I could almost present this without comment – after all I’m fairly sure by now you know some of what I’m going to say about it, but I felt it was helpful to quote from the article because it’s just SO outrageous!
I recommend you go and watch the brief video of this woman being interviewed on the Daily Mail’s website here: Link
I’m going to quote from there [my emphasis added]:
Britain’s most pampered pooch is celebrating Christmas in the lap of luxury with 68 individually wrapped presents costing in excess of a £1,000. […]
Helena admits that Lola, who has her very own bank account and £100 monthly allowance from her husband Mark, will be getting more presents than her six-year-old son Harry because she ‘loves Lola more’.
‘This year, she’s definitely getting more gifts than Harry,’ she admitted. ‘I tried to hide that from Harry last year, but this time it’s so obvious because there’s so many.’
She added: ‘I do love my Lola more than Harry. You know, Lola never moans about homework, and she never complains about what’s for dinner.
‘She had her first snow yesterday, and I came in and realised I hadn’t taken any pictures of Harry – but had absolutely loads of Lola, and that’s what always happens.’ […]
‘I took a week off from work when Lola had her spaying operation, when Harry has a cold I’m just like, “Off you go then!”‘
Helena said: ‘My husband’s view is happy wife, happy life – he knows where he comes in the pecking order – it goes Lola, Harry, him! […]
Helena explained how she took Harry out of school to go to a special dog photographer so that they could have a family photo with Lola.
‘I would rather that Harry wasn’t able to spell “table” when he’s 20, than have a gap in the family photo,’ Helena reasoned.
Now it would be easy to say that this woman is some kind of freak – let’s be honest this is not the behaviour of someone who is very rational. A rational person doesn’t turn their dog into an idol, and I have never, personally, known anyone who treats their dog as being more important than a human member of the family. However, it would also be easy to say that of a person who claims (with no evidence beyond their own thoughts and feelings) that they are “otherkin” or of another gender. Yet now the state is demanding (with menaces) that we accept that this person is “natural” and that they are what they say they are no matter the fact that their chromosomes mean they are NOT a different sex (nor species!) than they were born.
Why make this comparison?
Because both the irrational transgenders and this woman are being pampered. Our culture is being parasitised by a media which promotes this kind of irrational and societally damaging behaviour. This woman should be absolutely ashamed of her thoughts regarding loving her dog more than her son. The very idea of uttering such a sentiment should be considered abhorrent in ANY decent and civilised society. Yet here she is being interviewed and written about in a national newspaper as some kind of benign oddity. Where are child protective services? I’ve heard of children being taken away from LOVING parents for a lot less than this child is enduring. Not only has his mother turned an unclean animal into some kind of idol, she has also abased the natural role of his own father to beneath himself!
To say that the father is lower on the pecking order than the son, who is lower than the dog, means that boundaries – boundaries designed by God to ensure that boys grow up to be men – have been destroyed, and with them, for this little boy, his sense of self, and how to relate to people. His teenage rebellion will probably be something to behold. Poor kid. She even admits he’ll probably need therapy when he’s older due to how she has treated the family dog.
Sadly this is what happens when women rule the home. Her husband should take a stand, leave and take the son away. She’ll, no-doubt, be upset for a while, but as long as she has her £100 a month for the dog, and the dog itself, perhaps she’ll quickly forget about her child.
This is a tragic case which reinforces the questions I’ve already raised about having unclean animals in the home. This dog is more than a tool to protect the home, she has become the centre of everything. Women, I will note, will often use a pet to rule the home. Making the plans they have (their “needs”) all about the pet is a good cover to completely undermine their husband’s role. Most men these days are very soft about pets – after all it is said that a man’s best friend is his dog. This ruse is an easy one to pull on a husband – “Oh honey I don’t think we should go out tonight, the dog always looks so miserable when we leave”, or “Oh honey, don’t bother me for sex tonight, poochie’s just got comfie on the bed.”
This is, quietly, the behaviour of a Jezebel. Women who put a pet before a child are unnatural!
Just to be absolutely clear for those reading this who don’t know the natural order, I’m going to actually state it here:
Father (head of the wife)
Wife (helpmeet to the husband – see Proverbs 31 for more details)
That’s it. There isn’t a place on the pecking order for pets.
Until we become obedient – truly submitting ourselves, both MEN and WOMEN to our proper roles we will not be able to raise a generation capable of putting right what the Left has done wrong since WWII. I say men too because the question of “which came first, the chicken or the egg” can also be asked in relation to Jezebel and Ahab. Which came first, her behaviour or his indifference to it? Men do need to stand – a weak man will often leave a woman no choice but to lead.
Sadly, in a Marxist “Utopia” this woman is a good example of someone who is “living her best life” (i.e. she’s displaying narcissistic behaviour).
And that is a sign of Jezebel at work.
God Bless you