Genocide by white feminism and female “empowerment”

Ugh!

I saw this headline today, and unlike the usual stories in the Daily Mail where there seems to be a lot of interest in couples, for example, but only if they are mixed race (promoting the Kalergi Plan) this one was different. This one was about the women who are going to save the world by not having kids (even though they want to).

And three out of four of them are white.

Because whites breeding (in spite of being the smallest race on earth) is just something the MSM and their masters don’t want to encourage. I quote:

Oonagh Dalgliesh is the first to admit she feels broody. She is enchanted by the idea of watching a baby grow up, of marvelling at that first crooked smile, those tentative first steps and the fledgling attempts at independence that melt most mothers’ hearts.

Even so, she has decided she will never experience the joy of discovering she is pregnant.

At 32, Oonagh is certainly of child-bearing age. With a well-paid job as an events manager, she is financially solvent. And for the past year, she has been in a serious relationship with a man who is longing to become a dad.

So what has prompted this momentous decision? Put simply? Her desire to save the planet.

‘Humans are the greatest single driver of climate change and greenhouse gas contributions, of deforestation and the acidity of the oceans,’ she explains earnestly.

‘The only thing that will fix these problems is to have fewer people on the planet. I don’t see it’s justified to make more people than we already have. Yes, I have a maternal instinct, but I will never change my mind.’

Link

So she is dating a man who wants kids, but won’t consider his needs or wants? Yeah.

She’s an empowered female. She thinks it’s her decision, but really it’s a decision which has been forged in the false narratives she’s read and believed. The elites would be so proud to read this piece – their lies and propaganda have infiltrated the very minds they want to destroy – the minds of white people. Because it’s not just her life she’s ruining, it’s her partner’s too.

When the Daily Mail depicts relationships it depicts race mixing:

promoting misc.jpg
Promoting miscegenation – the Daily Mail

People who sleep eight hours have more orgasmic sex | Daily Mail Online

and when they depict childless women in a manufactured “positive light” they are white. The genocide of whites is a real plan – it’s the Kalergi Plan.

Feminism was the first step – emboldening women to go and get their own jobs (become tax payers), and have their own money (emasculate their husbands), become consumers of goods designed and sold to them (creating a waste crisis – Read: I need to write about soap dishes) and even in the midst of this they were dissatisfied. Do you think Eve was satisfied? Not once she’d been presented with forbidden fruit.

Next came free love (promiscuity) and the promotion of homosexuality for men (“What harm can it do?”), and then abortion (“healthcare”) and then divorce. Each step played out in their front rooms for them to absorb and internalise – watching the Hollywood lies and feeling ever more dissatisfied with their lot. It became more and more about Me Me Me! The narcissism this engendered in women is something which has had far-reaching consequences for the following generations. Divorce became inevitable, and women wanted freedom. They broke their homes – their children becoming more and more incapable of maintaining their own relationships as a consequence.

Now it’s transgenderism in children (manifesting the mother’s narcissism), and the supposed ecological crisis of “climate change”.

Women are easily persuaded into the most foolish of beliefs by appeals to their feelings, their emotions. It’s not rational, it’s not sensible and it’s deeply destructive.

Bit by bit women have led a march – a march into absolute slavery. How far contrary to God have we walked?

We have walked so far from God that in my country you dare not open your mouth to criticise what is obviously wrong. We have 900 police in London looking out for hate crimes on social media whilst machete gangs roam the streets mugging, wounding, stabbing and killing innocent people. The crime crisis is there for a reason too – because multiculturalism DOESN’T WORK! But we got that through female empowerment too.

Tragically in all this the people who have lost out most of all are, you guessed it, women.

Because giving in to our whims has only temporarily sated out need to not feel dissatisfied, we are easily persuaded to feel dissatisfied all over again over something else. We have also lost the ability to get and keep a man – many women are so battered and bruised from dating that they are almost incapable of romantic love past the age of 35. We’ve gone about getting that which is most fulfilling the wrong way. We ignored God’s way, and did it “our” way – which is really satan’s way. In the process we have destroyed men, masculinity and the next generation.

Once upon a time we added our strength to our husband’s – we wanted to be the women of Proverbs 31! We knew our husbands should be respected, and they were our leaders (so we didn’t burn out with stress). We’ve made ourselves and our fellow men very unhappy indeed.

Satan is delighted, and even the church fails to stand against the wrongs done and promoted.

Lis

Advertisements

Why can’t Christians have nice things?

And no, I don’t mean Christmas, per se. I mean that to keep Christ, and things which are done for him in a well-meaning way, respected and not disparaged.

Feminism, Communism – all the “well-thought-of” isms – they are really out to destroy all that is good. The idea that feminism is good for women is so easily debunked after fifty years of it’s terrible reign. Women need men – we are different, and we complement each other perfectly (as God designed us to!). And this post really brings two of my most disliked things together. Feminism (in the form of misandry, or man-hatred) and the abuse of God and His Son.

You know that I have no time for Christmas – it’s a pagan thing and nothing to do with the birth of the Son of God. However, that doesn’t mean that I would want to see hymns which are sung to honour the birth of Christ to be messed with (even if, as I say, it’s for the wrong date and festival). When you mess with anything that honours Christ in a well-meaning, even if misguided, fashion you are being disrespectful to God.

How is it possible to combine these two issues? Perhaps you didn’t know it could be done! I hadn’t even thought about it until yesterday when a woman on Twitter declared that this was the best thing ever:

womin.jpg

Yes, women are doing it for themselves, apparently. Hmmm. Looks to me like self-aggrandisement, but there we are…

Inside this brief document we see:

womin 2

Down with men! Oh yes, because men, well, we just need more women, because boys are mean.

This is the first of their disgusting re-writes (they get more and more bawdy, and you can read them here at the Link)

womin 3

They are taking tunes from well loved hymns – some of which venerate the birth of our beloved King, and trashing them with foul and demeaning lyrics. They have no respect for Christians, and no respect for their fellow man. So much for “goodwill to all men” – they never wanted equality, they wanted to destroy men, and if they can give all of Christendom a good kicking while they’re at it, they’re even happier. This is the first verse of their re-write of In The Bleak Midwinter:

winter

Please pray for the souls of the lyric writers (both men, by the way?!) and the backers of this piece of filth. Even as you do, or don’t, keep Christmas, the intention behind it and the well-meaning of believers who keep it is not something to be mocked. Whenever Christ is mocked, it’s offensive to Christians who are, apparently, unprotected.

Whilst we may be fully aware that believers are fighting all the wrong things at times (fighting for the right to place a cross on top of a pagan Christmas tree, for one), that is not the same as being insulting towards the Messiah directly.

When will Christians be allowed to have (and keep) nice things?

God Bless you

Lis

The Advertising Standards Authority are now social engineers

Yes, the ASA, who are responsible for making sure that advertising is not misleading, are now branching out into social engineering (for which they are not qualified!). This article from the Daily Mail states: (Link)

Traditional portrayals of housewives are to be banned from advertisements in a crackdown on sexist stereotypes by watchdogs.

Depictions of women being solely responsible for cooking, cleaning and childcare in commercials will disappear.

But at the same time, it will become wrong to suggest only men are capable of doing DIY or are useless when it comes to chores and caring for babies.

The changes come from the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which argues that these stereotypes are limiting the aspirations of both women and men.

So it’s sexist for a woman to be in the kitchen cooking (we mustn’t offend the feminazis, must we?), yet what is clear to those of us who can think is that the removal of this ‘stereotype’ is JUST as much a limitation of girls aspirations! In fact of course, it’s a satanic subversion of everything which God says is right, pure and proper.

In case any of your are in doubt on my views on this (as a woman) – God’s blueprint for me is clear – I was created to be a helpmeet to a man. That was what He created Eve for, and that’s what He created me for too. He did not make me to be a CEO, but I could still be a CEO, if I could do that without compromising the role He created me for. To care for and nurture a husband and family is what God created women for.

The ASA wants to play its part in finally doing away with that. When organisations, whose main purpose is to make sure that misleading claims are not made for a product or service, start interfering with the structure of advertisements for a, frankly, satanic agenda, they’ve gone too far!

The public are entitled to see ‘traditional’ depictions of women and men, just as we are forced to tolerate seeing transgender women in advertisements for mother’s day! (Makes me glad I don’t watch television anymore!)

It is simply wrong to allow one, and yet deny the other. It is clear that satan’s agenda rolls on…

advert comment 1

God Bless you

Lis

The matriarchy speaks!

Watch out, guys. ‘Real women’ are (apparently) something else….

Whilst cruising around the ‘net, I came across this peach of an article – one which struck a nerve:

real men.jpg

Now, I like this because it’s true – oh so true. And I as a real woman really would appreciate it! But no! We can’t have that bcuz:

real-women

Now, what if I reverse this, and write:

Real MEN provide. Real women RESPECT it.

Can you see what she’s doing wrong here? She’s taking a superior tone – can you imagine the furore if the sign had read that?

Well the ‘wimin’ of North Carolina are in uproar, so much so that they are planning to hold a protest the against the sign in Winston-Salem, and are planning to put up their own signs all around the town.

I despair of my (ungrateful) sex sometimes. Where is the love, ladies? Where is the love?

You can read the rest of the sorry tale here: Link

God Bless you

Lis

White race doomed – and here’s a few examples as to why….

Oh this depresses me. When I see anti-child/anti parenthood articles in the Daily Mail, well you know this is designed to continue to advance the narcissistic ‘me, me, me’ generation, and their continual reference to self in every decision. You see once upon a time children were a natural part of life you just got on with – you had kids, it wasn’t really optional, and in fact you were considered to be unnatural if you didn’t want them, and an object of pity if you couldn’t have them. Once birth control made them optional, the narcissism of choice took over. Why spend your money on a child when you could have a foreign holiday every year?

Today that narcissism pours out all over the internet. (source)

hating-children

Yes, raising kids is hard work, I’m sure. I was never blessed in that way – I was one of the duped generation. But when I see these women who have children spilling the beans online about how they wish they had never had them, I think they are incredibly odd. I can imagine having times when you wonder why you bother – you know, the terrible twos and the terrible teens, but the love, you see, I cannot imagine that not overcoming it all.

I wonder if caesarean section births are to blame for this – they impact both mother and baby in ways the medical profession refuses to acknowledge (they can cause developmental delay in the child, which looks a lot like ADHD, and they can impair bonding from the mother, as the hormones released through normal birth are not there).

It’s the comments on the article, however, that really got me. These are the comments I made and their ratings. I don’t think I’ve ever been so unpopular for telling the truth. But these women must be able to keep dusting their empty wombs, and polishing their iPhones, I guess. More important than caring for the next generation. We are really screwed, aren’t we?

white-race-doomed

So Soros will continue to restock the farm with migrants, and white girls will continue to act as traitors to their race, by withholding their fertility for money (career), which is surely a form of reverse prostitution (which is is only another form of prostitution for Mammon, I guess), and these white girls, some of whom are travelling to the Calais Jungle to have sex with refugees, are the ultimate traitors of all:

traitors.jpg

Ugh. This article makes an extremely profound comment, and I quote:

“Feminism has created a social environment which has made it nearly impossible for women to fulfill this most basic biological function of reproduction, and so they seek to abolish it by any means necessary.

Their bodies and their underlying, basic animal psychology doesn’t really care whether or not White men respond to their monkey sex behavior and abolish feminism, or if they just replace us with foreign men who won’t tolerate feminism.

So no. The sex isn’t about sex. Because although virtually everything in life is about sex, sex isn’t about sex. Sex is about reproduction.

And women who are put in a position where their ability to reproduce is being blocked will respond will [sic] sexual behaviors which look extremely strange to men who have not taken the red pill.”

What hope is there, when white women round on anyone who says that children mustn’t be considered optional – how sad that I only realised that too late. Will this next generation realise in time?

God Bless you

Lis

I need to write about soap dishes

What?

Yes, I know, but bear with me, please. It’s been one of those weeks… I hope this at least amuses you a bit!

Soap dishes became, for me, an emblem of what society has become. You see the eco trend, and Agenda 21 would never have been mooted had the patriarchy not been smashed. If we still had a patriarchy in place, just how many designs of soap dishes would there be in the world?

Now, stop laughing, I’m serious!

soapdishes2.jpg
I can’t even see how the soap would stay on some of these, can you?

Just look at any of the stores you’ll find locally that stock homewares – they all have multiple different designs of soap dishes! I don’t think I have ever owned a soap dish. The bathroom beaker I bought when I first got married is the very same one I use today – maybe this is poor ‘womaning’ on my part, but I was brought up that you didn’t replace what wasn’t broken, and you didn’t buy things you didn’t need. Basins are designed, in this country, to accommodate soap without soap dishes, thus making a soap dish an affectation which is just uneccessary in my view (according to my upbringing).

So what’s my point here?

We’re in trouble if we think that Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 is anything to do with the environment – if it was, this example clearly shows that returning Europe to a patriarchal system would solve the eco crisis almost immediately.

Secondly we’re in trouble because mostly-indecisive and fickle creatures are now effectively running a fair part the world’s economy (if you exclude oil/gas/steel and armaments). Pandering to materialistic women is a full time job for the advertising industry – and of course there IS NO ECO crisis or this would have been stopped altogether.

And what’s worse is that a lot of women are seriously stressed! They are stressed by the power they have had given them by the NWO. They deal with that stress by trying to control absolutely everything around them, and everyone, because they can see what needs to be done, yet lack the instincts of men when it comes to outcomes. They feel un-supported by their men, and this only then adds to their ‘lonely-at-the-top’ feelings, and that feeds, often, into a somewhat-narcissitic belief that they are somehow greater than men, because men don’t care about minutiae. And they don’t…

I’ll share here a brief tale I may have shared before. A friend of mine was complaining about her ex-boyfriend. She said he wouldn’t use a coaster (there’s another one RIGHT THERE! A soap dish MKII). She said he’d always put his cup down and leave a ring on the coffee table. I said to her, “Varnish it – because he’s never going to care.”

She looked horrified. It was for her, easier to imagine subduing and oppressing this man – in fact she had left him, and one of the petty annoyances which had stayed with her enough to repeat to me was that he left rings on the coffee table.

rhett butler.gif

WE HAVE BIGGER THINGS  TO WORRY ABOUT NOW, SWEETHEART – like rapey-eyed Muslims and Somalians. We have psychotic leaders who want to push us towards war. We have BIGGER FISH TO FRY than the damned coffee table sweetheart.

Ladies, we must sit up and take note! I know the majority of you reading this are already on the same page, but that doesn’t mean we don’t benefit from hearing it again.

God Bless you

Lis

Jezebel rides again – wives ordering husbands about

Ladies, I know we sometimes get frustrated with our men, but if we know our bible we know we are there to help HIM and to support him to make good decisions. We can help him by making our preferences known, trusting in him and letting God do the rest! Nagging only causes a man to retreat into himself. If he questions himself enough, he will become brittle, and then can become the very thing you don’t want – another child.

I have seen this so often – husbands so weak their wives can find no ounce of respect for them. It’s not God’s order of things at all! Here are two ladies who have laid down the law to their husbands – these are the typical examples of what NOT to do!

woman

(Link)

This woman gave her husband a permanent reminder of his status:

shrew

ring

Perhaps she tought it was funny, and maybe he did too, but the message is loud and clear – she is wearing the trousers. Can you imagine how most women would feel to have a ring like that as a gift from their husbands? What better way to indicate your own insecurity and lack of trust in your spouse? (Link)

What do you think of this? Leave me a comment with your thoughts.

God Bless you

Lis