Rape is sex without consent.

I knew this day would come. I kept my mouth shut hoping that it would not. Hoping that if I didn’t say anything, it would just not come to be, but I watched, and I knew that this was likely.

Then I saw this headline today, and I knew that day had come. In fact it had come last year when the article was first published. Damnit!

trans 1.jpg

And of course you all know where this leads. Firstly this is homosexual rape – no one has the right to have sex with you under a fake identity (and especially when that fake identity would cause you to commit a mortal sin in the eyes of God). This is non consensual sex – this is rape. Tragically this also leads to this:

vile sin.jpg

This trans person, who clearly expects all the tolerance and understanding in the world, cannot see how someone might feel raped if they had unwittingly had homosexual sex???? It’s rape, plain and simple – it’s a total misrepresentation of who a person is.

If you don’t know what “cis” gendered is, by the way, it means natural (as God intended). Yes, they’re even trying to label and marginalise us now!

So whilst I do not condone violence in any shape or form, I do believe that this is a vile sin against a person and rape indeed if the gender has been changed (because your birth sex and chromosomes can NEVER be changed!).

The writer goes on:

“Thus, not being attracted to trans people is deeply transphobic. The entire notion that someone isn’t attracted to a group of very physically diverse group of people because they are trans is built on fear and disgust of trans people. None of this means it is transphobic to not be attracted to individual trans people. Nor is it transphobic to not be attracted to specific genitals. But it is transphobic to claim to not be attracted to all trans, people. For example, there is a difference between saying you won’t go out with someone for having a penis and saying you won’t go out with someone because they’re trans.

So when a cis person argues that a trans person has an obligation to come out to someone before dating them, they are saying trans people have an obligation to accommodate their transphobia. Plus, claiming that trans people are obligated to come out reinforces the idea that not being attracted to trans people is reasonable. But as I’ve pointed out, not being attracted to trans people supports the idea that transness is disgusting which is the basis for transphobic oppression.”

[…] The one scenario in which I would say a trans person should disclose their trans status is if they are going to have sex with someone and are unsure if their partner is attracted to whatever genitals they may have. In that case, I think it’s courteous for a trans person to come out to avoid any awkwardness during sex. But even then, a trans person isn’t “lying” if they don’t come out and their partner is certainly not being “raped.” [Really?!]

It is easy to look at the story of Jennifer Laude and claim that her death was due to the actions of one bigot. But it’s more complicated than that. Pemberton was the product of a society that told him that disgust towards trans people was reasonable and natural. So when he found out that he accidentally slept with a trans woman, he killed her. (Link)

First of all the writer makes the mistake of thinking that attraction is the basis for a sexual relationship. Attraction is one basis, but the primary basis is CONSENT! You do not have that persons consent to have homosexual sex with them! Tell me how would a lesbian feel if they found out they’s just had sex with a trans woman? Might they say this was wrong and they didn’t consent to have sex with someone who is genetically MALE!?

The rights of the trans person to privacy DO NOT and can NEVER trump the rights of their partner to CONSENT to a homosexual act – which is what this is (or a heterosexual encounter, as described above).

I warn you now that the day will come when Trans people will demand this right mooted in the article – they will demand the right to not reveal who they are. And sadly this will lead to more terrible crimes of violence, and worse – people will be condemned by God for the sin of homosexuality which is a sin unto death.

Maranatha!

God Bless you

Lis

A brief explanation of how Europe will be defeated – Cultural Marxism

God Bless you

Lis

Homosexuality – tolerance leads to suffering

Homosexuals make up just 3% of the population – yet they have overturned God’s Law. I do not hate gay people – I once years ago had four gay men as my very best friends – and they were great fun to be around, however, I can tell you from experience that they encourage promiscuity; they have a resentful spirit towards many in society. They seek to undermine the common bonds of our tradtitional way of living as a way to justify and gain credibility for their own actions – and I’m talking about the WORLD’s way of living, say twenty years ago, not the biblical way of  living.

My message to you today is that we must be aware that the very same spirit which is in these homosexuals is now in the heterosexual community at large. Sodomy is now practiced by more straight people in the world than gay. Sodom is truly upon us, and it is not exclusive to the gay community by any stretch of the imagination.

We need to be aware, as few are, that America and other western nations who allow gay marriage are only heaping God’s judgement on themselves – but they transgressed His Laws long ago. In the UK, we legalised homosexuality and abortion in the same year – 1967. The US was slower to legalise this, but you have been under judgement a long time. The judgement is coming to fruition now, because you are being made to reap what you have sown. You sowed the seeds of homosexual marriage when you legalised homosexuality. Now that you have legalised homosexual marriage, you are heading for the outlawing of your own churches. You stood by and allowed this – all in the name of tolerance and ‘love’.

Tolerance leads to suffering. Let’s do a word look up in the dictionary:

Tolerance: n. early 15c., “endurance, fortitude,” from Old French tolerance (14c.), from Latin tolerantia “endurance,” from tolerans, present participle of tolerare “to bear, endure, tolerate” (see toleration ).

Suffer: v. early 13c., “to be made to undergo, endure” (pain, death, punishment, judgment, grief), from Anglo-French suffrir, Old French sufrir, from Vulgar Latin *sufferire, variant of Latin sufferre “to bear, undergo, endure, carry or put under,” from sub “up, under” (see sub- ) + ferre “to carry” (see infer ).

We have chosen to tolerate – endure the actions of others who are breaking God’s Laws. Now we are suffering – the church is now forced by the majority viewpoint and is ‘made to undergo, endure’ a society which is against God and His followers.

Aren’t we supposed to have compassion though? Let’s look at the original dictionary meaning of the word:

Compassion: n. mid-14c., from Old French compassion “sympathy, pity” (12c.), from Late Latin compassionem (nominative compassio) “sympathy,” noun of state from past participle stem of compati “to feel pity,” from com- “together” (see com- ) + pati “to suffer” (see passion ).

The homosexuals were suffering (made to undego, endure) their illegal status, and we developed compassion for them (to suffer together – feeling sympathy), and we then chose to force everyone to tolerate them (endure), and made homosexuality legal. We quite simply broke God’s Law. Little did we realise that they would take over our media, the movie and TV industries, and encourage ‘choice’ in everything, and every aspect of life. Now we are the ones who are suffering – we are made to undergo, endure. The churches are still full of compassion, and in the United States churches are changing their constitutions to allow for homosexual marriage in church. Next will be the destruction of our churches, as we are forced to assent to marry homosexuals in our churches – by LAW – the law of man, which has taken the place of the Law of God.

This UK same sex couple sued in 2013 for the ‘right’ to marry in their vilage church. Read the article here: Link I quote:

“It is a shame that we are forced to take Christians into a court to get them to recognize us. It upsets me because I want it so much—a big lavish ceremony, the whole works…” […] “As much as people are saying this [law] is a good thing, I am still not getting what I want.”

I can only assume that they didn’t win, but how much longer will this continue? The US is likely to fall first by the looks of things – then how much longer can any church stand against this crime against God!

Disobedience to God brings us to emotionality which has led us to abandon God’s Law because we are too kind, too tolerant, and now we are suffering!

God knew this would happen, which is why He made those laws in the first place. He knew the consequences, so that we wouldn’t have to. However, instead of simply obeying, we reasoned away His Laws – ignoring Yeshua’s clear instructions about keeping the Law. Just in case you missed my post on this, it’s here: Link

Now we are reaping.

The harvest must be counted all joy – according to Paul – but there is much suffering to come.

God Bless you

Lis