Getting past the Daily Mail censors to reveal the truth about organ donation

I have found one of the Daily Mail’s censored words! I have! It’s the word “abomination”, isn’t that interesting?

After two attempts last night to share this short comment on this article, I succeeded this morning when I added dots into the word abomination:

Are you aware that organs come from living people, and are not taken after death as the ordinary person understands it? If so you will understand that people should never be used in this way. As for animals, this is an absolute

Why is this important? Because organ donation is an important topic on this blog, and as you’ll see from the following top three comments, most Daily Mail readers would rather humans be vivisected than animals:

dm comments 3.jpg

So taking a pig’s heart is terrible evil and exploitation, yeah? Here’s the comment I replied to, which is currently the seventh of the top ten:

dm comment

These people really do think it’s cruel to take an animals organ, but not to take a human one.They probably believe that the animal will be killed for the organ but that human organs are taken “after death”. This is part of the sick trick our satanic rulers have played on us.

The bit which the DM clearly didn’t like is that taking that organ (it wouldn’t matter which animal it came from, being a pig is just the most “obviously” bad) and putting it inside a human, made in the image of God is an ABOMINATION!

These fools revere animals above humans!

We are not to love our lives “to the death”

“and they did overcome him because of the blood of the Lamb, and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life — unto death;” Revelation 11:12 [YLT]

Taking an organ from another human to prolong another human life is to deny the humanity of the “donor” (not a donor because they have not given informed consent to be vivisected for their organs – vivisected means to be cut open alive, often without anaesthetic). It is theft: state sanctioned murder. To put an animal part into a human, a pig’s heart of all things, is to fly in the face of God and say that human life is worth more than God’s Will!

Doctors cannot deliver you out of the hand of God! God tells us who He is:

“See now that I am He; there is no God besides Me. I bring death and I give life; I wound and I heal, and there is no one who can deliver from My hand.” Deuteronomy 32:39 [KJV]

I’ll end with sharing Hannah’s prayer from the book of Samuel. First the context. In Chapter 1 we see Hannah pray for a child, and she promises this child to God. God grants her wish, and opens her womb. At the end of Chapter 1 we read: [emphasis added]

24 And when she had weaned him, she took him up with her, with three bullocks, and one ephah of flour, and a bottle of wine, and brought him unto the house of the Lord in Shiloh: and the child was young.

25 And they slew a bullock, and brought the child to Eli.

26 And she said, Oh my lord, as thy soul liveth, my lord, I am the woman that stood by thee here, praying unto the Lord.

27 For this child I prayed; and the Lord hath given me my petition which I asked of him:

28 Therefore also I have lent him to the Lord; as long as he liveth he shall be lent to the Lord. And he worshipped the Lord there. [KJV]

In chapter two we read her prayer: [emphasis added]

1 And Hannah prayed, and said, My heart rejoiceth in the Lord, mine horn is exalted in the Lord: my mouth is enlarged over mine enemies; because I rejoice in thy salvation.

2 There is none holy as the Lord: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.

3 Talk no more so exceeding proudly; let not arrogancy come out of your mouth: for the Lord is a God of knowledge, and by him actions are weighed.

4 The bows of the mighty men are broken, and they that stumbled are girded with strength.

5 They that were full have hired out themselves for bread; and they that were hungry ceased: so that the barren hath born seven; and she that hath many children is waxed feeble.

6 The Lord killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.

7 The Lord maketh poor, and maketh rich: he bringeth low, and lifteth up.

8 He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s, and he hath set the world upon them.

9 He will keep the feet of his saints, and the wicked shall be silent in darkness; for by strength shall no man prevail.

10 The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces; out of heaven shall he thunder upon them: the Lord shall judge the ends of the earth; and he shall give strength unto his king, and exalt the horn of his anointed.

I love her prayer because she acknowledges the might and power of God.

When we turn to medical science, and in this case it’s “abomination science”, we are denying the might and power of God! We are saying that without medical intervention this person will die, as if we should not turn to God first and see what He says!

Here are some previous relevant posts for you to read:

Organ donation scandal – the truth about organ donation – MUST READ MUST SHARE

The Truth About Organ Donation: 13 y.o. boy wakes up as doctors prepare to harvest his organs

Go to God, or ask the devil?

Medical word-magic

May the fear of God bring you into all wisdom.



Right, I’m about to go off on a rant – Organ donation

I saw this video today. Watch it please (don’t let children hear it – the language is rather bad).

Coleman Sweeney – the world’s biggest asshole, eh?

No, I think the bigger assholes are the ones who LIE to the public that VIVISECTING this guy for PARTS is OK at all!

Again we come back to the issue of informed CONSENT. No one has ever given informed consent to be an organ donor – to be vivisected. No one would be an organ donor if that was known.

So Coleman Sweeney wasn’t just an asshole, he was an asshole who got to be cut up on an operating table whilst still alive. I wouldn’t wish that on anyone. Not on anyone.

Would you?

God Bless you


The 6% – Medical researcher says ‘let’s take organs from euthanasia patients while they’re still alive!’

This is the ULTIMATE SICKNESS – it comes from shifting sands morality – moral relativism, which with each generation leads to deeper and deeper levels of savagery. Well this is peak savagery. I quote (Link) [my emphasis added, and my comments in square brackets]

Doctors should have the right to take organs from patients who want to die so they can be used in transplant surgery, a prominent medical researcher has suggested.

Those who want to be killed should be sedated [N.B. NOT ANAESTHETISED] in hospital then allowed to die after the removal of their vital organs, according to the proposal published by a British-based medical ethics journal. [allowed to die AFTER their organs are removed? Removing their organs will kill them!]

Using organs for transplant surgery from patients who have been helped to die is allowed in Belgium and Holland, the European countries where euthanasia is legal.

But ‘dead donor’ rules mean there must be a gap between the death of the patient and the removal of organs, with the delay meaning their quality may decline. [Nonsense – all organ donors are only ‘tested’ to see if they fulfill faulty criteria – brain death or cardiac death, they are never dead until their organs are removed]

However an article in the Journal of Medical Ethics yesterday advocated ‘heart-beating organ donation euthanasia’. This would involve an operation in which organs would be taken from still-living patients who have given permission.

It would allow those who wish to die to donate their organs while improving the chances of successful transplants, the article said.

The proposal by Jan Bollen, a researcher in Holland, drew condemnation from opponents of euthanasia and assisted suicide in Britain, where assisted dying remains illegal following an overwhelming vote against by MPs last year.

I am speechless – if you have seen anything about euthanasia in Holland, you know this is now happening to perfectly physically healthy people who are depressed. They are not interested in helping people with these problems, and goodness they certainly won’t go near a church with their problems, they go to a doctor and end up being USED like this? This is SICK! I am glad to say that Fiona Bruce, a UK MP has spoken out against this, citing serious ethical concerns. You can read her comments in the article linked above.

This is appalling, but still they are testing the waters – giving you step by step pointers until the next generation wonder why we held off so long from this sickness.

Please pray for Jan Bollen – this is an individual who has no true moral compass, and only God can preserve his or her soul from eternal separation from God.

If you haven’t come across the 6% before, read these articles – this is psychopathy dressed up as pragmatism.

The six percent – psychopaths in our midst

The 6% – putting it into perspective

The 6% – Animal cruelty

If you haven’t read my previous articles about organ donation, click the links below

Organ donation scandal – the truth about organ donation – MUST READ MUST SHARE

Organ donation and the myth of ‘informed consent’

Talking to my dear friend about organ donation

UK Transplant surgeon suggests babies with defects could be born for their organs

God Bless you


More on organ donation – letters sent to the Bishop of Carlisle and the charity FleshandBlood

I need to share this, because it’s important to say that there is more to speaking about the evils of organ donation than just fretting here – I really do hope to make a difference to those who cannot speak out, and I am hoping that a letter I have sent today to The Rt Revd James Newcome, the Bishop of Carlisle, will lead to a change of heart within the church on the subject of organ donation. I say this because a big drive has begun to encourage Christians to make ‘sacrificial offerings’ in becoming organ donors. This from the Daily Mail: (Link)

“Christians will be urged to give blood and donate organs under a motion to go before the Church of England’s general synod.

The move is backed by James Newcome, the Bishop of Carlisle, who wants blood and organ donation to be part of the ‘sacrificial offerings’ which are a Christian duty.

His call comes after the number of organ donors fell for the first time in 11 years and the NHS says it needs more than 200,000 new blood donors to meet current demand.

A motion is to go before the general synod, the highest governing body of the Church of England, which started yesterday.

It is backed by fleshandblood, a group set up to encourage organ and blood donation among Christians.

In a message to the group, Bishop Newcome said the campaign is based on the Christian concept of a ‘sacrificial offering’.

He said: ‘That “sacrificial offering” is usually associated with time, money and gifts. But it applies just as much to the blood that flows in our veins and the organs that are such an intrinsic part of our bodies.

‘Whether it’s the regular donation of blood or registration to become an organ donor, being willing to give ourselves in this way is a significant aspect of our ‘stewardship’ of what we have received.”

I have also written to FleshandBlood, the charity involved, and I will let you know what responses I receive.

God Bless you


For previous articles on this subject, read:

Organ donation scandal – the truth about organ donation – MUST READ MUST SHARE

Organ donation and the myth of ‘informed consent’

Organ donation and the myth of ‘informed consent’

No-one has EVER given informed consent to be an organ donor. I say this because no-one has ever been informed that they won’t be dead when their organs are removed. If you were to ask people if they should have a general anaesthetic when they donate their organs, they would look at you as if you were mad. ‘Why would I need that?’ they’d ask. ‘I’ll be DEAD!’

Err, no, you won’t be. Dead in the sense of fulfilling one VERY narrow criteria of brain death – flat brainwaves – and a few tests for reactions. The problem is that the reactions of those whose organs are removed with only a paralysing drug to stop them lashing out, or jerking, are consistent with those who have reported being awake and able to feel pain during surgery.

I kid you not.

This is something NONE of us want to think about. We really don’t. We can’t imagine having an operation and being able to feel every cut and hear what the surgeons are saying. I don’t even want your mind to go there.

What we must do is put a stop to organ donation from living donors. Say no, come off the register and TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY.

Kidneys, corneas and heart valves CAN be taken from truly dead people, and these things are viable for a period of time after death allowing their removal without life-support.

Everything else – liver, lungs and heart for example – have to come from LIVING patients.

The public are in utter ignorance of the facts of organ donation, and I believe only a major class action lawsuit by families of loved ones who were in essence killed for their organs, will change the tide and make individual doctors, hospitals and organisations like the NHS stand up and take notice.

I note this quote from Exposing Modern Mugwumps, in relation sot SB 128, which provides for physician assisted suicide:

“Pro Life groups are alerting each other to the fact that we are receiving more and more calls from frantic family members whose loved one, in hospital, is being pressured to use assisted suicide and donate their organs to transplant teams.” (Link)

Again I say, this must be STOPPED!

Here I’ll leave you with a quote from a very good article showing just how little the public really understands about organ donation and brain-death.

“Brain death and the dead donor rule (patients may not be killed through organ retrieval) are clinically and legally accepted in most countries as prerequisites for organ removal. Yet, many adults are unaware of, misinformed about, or hold beliefs that are not in line with official definitions of brain death.

In a telephone survey of 1,351 adult residents of Ohio, in the United States, conducted by Dr. Laura Siminoff, PhD, and her colleagues, participants were asked to assess whether the patient in each one of three hypothetical scenarios (brain dead, in a coma, in a persistent vegetative state [PVS]) was dead and whether they would be willing to donate that patient’s organs.

Two-thirds of participants (66%) did not know that someone who was brain dead is considered to be legally dead and nearly 60 percent mistakenly thought that the respirator is stopped before, rather than after, organs are taken.

The majority (86 percent) identified the brain dead patient in the first scenario as dead, 57 percent identified the patient in a coma as dead, and 34 percent identified the patient in a PVS as dead. Most who said that the patient was alive were not willing to donate that patient’s organs.

Although the data in the study by Siminoff, Burant, and Youngner of public attitudes toward “brain death” and organ donation suggest that many seem to view “brain death” as “as good as dead” rather than “dead” (calling the dead donor rule into question), the study shows that understanding an individual’s definition of death is neither a straightforward task nor a good predictor of views about donation. 1″ Link

God Bless you