Dr Mike Yeadon on the coming democide – it’s up to you to stop it!


Please watch it!

God Bless you


Are the vaxxinated a danger to the unvaxxinated? It seems they are

I contacted the lovely Jackson Snyder to share my concerns over recent reports of people developing bruising, clots etc after being around those who have received the vaxxine. Beware – this is serious. We don’t know the effects, but we do know that “they” wish to harm us.

Please share far and wide.

God Bless you


Dr Vernon Coleman’s emotional response to the democide of his generation

This is a must watch and must share video. Here the “old man in a chair”, as he calls himself, talks about the vast deaths after vaccination which the government is calling a coincidence. Dr Coleman knows that’s not true, and knows the government is killing off his generation like a scythe cuts down the grass.

Boris Johnson and his murderous co-religionists in their cult of death and destruction will face the judgement seat of Yeshua one day. We will all face judgement – are you ready for that, because this government wants to send you to your death today, and if not today tomorrow.

A little incentive for this democide (just to clarify for those who don’t know, genocide is based on race, democide is mass slaughter by your government):

And one last thing before I finish. Boris Johnson is anti-Christ – anti-God in his views, and in his actions.

This is a quote from an article he wrote a few years ago: [emphasis added]

“As for motherhood — the fertility of the human race — we are getting to the point where you simply can’t discuss it, and we are thereby refusing to say anything sensible about the biggest single challenge facing the Earth; and no, whatever it may now be conventional to say, that single biggest challenge is not global warming. That is a secondary challenge. The primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself. Depending on how fast you read, the population of the planet is growing with every word that skitters beneath your eyeball. There are more than 211,000 people being added every day, and a population the size of Germany every year.”

“There was a time, in the 1960s and 1970s, when people such as my father, Stanley, were becoming interested in demography, and the UN would hold giant conferences on the subject, and it was perfectly respectable to talk about saving the planet by reducing the growth in the number of human beings. But over the years, the argument changed, and certain words became taboo, and certain concepts became forbidden, and we have reached the stage where the very discussion of overall human fertility — global motherhood — has become more or less banned.”

You can read his words here: Link

From his writings, it seems that Stanley Johnson is a eugenicist, and presumably his son has taken after him. Reducing global population is something Johnson and his murderous co-religionists want – and so that begs the question why the covid-19 response was aimed at “saving lives” – well clearly we know it wasn’t. It was aimed at killing as many as possible, plunging whole families into poverty and dependence, and creating a perfect seedbed for famine and slavery.

Johnson has blood on his hands. Look him in the eyes and hiss!

“Because of the wrath of the LORD She shall not be inhabited, But she shall be wholly desolate. Everyone who goes by Babylon shall be horrified And hiss at all her plagues.”

Jeremiah 50:13 NKJV

If you are in Britain, and you have not repented of all your sins and got yourself right with the Most High God, and if you still willfully walk in the statutes of men and NOT in the statutes of YHWH, then get ready, because His hand will NOT be upon the lawless to uphold you.


Is the new mRNA vaccine safe?

Define the word “safe” please.

Safe as in you don’t die or have a serious, debilitating reaction to it? Safe as in you take it and nothing happens at all? How do you define safe?


Does that sound safe? Being infertile?


There are dozens of other examples at this link – all anecdotal, mostly first hand accounts.

But it’s safe for seniors, right?


Is it safe for 30 year olds?


Is it safe for anyone?

The son of the lady above wrote:


And below is what the FDA says – from their own website:


Finally let’s consider the safety of being genetically altered:

In those days men will seek death and will not find it; they will desire to die, and death will flee from them.

Revelation 9:6 NKJV

Wanting to make you in their own image, scientists think that genetically altering you is a good thing. That’s exactly what this vaccine does, and if you don’t believe me, read their own words: https://www.pfizer.co.uk/behind-science-what-mrna-vaccine

I think it’s terrifying. I would honestly steer clear of the vaccinated because of this.

The important question is: “Does God want you to take this vaccine?”

Well, you can have His mark, or you can have the Mark of the Beast. That’s most likely where we are now. If you trust in Him you will walk in faith. If you trust in the scientists, you will be at their mercy.

I pray you will choose rightly.


Just in case you thought your organs weren’t worth protecting…

I’ve heard the argument that it’s not worth making the effort (effort???) to opt out of organ donation now, because if you’re old they won’t want your organs – believe me, murdering the elderly is right up there on the elite’s to do list, and they’re working on ways to make your old “unviable” organs viable again for transplantation right now. The following is from the Daily Mail (link at the end of the quote). My comments are added in bold.

Despite the lack of organs available for patients on transplant waitlists, organs from older, deceased donors are frequently thrown away. (No such thing as a deceased donor unless it’s for non vital organs. This kind of “deceased” is a made up notion that neither you nor Joe Bloggs in the street would think of as “death”)

But a new study suggests organs from elderly donors can be ‘rejuvenated’ by making them ‘younger.’

Researchers say anti-aging drugs can ‘turn back the clock’ on hearts, livers, kidneys and lungs by getting rid of cells that are linked to organ rejection in transplant patients. […]

‘Older organs are available and have the potential to contribute to mitigating the current demand for organ transplantation,’ said corresponding author Dr Stefan Tullius, chief of the Division of Transplant Surgery at the Brigham.

‘If we can utilize older organs in a safe way with outcomes that are comparable, we will take a substantial step forward for helping patients.’  […]

But, in new research published in the journal Nature Communications, the team demonstrated the effect of a class of drugs called senolytics, which target and eliminate old cells.   

As organs age, a group of cells called senescent cells tend to accumulate. Because they no longer divide like younger cells do, the body doesn’t go about destroying them.

What’s more, senescent cells release cell-free mitochondrial DNA (mt-DNA), which is recognized by the immune system and activates an inflammatory reaction.

Studies in the past have linked this process to organ rejection. 

But using senolytic drugs will force senescent cells back into a regular cycle so they can split and the body will get rid of them.

The researchers tested this theory in old mice with a combination of the senolytic drugs dasatinib and quercetin. […]

He hopes the drugs organs can be effectively with senolytic drugs after they are harvested from a donor.

‘We have not yet tested the effects clinically, but we are well prepared to take the next step toward clinical application by using a perfusion device to flow senolytic drugs over organs and measure whether or not there are improvements in levels of senescent cells,’ he said. (Link)

So here we have the elderly being used as spare parts – you will note that the drugs used to reverse the signs of ageing are not being given to LIVING patients to help them live. The drugs used (including the supplement quercetin, which you can buy and take for yourself) are being used on living mice in the experiment, and they are planning to try to perfuse harvested organs with them in order to get this benefit pre-transplant. How long before they decide to just keep the patient on life support and give them the drugs to make the organs healthier prior to harvest? They are a bunch of murderous quacks, so nothing would surprise me. All it takes is an “ethicist” who doesn’t have any moral qualms, like perhaps this lady, and anything is possible?

As a quick final note, I’ll add here that the elderly – talking to, listening to and recognising the wisdom of the elderly, is one of the things the elites want to banish from our society. They have done everything they can to harm as many old people as possible through this Covid nonsense. How can you have a “Year Zero” approach to changing society if the elderly can still be heard, and their wisdom and experience listened to? This talk of a Great Reset – it’s not a reset, people, it’s the great leap forward, and will cause just as many deaths, if not more. These communist ideologies require us to jettison our past, our history and the elderly are the bearers of that knowledge and understanding. Without them, we have the child soldiers of the Khmer Rouge.

I pray I’m wrong, but history repeats, and the devilish communist ideology continues to fascinate the ungodly in their hopes to take as many people as possible to hell with them.

If you are in the UK and you’re ready to opt out, here’s the link – you are not the property of the state! Protect your organs. https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/register-your-decision/refuse-to-donate/

May God Bless you


Is the organ theft scandal in China worse than our own?

Whatever you do, never accuse your own government, your own people, of crimes against humanity. We (We) aren’t like that – we are civilised. It is they who do such terrible things – and in this case it’s true, the Chinese have and are committing atrocities against a vulnerable minority amongst their own people. (Link)

total deception

However, taking the living and killing them by removing their organs is the universal truth of organ “donation” in every country of the world – that part our press refuses to admit.

We in the “civilised” West assume that as we consent (or in our case, don’t opt out – an opt out system will be beginning sometime this Spring in England) that somehow we are being told the truth.

There is no doubt that we can think of few more evil crimes than taking a perfectly healthy person and killing them for their organs. The only difference between China doing this evil thing and our own system, however, is the veil of lies surrounding “brain death” and “cardiac death” which the medical profession use to determine which, admittedly not that healthy, people it’s going to vivisect for their organs.

Our organ donors are in fact the most vulnerable in society. They are not herded at the point of a gun barrel to be killed. They are laying in a hospital bed with a brain injury which may or may not heal. Some even tell, after recovery from their injury, how they heard the doctors discussing their suitablility to be used as organ donors.

“Don’t cut me open — don’t hurt me! Let me wake up!.” While doctors hovered over her bed… discussing organ donation, Christina Nichole could hear every word they said – and their conversation terrified her.

Christina Nichole suffered severe hypoglycemia (her blood sugar levels dropped) on July 15, 2004 after taking the medication Zyprexa and she lapsed in and out of coma. Doctors transferred her to Sacred Heart Medical Center, Spokane WA and placed her on life support in Neuro ICU. Doctors could only theorise as to what caused her condition. Then Christina was paralysed with powerful drugs to prevent her hyperventilating.

After only six days, Dr. Bender, Head Neurologist for Christina during her coma, and Dr Palukuru reported that she had “severe global brain injury” and, diagnosed her as “brain dead” with no chance of recovery. They recommended “reduction in the level of care” and no further tests.

Christina was paralysed and could not move or cry out or respond in any way to any communication, but her mother refused to give up on her and knew that her daughter was actually still alive. “I knew she was still in there and I started working to prove that”, Judy Thornsberry told the South Beach Bulletin. But it wasn’t easy to convince doctors, who started pressuring Christina’s parents to donate her organs. The family reports that:

It was clear that they wanted to kill her and harvest whatever they could from her body because they harassed us for 10 days to sign papers to allow them to do that. Why did they want her dead? Government insurance? Body parts on the market? We want answers and no one wants to answer the questions.

Read the rest of that article here: Link

Is there any difference, then, between different ways of committing medical murder? Does it make it better that we don’t choose to single out a vulnerable minority for this treatment? But as I’ve just explained, we do…

God Bless you


In around 2020 a severe pneumonia-like illness will spread throughout the globe…

…according to one image posted the other day on Snippits and Slappits blog. I was curious – where could this have come from and was this some kind of prophecy or was it a plan – an elite plan…? This is the image I saw, and saved:


So I did a bit of investigation. I went to books.google.co.uk and typed in the first line there (the title of this piece). Nothing came up until I put it into quotes. Then this came up:

End of Days

A link for you if you want to read it yourself.

The book it comes from is called End of Days and was written by Sylvia Browne. Was she onto something?

sylvia browne 4

Well, as we will see, she is a psychic – and the other predictions on those pages clearly show that she was way out on almost everything else she said.

For example:

Sylvia Browne

Um, nope to all of those.

sylvia browne 2

The influx of “advanced spirits” is clearly not the third world influx we are currently seeing, because they have brought crime to our doorsteps – goodness, there are now carjackings in Birmingham in the UK.

sylvia browne 3

Again, no – and I have selected only those things which should have come to pass already, and over less than one chapter of her book.

So if you are thinking this is an important prediction, the answer is that Sylvia was spot on in one out of many predictions. She was a false prophet. If you are expecting all these things to have been, or still to come true, you have been misled.

But finally, just how seriously should we be taking this Coronavirus. Well, I will say “run from the cure” as far as this goes. Coronaviruses are common colds – what are they doing to make this so fatal? Is it the HIV meds they are using to treat it? It’s NOT a retrovirus!


Pray for the covering hand of our precious God, and for discernment – yes there will be predictions and doom mongering, and some will be correct, but we know what to think about false prophets:

Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. Matt 7:15 ESV

Don’t be fooled – stick close to God – the real God, the God of the bible.



The medical profession – literally blowing smoke up your *rse

Forgive me for the language, but it’s true. Tobacco smoke enemas were a thing – in all seriousness.


You can read the rest of the weird and wonderful “treatments” offered by the quacks of their day here: Link

The title of that article leaves a lot to be desired, however, if you know the facts. They titled it “21 Bizarre Medical Practices Used In The Past That Will Make You Appreciate Modern Medicine”. Appreciating modern medicine is an act of ignorance – as we shall see, and the reasons why we should avoid modern medicine like the plague are many – from dodgy procedures to dangerous medicines to medical murder for organs – the medical profession today is seen only as science, but it is NOT science in most cases.

As this excellent article points out, and I quote: (emphasis added)

There is no question that modern medical practices are remarkable, often effective and occasionally miraculous.

But there is a wrinkle in our confidence. We believe that the vast majority of what physicians do is backed by solid science. Their diagnostic and treatment decisions must reflect the latest and best research. Their clinical judgment must certainly be well beyond any reasonable doubt. To seriously question these assumptions would seem jaundiced and cynical.

But we must question them because these beliefs are based more on faith than on facts for at least three reasons, each of which we will explore in detail in this section. Only a fraction of what physicians do is based on solid evidence from Grade-A randomized, controlled trials; the rest is based instead on weak or no evidence and on subjective judgment. When scientific consensus exists on which clinical practices work effectively, physicians only sporadically follow that evidence correctly. […]

We know, for example, that when a patient goes to his primary-care physician with a very common problem like lower back pain, the physician will deliver the right treatment with real clinical benefit about half of the time. […]

We could accurately say, “Half of what physicians do is wrong,” or “Less than 20 percent of what physicians do has solid research to support it.” Although these claims sound absurd, they are solidly supported by research that is largely agreed upon by experts. Yet these claims are rarely discussed publicly.

So from blowing smoke up people’s arses, to drugging them with cocaine or mercury, this quackery continues to this day.

God Bless you


A dystopian nightmare

Wouldn’t it be awful if the state was murdering people for their organs and then rejecting those organs as being too “unhealthy” to be transplanted? What a story! What kind of futuristic Brave New World-like fiction volume would it have to come from?

Today, in the news.

This is sickening.

government sanctioned murder.jpg


This interesting set of statistics from the article bears a little closer scrutiny: I quote

During 2018-2019, 408 patients died while on the transplant waiting list or within one year of being removed from it, according to NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). 

The overall number of transplants fell by two per cent last year, from 5,104 to 4,990, while more people were added to the list.  

Of all transplants, 3,951 were from deceased donors, 87 fewer than 2017/2018 when there were 4,038.

According to another part of the article “Every person is able to donate nine organs in theory.” This means that according to the statistics above that if every “donor” (read murder victim) supplied the full 9 organs, then 439 people were killed to provide the organs for the transplants in 2018-19 (3,951 transplants from “deceased” donors – the lie carefully repeated to cover up the crime). That’s a lot of blood on the hands of people who are supposedly there to “first do no harm” (according to the pagan Hippocratic Oath).

The state is killing the innocent, and then complaing that the organs aren’t good enough quality – what a sick world we live in in 2019. Shame on them all!