From 2020, you’re just spare parts under May’s murderous regime

When we think of evil, we recall the pictures of the holocaust, or images of the killing fields. We might think of those awful pictures of a man with a gun to his head, waiting to be shot, his body swiftly thrown into a ready-dug trench. Perhaps we recall earlier histories of barbarity, including the Spanish inquisition, and the human sacrifice of the savage and ignorant Aztecs.

We wouldn’t think of our own time, we wouldn’t think of our current government, because we wouldn’t – couldn’t – surely believe that our leaders were involved in hoodwinking the British public to be vivisected (dissected alive) for their organs. But that is indeed exactly what they have done since the organ “donor” register was created. Now, the government has passed a law which sets the default to “donor” for all people. Most won’t make a fuss, or opt out, because they don’t know the truth. Read more: Link

The lies about organ donation are required. Just as a mother who wants to believe, as she aborts her child in a state-sanctioned sacrifice (a sacrifice to her own life, her wants and her plans) that the child inside her is just a “blob of cells”, some “matter” to be removed, and that it (not he or she) feels no pain, the lies of organ donation are vital for the process to be continued.

If you knew that organs came from living people, not dead bodies, you’d be horrified. But the government lies to you, just as the abortionist comforts with lies a mother who doesn’t want the responsibility of her child. The family of the person who is deemed “brain dead” don’t know that that person is alive (and that life support does not keep the heart beating). If they knew that the organs would be removed without anaesthetic, and that their loved one was not dead in any way that they, or you, or I, understand, they would say NO!

But the necessary lies are there – the lie that the NHS will test you to make sure you’re dead. The lie that the organs are taken “after death” without explaining that the criteria for “death” aren’t death at all – the necessary lies for the most heinous and evil acts of murder, by a murderous regime – a regime who would sacrifice you in an instant.

Life is precious, and sacred. Death is the enemy. From next year you will have to OPT out of being vivisected – murdered – for your precious organs. Make sure you do.

For more (horrifying) facts, visit organfacts.net

Lis

Advertisements

Tragic: Another man murdered for his organs – Bored Panda uses this for pro-donate propaganda

The family of Daniel Bassillo have recently shared their pride that their family member was vivisected for his organs, which are reputed to be helping other people. Their tragedy is now being used to further the cause of medical murder. Organ donation is firstly not a donation (because informed consent was not obtained), and secondly requires the victim to be alive when their organs are harvested – hence why it is medical murder.

I quote: (Link)

“We didn’t even hesitate when they asked us if we wanted to donate. I don’t even think we really had to talk about it,” Alexa told Bored Panda. “I pray that you don’t lose the most important person in your life but if you can at the very least take that and turn it into something good.. why wouldn’t you want to do that?” she added.

Why? Because if your brother had usable organs, he was still alive. Alive! He wasn’t dead when his organs were removed, and he may not even have been given an anaesthetic before he was cut open. Just horrifying!

The family showed online the letter they received, telling them how many people the doctors were able to help after they murdered her brother:

organs.jpg

I quote: (Link)

One cannot determine with certainty what organ donors feel, if anything, while being harvested. The logic of brain death goes like this: If the brain stem is dead, then the higher centers of the brain are also probably dead, and if the whole brain is 
dead, then everything beneath the brain stem is no longer relevant. Since in practice only the brain stem is routinely tested, the vast majority of the body, everything above the brain stem and everything below, no longer counts as human.

The reason for denying beating-heart cadavers anesthetic during the removal of their organs is hard to pin down. (Some experts say it is because anesthetic will harm the organs.) Nevertheless, administering anesthetics to BHCs during organ harvests is becoming more common in Europe, according to Robert Truog, professor of medical ethics, anesthesia, and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. Despite their strong opposition to brain death, Truog and Shewmon both refuse to acknowledge the possibility that some donors may be in severe pain during organ harvests, even though they acknowledge that some donors did exhibit reactions similar to inadequately anesthetized surgical patients who afterward reported pain and consciousness. Shewmon said the donor reactions were simply “bodily reactions to noxious stimuli.” I asked if an experiment could be designed to answer the question of pain in donors. He said no.

Truog did not even want to discuss the possibility of pain in the organ donor. But when I suggested experiments along the lines suggested by other anesthesiologists—when BHCs show pain reactions during a harvest, administer anesthetic to see if the reactions subside—he surprised me by saying he had already done this. He has used two different kinds of anesthetics that do not harm organs to quell symptoms such as high blood pressure or heart rate. “Just because the symptoms come down, though,” he added, “does not mean the patient is in pain. Pain is a subjective thing.” As with Shewmon, I asked Truog if an experiment wasn’t called for. He said there was no experiment that could answer the question of pain in the donor.

Would Daniel have lived if he’d been kept on life support? Would he have recovered? We’ll never know. But we do know that this poor man was killed for his organs – that his heart was beating independently when he was being harvested. We know that this barbaric practice is shrowded in secrecy and that most people are ignorant of the truth of what organ “donation” entails.

Always say no to organ donation – do not “donate” or accept organs from murdered people for yourself or a family member. This secretive practice in which linguistic confabulation and misdirection is used to obtain “consent” for the abhorrent human sacrifice of one living person for other living people can only be stopped if we share that knowledge far and wide.

Your organs will not be taken AFTER your death, and Daniel Basillo’s organs were not, either.

I pray that he felt no pain.

May the fear of God bring you into all wisdom.

Lis

 

Thor’s Hammer – now used in surgery?

Yes.

Now, let me begin by saying that we have ONE God! YHWH is His name, and He is worthy of ALL worship! His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ (Yeshua Messiah) came to show us the truth, to set the captives free and to show us how the Law of God is to be kept – this is His “light yoke” which keeps us on the straight and narrow. That light yoke is the Torah. Anything which belongs to any other faith, any other “god” is absolutely forbidden to us. We should not even utter their names (Exodus 23:13)! Our God is a jealous God! He is jealous over us and loves us and wants us to know Him and not give honour to the “pantheon” of paganism.

So that’s why I’m sharing this story, because instruments like Thor’s hammer – things which are made to honour this demon god – they are NOT for us! Yet as is so often the way, we are faced with the medical profession and their pharmakeia, their “witchcraft and sorcery”. This hammer, being used in orthopedic surgery (and for anyone who doubts that hammers are used in surgery, it’s for joint replacements where bones need to be broken, chiselled etc.) is going to be used on unconscious patients without their consent! I mean just WHY?!

Is it for the titillation of the surgeons? It can’t possibly be for efficacy, because if so, why the need to call it Thor’s hammer at all? Or is it just another example of how depraved the medical profession has become? After all, they all keep quiet about organ “donation” being murder, don’t they? And let’s not forget that birth control is abortion too – yes they kept that one quiet too (in fact they discussed it and THEN kept it quiet!).

So here it is – Thor’s hammer – being used in surgery in Australia. I quote below the picture:

thors hammer

Australian doctors are now using a miniature version of Thor’s hammer Mjolnir to perform surgery.

A hospital in Wagga Wagga, a city in the same state as Sydney, managed to get their hands on a three-pound hammer crafted in honor of the Mighty Thor that was built by a local biomedical engineering firm. The medical Mjolnir is made of medical-grade surgical steel, so it checks out.

For anyone wondering why a surgeon would need a hammer, they are often used to reshape bones and set implants. Surgical Mjolnir was first used last month to perform a knee replacement. The mythical weapon-turned medical tool was revealed on courses.com.au. […]

“The surgeons had requested we design and manufacture a medical grade hammer of increased weight as this increases the surgeons’ dexterity within the operation. We came to the idea of crafting our own surgical Mjolnirs as a way of demonstrating the unique ability to develop purpose-built surgical instrument.”

thors hammer 2

Link

Does this impact (if you’ll pardon the pun) patient’s health? The fact that this tool is associated with a demon god? I don’t know – I would always suggest that, just as you would bless your food before eating it, that you pray off yourself any demonic effects from any medical procedure that you have had to undergo. I would also remind you to go to God first before undergoing any kind of medical treatment. I am under treatment right now, and He is making it so effective! I am so aware that all the doors necessary are open, I am heard, I am listened to, and that He is in control. Read more: Go to God, or ask the devil?

What do you think of this? I’d love to hear your comments!

God Bless you

Lis

Organ donation versus abortion

What do organ donation and abortion have in common? More than you’d like to think.

First of all, they both end in the actual death of a living person, who was once knitted together in their mother’s womb (Psalm 139:13)

Secondly they are both performed without anaesthetic – of course ‘foetuses’ and people who are ‘brain dead’ don’t feel pain… or do they? Link Link

Thirdly they are very valuable to those removing their organs and killing them. “Today the transplant industry is a $20 billion per year business.” Link (quote is from page 2). Aborted foetuses are also apparently worth money to Planned Parenthood Link

No organ donation, or abortion were consented to by the victim, whether ‘informed’ consent in the case of organ donation, or by the so-called ‘foetus’ or baby.

They are both pushed for by society and doctors. In fact even the church is getting in on the act, calling for Christians to be organ donors, and that these are ‘sacrificial offerings’ – in total ignorance I’m sure, but human sacrifice is pretty much what organ donation amounts to. Link

Please help spread the word. Say NO to organ donation.

God Bless you

Lis

Organ donation will no longer be a “donation” in the United Kingdom

“My body, my choice!” cry the shrill feminists, as they rally to defend abortion (and destroy time-limits to it being carried out).

Anti-abortion activists also know that these women had a choice – they could have “kept their legs together” or used some kind of contraception. Ah, but contraception fails, the opposition cry! You still, ladies, had option one. You’re not animals, you can control yourselves, and NOT HAVE SEX!

*What?*

Outrageous!

Well now the same shrill brigade who defend the dismemberment of their unborn will need to think a bit further ahead. They will need to opt out of organ donation in the United Kingdom if they don’t want to be dismembered whilst alive themselves.

Yes, you heard me right – presumed consent is now wending its way through a deceived and deceiving political system which is so ignorant of the facts of organ donation (or evil, if it does know the truth) that it’s about to presume OWNERSHIP of your organs “after your death” – which we all know is a lie, because they must be taken before you die. (Link)

I thought it was a rather interesting point to juxtapose these two viewpoints. The women clamouring for the right to dismember their child, because it’s their body, and therefore their choice, and the now imminent law change which means that unless they have already decided (kept their legs closed) they could find themselves being dismembered for their organs.

What do you mean you didn’t opt out (of pregnancy; of organ donation)? You had the choice to (keep your legs together; to sign a piece of paper).

Shocking? Not in this evil world. Why on earth would you be surprised that this generation who would sacrifice their own living child on the altar of their selfish desire to “live their best life” would also contain those who would be happy sacrifice (for it is nothing short of an Aztec human sacrifice, the beating heart removed last) you or anyone else for an organ which will probably fail in the body of another.

#OPTOUT

#MYBODYMYCHOICE

#SayNoToPresumedConsent

My body, my choice – yet the government back the choice to kill the unborn, and the choice of doctors to take the organs of the living (killing them). What a sick society we live in.

Maranatha.

God Bless you

Lis

Hormonal contraception is abortion

You might want to make yourself a cup of tea (or fetch something stronger) before you read this. I had no idea, and I bet you didn’t either. In fact many doctors didn’t know this. Hidden from us by the (p)harmaceutical industry, the very definition of pregnancy was changed to ensure that these drugs could not be called abortifacients.

I have been blessed (oddly) to be someone who reacts rather badly to pharma drugs, so I have to be very careful and take few, and rarely, things which are necessary. I was never in a position to use the pill, although I took the morning after pill two or three times over the years (and reacted badly). After I became a believer, it dawned on me that perhaps I had been pregnant during those times, and I had to repent. It grieved me that I may have been responsible for that, although I didn’t know if I was.

That wasn’t on my mind however when I came across a random meme:

conspiracies

I counted up (34 was my score, by the way – 34!) and came across number 32, and immediately went to look up whether this could possibly be true. Oh absolute horrors, it is. I’ll quote from this excellent article, and I urge you to go and read it all. [Emphasis added]

In order to prevent pregnancy, birth control pills employ several mechanisms. First, the synthetic hormones may convince a woman’s body that she is pregnant. This can stop the ovaries from releasing an egg. The Pill also makes it difficult for the sperm to reach the egg, because the hormones thicken the cervical mucus, making it difficult for the sperm to live and move. The Pill also creates changes in the uterus and fallopian tubes that can interfere with the transport of sperm.[1]

Despite the hormones’ ability to prevent the release of eggs, sometimes a “breakthrough ovulation” takes place. How often this happens depends upon several factors, such as which kind of pill the woman is taking, how consistently she takes her pills, and even how much she weighs. Even with correct and consistent use of the Pill, some formulas allow ovulation in less than 2 percent of cycles, while others allow a woman to ovulate during 65 percent of her cycles.[2]

When a woman ovulates, she can become pregnant. However, the Pill has mechanisms that can cause an abortion before a woman knows that she has conceived.

These mechanisms include preventing the fertilised egg from implanting in the wall of the uterus. This causes it to starve and die.

Previously doctors had considered that life begins at conception (a view I’m sure you all share). In order to get around this issue, the definition was changed: [emphasis added]

Because many women would never have agreed to use a drug or device that could cause an early abortion, those in favor of such contraceptives knew that the issue had to be resolved. In 1964 a Planned Parenthood doctor speaking of another type of abortifacient birth control recommended that scientists not “disturb those people for whom this is a question of major importance.” He added that judges and theologians trust the medical community, and “if a medical consensus develops and is maintained that pregnancy, and therefore life, begins at implantation, eventually our brethren from the other faculties will listen.”[9]

One year later the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) decided to redefine pregnancy. In its words, “conception is the implantation of a fertilized ovum.”[10] Instead of defining conception as fertilization, ACOG decided that life begins nearly a week later, at implantation. At the time they said that this was because pregnancy could not be detected before then. Today science is able to detect pregnancy before implantation, but the ACOG still won’t correct its definition.[11]

According to this article (Link) the number of chemical abortions these medications cause is really shocking:

Some researchers (using very conservative figures) have calculated that the birth prevention pill directly causes between 1.53 and 4.15 million chemical abortions per year in the United States — up to two and a half times the total number of surgical abortions committed every year!

Let me put that in perspective:

abortion.jpg

I’m sure you are as appalled as I am.

This issue applies to all hormonal birth control, from oral contraceptives to implantable types.

So what to do?

If you have taken or used hormonal contraceptives in the past, or are now, you need to find out the method of action in the brand or type you use. Once you know how it works, and whether this issue has affected you, it’s time to draw close to God and to declare yourself, as His child, grieved to have been duped, and repentant for the consequences of that. The medical profession has yet another “black mark” against them for lying to the public. Informed consent only works if you are informed.

To be sharing this with you all is both a source of grief but also I am somehow relieved too, in that we can now say we know and decide how to go forward with the facts out in the open.

When we are ignorant of the truth we can be manipulated to make bad choices. Now we know we can decide to do things differently. Be gentle on yourself – you didn’t know the truth, but you do now.

God Bless you

Lis

Organ Donation is proof you can scam an honest person

The other day I had a call from an Indian sounding lady who told me she was calling me on behalf of Tesco’s and Morrison’s supermarkets to tell me I’d won a £60 shopping voucher. Knowing that I had not entered any competition to receive this, my instincts told me this was a scam, and I told the woman so and hung up.

They say you can’t scam an honest person, but if I had been brought up to believe that beneficent corporations would ring me out of the blue to give me money, I might have been fooled. And so it is with organ donation. We have been lied to so completely, so comprehensively, for so long that the public actually believes absolute lies on the subject. Their ignorance is fostered deliberately in order to continue the scam – a criminal act against the people of this country! In fact of course, without our ignorance it could never take place at all.

person.jpg

This lady claims she has been told her baby will die when it is born, and so has decided to carry it to term to “donate its organs”. There is something very wrong with the whole story – I actually suspect it is a false or planted story (I hope so, because otherwise this woman has been deceived into allowing her child to be killed – vivisected – for its organs).

The story begins with an error:

A brave mother who’s unborn child has died in the womb will carry her baby to full term in order to donate their organs to another dying child.

Hayley Martin, 30, from Hull, East Yorkshire found out at her 20-week scan that her child will die during labour or within minutes of birth.

Ummm – which is it? Is it dead, or will it die at birth? Is this just sloppy journalism? I don’t know. Then more strangeness:

While doctors suggested she get a termination to avoid the trauma of birth, she has decided to take the pregnancy to term so their baby daughter’s organs can go to other newborns in desperate need of transplants. 

At 20 weeks it would be classed as a late-term abortion and would be “partial birth” – I don’t see how that is less traumatic! (Read: Abortion – the story that brought a class of teens to silence)

The article then says she will be induced “Christmas week” a month early (why on earth would you do that?!)

Then it gets very sad because this woman really does not know the truth about organ donation:

‘I also know there will be babies out there who could have a chance at life with Ava’s healthy organs. Why should two babies die if one can be saved?’

However, the stoic mother-of-three still gets upset when she thinks about losing her tot.

‘I try to be as honest as possible and have a rehearsed speech prepared, but at times I can’t help but to fall apart and cry – especially when strangers congratulate me in the supermarket or at the shops’ she said. 

The baby has to weigh a minimum of 5.5lbs to become an organ donor and the couple are still unsure about what their daughter will be able to donate, but think her heart valves, liver cells and pancreas are the likely candidates. 

Later in the article they promote the idea of starting a charity in their unborn daughter’s name:

The Martins are also planning on starting a charity project in Ava-Joy’s memory to help other families who decide to carry to term, despite a fatal diagnosis.

They want to raise awareness of fatal fetal conditions, and support families by creating ‘memory packs’ to help them capture every precious moment.

You can read the full story here: Link

Something doesn’t feel right about this article. The images of the sad-faced Mum are there – all too posed and perfect. I cannot imagine any mother wanting to share such a personal and painful decision before the day. It smacks of propaganda for the organ donation drive. I’ve written before about this here: Link

Either this is an absolutely tragic story, made worse by medical deception, or it’s a planted story to test, or garner the level of support there is to bring in a system which expects mothers to consider carrying children to term for their organs. Which, by the way is sick!

I’ll quote from my previous article linked above:

The fact is the debate has been opened – that is what the article was designed to do – to open the debate and get you thinking that this was a viable option, and to guage the public’s feelings on the issue.

This proposal will move forward unless we say a resounding no again and again. They have begun this with a debate in a national newspaper, next time the debate might be in parliament – will you even pay attention to the news to know about it? Will your MP do what you want, as your representative, if you do?

The public are being softened up for this to become policy at some point – when they’ve suggested it enough times, and you’ve stopped saying no.

Say NO to organ donation.

God Bless you

Lis