Should Christians keep the Law of Moses?

This is Part 1 of a four part series I’m putting out regarding the rational basis for keeping the Law of Moses. To me it is the most irrational thing that any Christian believes they are “not under the law” – try telling the traffic cop that! You are going to be governed by something and someone – shouldn’t that be God’s Law and God?

Shabbat Shalom to you all!


Judgement must begin at the house of God (1 Peter 4:17)

Today we see that education secretary Justine Greening thinks that the Church of England should change its stance on same sex marriage, in line with the modern world.

I quote: (Link)

She told Sky News: ‘I think it is important that the church in a way keeps up and is part of a modern country.

‘I wouldn’t prescribe to them how they should deal with that but I do think we are living in a country where people broadly recognise that attitudes are in a different place now to where they were many, many years ago.

‘We have allowed same sex marriage, that is a massive step forward for the better and for me, I think people do want to see our major faiths keep with modern attitudes in our country.’

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight! Of course, because keeping up with the fading morals of a depraved society is, apparently, exactly what the church should do. Who on earth would agree with that if they had ever read the bible? Well there are enough hypocritical preachers around, saying exactly that, teaching that we are wrong to condemn homosexual behaviour. The church is very much divided on this issue, conflating love and license into one horrible mess which is offensive to God.

The comments I have seen regarding her speech, of course, are all along the same lines, of ‘try telling the mosques to do that!’

But islam is keeping some kind of law. It’s law is a counterfeit of God’s Law, but they are not hypocritical about it, and indeed I have said before that I believe it is God’s judgement on His lost people (Europe) to be ruled over by sharia, since they will not rule themselves by His Torah!

Judgement begins at the house of God – the C of E will abandon, shortly, I suspect, all pretence of biblical belief, having already embraced transgender sex reassignment blessings (!), thus showing they do not believe that God is all powerful and infallible! God does not make mistakes.

There is little hope in any of our churches – one by one they will either succumb to this foolishness, or they will be forced to (again they are all hypocrites, so this judgement has to come).

The church teaches that the law is done away with – it teaches that we are under Grace, as if that alone should cover all our guilt. We are then left in a sea of moral decision making – because the moral code of Christianity is not bible based (because they reject the law). This leaves wide open doors for satan to come in and deceive them. They wander from one moral viewpoint to another – leaning on their own understanding as to what is right and wrong.

It’s tragic, because God’s Torah is perfect – His way and His will is for His people to have it written on our hearts. To love Him and His law and to follow it with joy!

Until, or unless we do this, we are open to error, sin, foolishness and judgement.

A prayer to pray: “Heavenly Father, teach me to love what you love, and teach me to hate what you hate!” Amen!

Read more: Homosexuality – tolerance leads to suffering

God Bless you



Why did Fascism fail?

We have been told that Fascism was bad. In fact those who began the movement are shunned and derided by the media even today. One amongst them was Sir Oswald Mosley. He and his British Union of Fascists stood against war, and believed in a United Europe of individual nations. He wanted no more “brother wars”. This is an admirable aim.

I watched this video the other day, and apart from the obvious reverence it has for Mosley, you get to hear a lot of him in his own words. It’s well worth a watch.

This article also appeared around the same time, and I thought it fascinating. I urge you to read it all (link below), but I quote from there:

First and foremost, Fascism is an economic system in which a nation’s government plays a central role in monitoring all banking, trade, production, and labor activity which takes place within the nation. Such monitoring is done for the sole purpose of safeguarding & advancing the nation and its people. Under Fascism, the government will not approve of any business activity unless that business has a positive impact on the nation as a whole and the people of the nation – this is the axiom which determines everything within the economic aspect of Fascism.

In other words, the government asks, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for our nation and our people?” If yes, it’s approved. If no, it’s not approved. When they ask, “Is it good?”, they mean, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for the workers, do they pay a fair wage, do they produce a product or provide a service which advances our nation & our people technologically, morally, spiritually, health-wise, etc???” For example, a pornography company would not be allowed because pornography corrupts people generally and exploits & degrades women particularly. Also, “free” trade agreements (such as what the U.S. has with China) would never be allowed because such trade agreements result in companies sending jobs overseas (where labor is dirt cheap). Such an activity, of course, would undermine a nation’s labor class. This is entirely unacceptable and thus not allowed under a Fascist economic model.

Fascism is based on free enterprise – but with constraints (the primary constraint being, “Is the particular economic activity in question good for our nation/people?”). Also, a businessman can become wealthy in a Fascist country, and the government has no objection to this (this is in stark contrast to Communism). Fascism also encourages private ownership of property (again, in stark contrast to Communism where private property is not allowed). (Link)

That all sounds pretty good. When you listen to Sir Oswald Mosley you cannot help but be moved by the power and wisdom of his words. Fascism is in the interest of the people – it supports free enterprise as long as that does not harm the people. It’s a philosophy, if you like, of growing. It’s a growth mindset – growth of a strong and stable people with their culture and their minds protected from filth so often peddled by, well let’s face it, Marxists/Communists and their ilk.

So why did it fail. You are going to take the words out of my mouth, I’m sure. Because God was not in it, because we, as a people, had turned our backs on God. It is one thing to call yourself a Christian, it’s another thing to walk with God and keep His commandments and His statutes. This we did not do – and so the healthy and well run country we could have had, perhaps, under Fascism was replaced with every despicable lust legalised. We ended up with war followed by debauchery (homosexuality, feminism, abortion) where we could have had strength and peace – and all because we thought we could do it of ourselves. We, as a Fascist nation could stand like the Tower of Babel – doing it for ourselves in the face of God, and God would rightly not allow it.

When we design a utopia, which Fascism could have been (much more than Communism), we stand in direct opposition to God when His Law is not our law.

Praise God that His Law stands forever. Praise God for the revelation of His words to so many again today. Praise God that He is merciful to those who love and trust in Him.

God Bless you


Pagan Christmas tree not allowed to bear a Christian cross

Hmmm. Since I began my journey in Torah some time ago, more and more things about ‘churchianity’ have bothered me. I’ve written before about the similarities of God’s law and shariah law – the irony for many lawless Christians is that being forced to live under hated shariah will be the closest they come in life to living under God’s law. Of course shariah is not from a godly faith, but it’s ironic! Read more here: Link

Moving on, this story really highlights the ill-wisdom of so many Christians – up in arms because they aren’t allowed to put a cross on top of a pagan ‘Christmas’ tree: Link



So I’m going to ask you – do you not think that the weight and power – the very tipping point of evil, has come now? Yes, God is taking aim at Christians through this act, but I’m referring to the overwhelming weight of evil – the majority of folks are either ignorant or willfully ignoring God’s laws, and His words when He says in Deuternomy 12:29-32:

29 When the Lord thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land;

30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.

31 Thou shalt not do so unto the Lord thy God: for every abomination to the Lord, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods.

32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

The last line being the most important part, because Christmas and Easter are NOT in the bible, and so instead of worshipping Him as He likes, we have ignored His feasts and appointed times, and instead, inserted our own pagan festivals in their stead. This can NEVER please God, and that is why outraged, ignorant Christians are going to shout in indignation when the pagan, satanic world around them refuses to let them dress up the pagan ‘Christmas’ tree with the precious cross of Christ.

Blunt, but it’s true.

God Bless you


Joel Osteen is NOT a hypocrite!

Nope, sireee Bob – he is, in my view, a more honest ‘Christian’ than many who purport to preach from our pulpits.

You see Joel has abandoned the law so completely that his error is OBVIOUS to us all. I quote:

When asked directly if people whom are openly practicing homosexuals are accepted into the Kingdom, Joel Osteen responded with “Absolutely, anybody is.” […]

Joel does acknowledge that some things are “sin” but says, “I don’t address these things from the pulpit. They only come up in interviews.” When asked if openly practicing gay/homosexual people will be accepted into heaven, Joel Osteen responded, “I believe they will.”

He makes no mention of the need for repentance. (source)

So unlike the churches who teach that homosexuality is sin, while handing round the ham sandwiches on SUNDAY, yep, Joel is NOT a hypocrite.

He is so obviously in error that perhaps it’s time for those churches which have partially abandoned the Law of Moses to reconsider that – specifically in light of 1 John 3:4


I love God and I love the law – it’s what helps me to walk in righteousness. I don’t do it well, but I try. Because I love God, and I want to walk in Yeshua’s footsteps and do what He did. I believe He shows us how to apply the law – with mercy.

Joel Osteen, I pray, is making some pastors reconsider their stance on the Law today.

God Bless you


Virginity – why it is important to God

I came across this image the other day – in fact as I scrolled down I found two – I’ll share them both here:

why God says what He says.jpg

why does god says what He says 2

So, is it odd that God cares what you do with your body, ladies? I am going to give you the apologetics for this, even though, really I’m not a fan of that process, because I believe obedience is so much simpler. There are many things which God says to do, and to not do, and He doesn’t take a lot of time to explain why. We are learning why in some cases, because science has caught up with some of these things, but that is absolutely no reason to wait for science to tell you that eating Pork is bad for you – if God tells you to do something, you should do it (if it’s within your power and is a personal thing you can do – i.e. dietary law, remaining a virgin).

Ok, so we’re all horrified that God says to kill women who aren’t virgins – why does He say this? Well science now has a possible explanation which might satisfy the extremist Atheists out there who simply don’t want to be told what to do by anyone, least of all God!

It’s that women may be carrying the DNA of their former sexual partners:

“When a woman breaks up with a man, she usually wants every remnant of him removed from her life. A new study suggests that, try as she might, there may be one last piece of him that she’s stuck with for good: his DNA. A study from Australia has managed to prove that fly offspring are able to resemble a mother’s previous sexual partner, even when conceived with their father’s sperm.

The idea of telegony, or previous mates influencing a woman’s offspring, has been around for centuries. It was first proposed by the Greek philosopher Aristotle and was accepted as science until the early 1900s when it was disproved and replaced by more modern genetic theory, according to the study’s press release. Unfortunately, the theory was largely used as a fear tactic to prevent women from copulating with different races or lower classes, but the study suggests the theory may have some elements of truth — for flies, at least.” (source)

But, I hear you cry – that’s just for FLIES! Well, we don’t know that yet, and indeed in other ways it’s been proven that some women carry male DNA if they’ve been pregnant with a male child (even if that child was miscarried), but some women even carried the male DNA without ever being pregnant! I quote:

“Scientists have discovered that a sizeable minority of women have Y-chromosome gene sequences in their blood. This is interesting because as you may know, Y-chromosomes are the chromosomes that belong to men, so ladies, what are they doing there, and where did they come from? […]

In the study, they took samples from 120 women who had never had sons. They found that 21% of these women had male DNA. The women were then categorized into 4 groups according to pregnancy history: Group A had only daughters, Group B had had one or more miscarriage(s), Group C had induced abortions, and Group D had never been pregnant before. The prevalence of male michrochimerism was considerably greater in Group C, although it was still present in each group: Group A 8%, Group B 22%, Group C 57%, and Group D 10%.

The conclusions of this study noted that the possible sources of male michrochimerism included known pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twins, or sexual intercourse. This means that through intercourse alone there is a potential for women to hold onto male genes and DNA within their organs and blood stream for their entire life!” (source)

Doesn’t that make you think? God KNEW this would be the case, and that when a man and woman are intimate they become one flesh – the bible tells us that. It’s not a happy thought for those of us who have made a few mistakes in life, I can tell you. However, God is a God of mercy and of Grace (which I rely on for those past things which I cannot change). I wonder, in fact, if this is another reason for some of the infertility going on today? That God is denying children to those who have too much DNA from former lovers in their bodies. It’s not every woman who carries this, and we can say that a condom protects (I’m not so sure it does – after all, intimate is intimate….) – I just think it’s very important to acknowledge that God meant what He said and knew WHY He said it!

Ideally you would marry your first love and remain together always – but life is not perfect, even if you were raised in church (and I was not). I think this information ought to make any woman think twice about casual sex, and consider the possibility that the olden days way of keeping yourself for marriage was a much better thing.

Thoughts? Please share a comment!

God Bless you


A snippet from Psalm 107

21 Oh that men would praise the Lord for his goodness, and for his wonderful works to the children of men!

22 And let them sacrifice the sacrifices of thanksgiving, and declare his works with rejoicing.

23 They that go down to the sea in ships, that do business in great waters;

24 These see the works of the Lord, and his wonders in the deep.

25 For he commandeth, and raiseth the stormy wind, which lifteth up the waves thereof.

26 They mount up to the heaven, they go down again to the depths: their soul is melted because of trouble.

27 They reel to and fro, and stagger like a drunken man, and are at their wit’s end.

28 Then they cry unto the Lord in their trouble, and he bringeth them out of their distresses.

29 He maketh the storm a calm, so that the waves thereof are still.

30 Then are they glad because they be quiet; so he bringeth them unto their desired haven.

31 Oh that men would praise the Lord for his goodness, and for his wonderful works to the children of men!

32 Let them exalt him also in the congregation of the people, and praise him in the assembly of the elders. (read more: Link)

Let us remember to praise God for His goodness to us, and to cry out to Him when we are in need, instead of trying to manage without Him. We all go through storms in life, but God is there even then to hear us, and our cry, if we will be contrite and walk with Him in His commandments and His statutes.

Dark times are coming, are you walking with love for God in your heart?

God Bless you


Controversy ahead – MUST READ

Are you nice? I’m sure you are – in fact you’re probably a total sweetheart. If you love God, it tends to make you into a nicer, more compassionate person. As my dear friend said to me yesterday, some churches have taken their compassion to the point where they have denied the truth (in the case of our conversation this related to whether homosexuality is a sin), and embraced sinners without any acknowledgement of their sin as sin! Yikes!

Well what is happening in Europe is a similar kind of ‘kidnap of conscience’ – it’s easy to be told to be nice. It’s easy to be reasoned with beyond the point of REASON! God says ‘lean not on your own understanding’ – very important. In the case of the migrant crisis I want to say that your gut is probably closer to the truth of the matter than your mind right now.

So I’m going to ask you a question. This is where the controversy is.

If another country was invading your country by boat, would you mourn those who were lost at sea in the attempt? Surely you’d petition your government to get out there with gunships and strafe their vessels with gunfire. If you were moved sufficient to rescue those who were in the water, you’d intern or deport them, at the very least, and probably more likely keep them as prisoners of war.

Yet we are being bombarded with images of dead children – the press is concerning us with the children of our enemies, and make no mistake these invaders are our enemies, they have not come here to be like us, but to make us like them. To rape white women (genocide) and take our money. They don’t want our prosperity, they want our wealth. They have not come to find a good job and contribute, but to steal our wealth (in fact have it given to them on a silver platter by our traitorous and treasonous governments).

So let us remember when we read that 2,500 invaders have been lost at sea, that this , even this, has not deterred one muslim or one black from Africa from taking their children on a boat in the same way, risking their lives.


I remember a year or two back reading a piece written by a muslim woman who said she was happy to use her children as a human shield knowing that our compassion would prevent us from shooting her if she had her child in front of her, and if they did shoot her child, well, she’d just have another. No compassion – these people are NOT LIKE US, and must be KEPT OUT of our precious Europe. Let us not make the same mistake South Africa made, and let us not, worst of all, suffer as we forced them to suffer, through sanctions for their apartheid, which they needed to keep order in their country.

I have so recently woken up to this, and it is no coincidence that South Africa should be pressed so hard on my heart that I have wept, and continue to, for their people.

On a happier note, I’ll share a prophet in the next post – good news for South Africa, if not for us, and if not for now.

God Bless you


Another in an occasional series called: ‘We’ve been lied to’


Some of the brightest minds on earth are found in the white race. Interestingly (and you’ll see why in a moment) we’re not as far ahead in those stakes as the Orientals. This poses a question, because as China enforced a strict one-child policy, which it has now abandoned, China has not, apparently, been invaded by Islam, nor has Africa’s poorest flooded to its doors. This is probably in no small part due to the structure of the country politically. Who would choose China over welfare-generous Europe?

So Europe is the destination of choice for Africans and Muslims, and we’re being told we must have this because our birth rate is so low.

It’s so low because we believed a lie called ‘over-population’, and we believed – ah, that’s it – the true difference between Europe’s low birth rate and China’s – we have feminism.

We’re idiots.

I say that as a woman, too!

Feminism says it’s the indecisive sex’s right to choose! Feminism teaches us that women are better at most things than men (because we can multitask). Feminism has caused entry exams for physically demanding roles like Firefighter to be lowered so that women can get in. Do we not think this was stupid? Good grief, did we think that we could just take control? We were GIVEN control, and we were given it for a reason. Does that have  something to do with this, I wonder? Numbers chapter 30:

1 And Moses spake unto the heads of the tribes concerning the children of Israel, saying, This is the thing which the Lord hath commanded.

2 If a man vow a vow unto the Lord, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.

3 If a woman also vow a vow unto the Lord, and bind herself by a bond, being in her father’s house in her youth;

4 And her father hear her vow, and her bond wherewith she hath bound her soul, and her father shall hold his peace at her; then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she hath bound her soul shall stand.

5 But if her father disallow her in the day that he heareth; not any of her vows, or of her bonds wherewith she hath bound her soul, shall stand: and the Lord shall forgive her, because her father disallowed her.

6 And if she had at all an husband, when she vowed, or uttered ought out of her lips, wherewith she bound her soul;

7 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at her in the day that he heard it: then her vows shall stand, and her bonds wherewith she bound her soul shall stand.

8 But if her husband disallowed her on the day that he heard it; then he shall make her vow which she vowed, and that which she uttered with her lips, wherewith she bound her soul, of none effect: and the Lord shall forgive her.

9 But every vow of a widow, and of her that is divorced, wherewith they have bound their souls, shall stand against her.

10 And if she vowed in her husband’s house, or bound her soul by a bond with an oath;

11 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at her, and disallowed her not: then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she bound her soul shall stand.

12 But if her husband hath utterly made them void on the day he heard them; then whatsoever proceeded out of her lips concerning her vows, or concerning the bond of her soul, shall not stand: her husband hath made them void; and the Lord shall forgive her.

13 Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may establish it, or her husband may make it void.

14 But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day; then he establisheth all her vows, or all her bonds, which are upon her: he confirmeth them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them.

15 But if he shall any ways make them void after that he hath heard them; then he shall bear her iniquity.

16 These are the statutes, which the Lord commanded Moses, between a man and his wife, between the father and his daughter, being yet in her youth in her father’s house.

Read it and weep!

God is a God of commandments and statutes, and I’m pretty sure (in fact I know ) that satan knows the very same rules, himself. Only we are ignorant. So white women of the west have been sold a lie – feminism – which really equates to male oppression – we have men just where we think they always had us. It began there, and has now spread widely to the minorities who are allowed to oppress you.

Am I against women’s liberation? Which western woman wasn’t really pretty free BEFORE this lie came along? Women had had access to birth control before feminism. They had had access to land and property rights and the vote long before feminism. Were those things a mistake? Until they were used by women solely, no. When I say that, what I mean is that a husband or a father had a degree of influence over that woman. Once feminism kicked in in the 1960’s, women stopped thinking they were in need of any guidance. They took their points of reference from magazines and the TV, not fuddy-duddy old Dad who said that wearing short skirts and showing everything off was wrong.

This means that today no man has any power in the eyes of a woman to stop her doing the most foolish things. Yet you see from the bible chapter that she will be held liable for her vows should a man (father or husband) not reject them on hearing them. Seriously – this is not a small thing! God knew that a woman’s judgement is not the same as a man’s. A woman needs a man to be head over her – and what is true then is as true today.

And you will note it is ONLY the white race this message of feminism was preached to, and it is the white race that is making itself extinct due to a women’s right to choose (late term abortion is now being mooted in the UK, by of all people, the head of the Midwives Association!). A woman’s right to choose, and a woman’s right to be equal (i.e. superior and have the rules changed for her, so she can get in) has destroyed femininity, and has destroyed the family. No wonder our race is in real trouble! And it is!

But just try showing this article, by a woman, I state again, to a young woman of today and she’ll think it’s stupid. Yet here I am in my 40’s childless, and alone. All because of the cultural shift that I allowed myself to be drawn along by due to lack of any firmer ground. The firmer ground is a firm family structure based in the word of God. Without that we are all like leaves blowing in the breeze – and the winds of cultural doctrine are blowing harder than ever.

I’ll leave you with this amazing video from Stefan Molyneux – this is his best so far in my view, and pretty much sums up the lives of a lot of women in my age group who believed the lie – who were perhaps as this lady, the product of dysfunctional families, or perhaps just convinced by what they saw in the media that everything their parents tried to instill in them was just ‘square’ and are now broken. Broken as I was broken. Broken by mistakes made with men. It’s salutary, and this recording should be required listening for every unmarried woman.

The survival of our race depends on us changing our views, denying the media the chance to influence us in what we believe and in how we act. It’s a time, more than ever, for back-to-basics biblical theology as the foundation of everything we do each day.

God Bless you


I hate to be a stickler

..and I’m no apologist for the evils of Islam for sure. However, it cannot escape any Law loving follower of YHWH that this chart is partially inaccurate. Let’s take a look, and then go line by line:


Now I’m going to go line by line asking “Is it in the law?”:

Mandate for world political domination – nope, the Law is for the chosen people

Church and state must be one – nope

Religious text as political constitution – preferably, but certainly it IS today in Israel, where the prefered law would be the Talmud

Full body of political, not just moral, law – preferably

Death penalty for leaving religion – nope

Death penalty for criticizing religion or founder – nope, but yes for blasphemy: “Leviticus 24:16 says, “Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.” So, yes, the Mosaic Law did require the death penalty for those who blasphemed the name of God.” (source)

Women treated as inferiors – yes in so far as being a Patriarchal system

Dual standard for believers and non-believers – yes – usury could be exacted from foreigners, not brothers

Mandated tax on non-believers – nope

Mandate for terror as tactic for expansion – not in the Law, but yes, if you count the destruction of Jericho as an example from the Old Testament. In fact Rahab knew of their previous attacks and that their God had given them the land. She was in awe of their God because she had heard this.

Lying sanctioned as “moral” – nope, except in the Talmud

Maiming, torture, beheading or stoning as part of practice – stoning and maiming, yes, although not practiced today – Yeshua taught us to apply the Law with mercy.

Invalidation of other religions – yes, absolutely, because every other god is a demon god, and not YHWH.

Destroys other religions’ houses of worship – yes, we are CALLED to do exactly what ISIS has done, and destroy their temples and groves and places of worship, we just don’t.

Force and violence against non-believers – nope

Churches promote political agendas – nope, but certainly the law was to be taught in the churches – Yeshua commanded us to do just that.

Religious leaders can order adherents to war – yes, on God’s command this happened a lot in the Old Testament. It doesn’t happen today.

Adherents are part of a de-facto political nation regardless of geographical location or political boundaries – kind of, yes.We are called to keep ourselves separate, no matter where we are, and to keep God’s Law. A people peculiar to our God.

Now you might think I’m shooting myself in the foot writing this, but I just want you to see that indeed the biblical law is very strict and very strong. It isn’t like sharia, because Yeshua came to show us how to apply it – with MERCY, allowing those who had sinned to repent and ‘Go and sin no more.’ But God was always clear that we were to put sin away from among us – we were not to tolerate sin, because sin spreads much quicker than goodness does!

I’m sorry also if this seems uncomfortable to you, I just want to present the facts here as best I know them.

There is, however a huge difference between the plans and wants of adherents of Christianity/Judaism today and Islam – the Law doesn’t allow for expansionist forced conversion. It doesn’t allow adherents to rape women and men. It doesn’t allow for lots of what we are seeing Islamists doing. Islam is a carnal religion.

But we must be clear, if we love the Law, that it is what God wanted for us – even though we do not, and cannot apply it (nor do we seek to) today. Our obedience to God’s Law is a sign of covenant between us and Him – it sets us apart. It is not, and never will, take away  other’s free will, even though their free will may result in judgement coming down on our nations.

I feel this is an important post – that we must see in that chart that what God truly stands for, and what He requires us to stand for is NOT the way our faith is taught or practised (nor is Judaism). In other words the Jews and us Christians are in open rebellion against God’s Law.

God Bless you