mayibuye was to unleash 7000 armed and trained Marxist terrorist onto the country, who would then recruit more members and launch sabotage and terror campaigns murdering millions of white people including blacks suspected of being collaborators or informers to the white government. The country would then be plunged into chaos and under these conditions several communist countries would invade South Africa.

Mandela and his co-conspirators were sent to life imprisonment by Judge Quartus de Wet, judge-president of the high court of the Transvaal. The judge said that they were actually guilty of high treason for which the punishment would have been the death penalty (by hanging) , but because the state prosecutor, Percy Yutar did not prosecute them for high treason, rather the four lesser charges of sabotage, conspiracy to commit sabotage, recruiting and training terrorists and soliciting funds from communist countries for a terrorist onslaught against the country, they got life in prison.

On page 89 of “Rivonia Unmasked” it says “The State had elected, ‘for reasons which need not be detailed here’, to indict the accused on counts of sabotage; but in reality, Dr Yutar declared, the case was a classical instance of high treason.”

Dr. Yutar, for some or other reason decided that high treason would have been too difficult to prove and rather pursued the lesser charges of sabotage, etc.

In Rivonia unmasked, Dr. Yutar said himself that the documents seized and produced as evidence was enough to get a conviction. He also had more than 200 people he could call as witnesses. Yutar also said that the munitions and weapons found were enough to blow up a city the size of Johannesburg.
As an excellent lawyer he would have had no problem to get the high treason conviction.

Problem was that of the 19 arrested, Goldberg, Bernstein, Hepple, Wolpe, Kantor and Goldreich were Jews, Kathrada and Nair were Indian, and Sisulu, Mbeki, Motsoaledi and Mhlaba were Xhosa, while Walter Sisulu had a Xhosa mother and a white father.

If they were all convicted of high treason, Dr Percy Yutar, a Jew himself, would have sent six fellow Jews to the gallows and the National Party of South Africa would have hanged six Jews which would have been a PR disaster and would have caused an outcry and possible accusations of “Nazism” against the SA government. (source)

So a Marxist plot, started by a Jew (Talmudist), they get caught but are not tried and sentenced for the crime they actually committed because of blatant pro-semitism (which is a form of racism in itself).

This operation and it’s intended aim was to wipe out whites in South Africa. The ANC government today is COMMUNIST, do you think that Communism can ever be pro-white or even simply pro-humanity?

Communism is the devil’s politics.

God Bless you

Lis

Hmmm, what a question to ask…

income.jpg
What would you do if your income were taken care of?

I think the simple answer to that (and one that ought to act as a deterrent to any idiocratic government considering paying people to not work) is:

‘Make trouble’.

I think that’s what a lot of people would do. The majority of the ‘left’ certainly do now, on benefits! Just imagine if all those unable to find work didn’t have to worry about unemployment coming to an end.

I think the militia in America might just get a WHOLE lot larger. I think ‘they’ know this, and it would lead to immense totalitarian government very quickly.

My advice is that this is a very bad idea. A very, very bad one indeed.

Source: Link

God Bless you

Lis

Peter Hitchens nails it –

I read his piece yesterday in the Mail on Sunday – an he get’s it just right. I agree with him:

“As an extremist, I am very worried about the planned Extremism Bill, which our Prime Minister is about to ram through Parliament.

So should you be. You are probably extremists, too, or will soon become extremists.

You may well remember when many opinions now viewed as despicable and more or less criminal were freely expressed – often by the same people and media who now condemn them.

I certainly do. Much of the conservative patriotic Christianity which my parents’ generation saw as normal has now been driven underground, and those who express it – especially in the public sector – face discipline or the sack, and are sometimes prosecuted.

Many of the current establishment’s attacks on Labour aren’t disagreements among free people in a free society. They are demands for abject recantations expressed by people who clearly think such views should not be allowed.

And the expression ‘extremism’ doesn’t mean anything objective or measurable. It just means a view that is out of favour with the current government and establishment.[…]

Yet, instead, we waste our time and destroy our freedom by futile attempts to control what people think.”

Yes, Peter, as an extremist myself – for example, I believe that homosexuality is a sin, and as such I’m likely to be viewed as though I might want to throw a gay man off a tall building which is the very last thing I would do, or condone, but hey, I’m an extremist. If you’re reading this blog, you probably are too.

You are committing a thought crime by even considering that the world is flat, just as God said it was. You are committing a thought crime by questioning the media’s version of events surrounding any of the too-numerous-to-mention false flag attacks, most notably 9/11. For being against war. For believing that unfettered immigration is treason against the British people. I could go on…

Get ready to be locked up for what you believe. What goes on in your head is no longer “nobody’s business” when your very facial expression can be read by a facial recognition camera and have you logged for further surveillance.

I am saddened that we have reached this point of all-out Stasi state, all out Communism in fact. It looks like fascism, but they are really the same. Easiest to refer to it as totalitarianism. That it certainly is.

God Bless you

Lis

How to bring down Europe in a few easy steps

First of all, bomb the heck out of the Middle East, and send all those fleeing into camps run by the UN and it’s NGO affiliates.

Then stop paying them in the camps so they’ll flee.

Then give them boats (how else did they get them?) and suggest they might like to go to Germany, Sweden and so on! Make sure they have life-jackets (yes, someone is supplying them with free life-jackets.) Basically: support a Muslim invasion of Europe.

lifejackets.jpg

Don’t forget to enlist the media to preach that these are ‘refugees’ fleeing a ‘warzone’ (rather than nice safe camps). Make sure when there are losses of life from these dangerous journeys to milk them for all they are worth, rather than facing the fact that these are Muslim invading armies who wish to destroy Europe.

Give them money and entitlements.

This is classic Cloward Piven Strategy. I’ve written about it before here: Link, but I’ll add a quote from there fore you:

“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Inspired by the August 1965 riots in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles (which erupted after police had used batons to subdue a black man suspected of drunk driving), Cloward and Piven published an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. Following its publication, The Nation sold an unprecedented 30,000 reprints. Activists were abuzz over the so-called “crisis strategy” or “Cloward-Piven Strategy,” as it came to be called. Many were eager to put it into effect.

In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.” [emphasis added] (source)

migrant army.jpg

Cloward and Piven would be proud. Apparently Norway is taking precautions as Sweden is on the verge of collapse due to the migrant crisis there, and indeed, Sweden has a lot to answer for – here we have Sir Peter Sutherland, a man who seeks to UNDERMINE the homogeneity of European nations – with mass migration, which he is in favour of. He works for the UN, and used to work for Goldman Sachs… (Remember when I wrote about ‘restocking the farm’? Link – the banks want this migration).

homogeneity.png

What Sir Peter and his cohorts really want is a truly homogenous Europe, where a white face is rarely seen. Where everyone is equally poor, and where islam becomes a dominant and massively destructive force. If they don’t want this, why enable and foment it?

So I have a message for our dear European leaders, including Mr Cameron:

We will vote OUT of Europe!

God Bless us all

Lis