Why did Fascism fail?

We have been told that Fascism was bad. In fact those who began the movement are shunned and derided by the media even today. One amongst them was Sir Oswald Mosley. He and his British Union of Fascists stood against war, and believed in a United Europe of individual nations. He wanted no more “brother wars”. This is an admirable aim.

I watched this video the other day, and apart from the obvious reverence it has for Mosley, you get to hear a lot of him in his own words. It’s well worth a watch.

This article also appeared around the same time, and I thought it fascinating. I urge you to read it all (link below), but I quote from there:

First and foremost, Fascism is an economic system in which a nation’s government plays a central role in monitoring all banking, trade, production, and labor activity which takes place within the nation. Such monitoring is done for the sole purpose of safeguarding & advancing the nation and its people. Under Fascism, the government will not approve of any business activity unless that business has a positive impact on the nation as a whole and the people of the nation – this is the axiom which determines everything within the economic aspect of Fascism.

In other words, the government asks, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for our nation and our people?” If yes, it’s approved. If no, it’s not approved. When they ask, “Is it good?”, they mean, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for the workers, do they pay a fair wage, do they produce a product or provide a service which advances our nation & our people technologically, morally, spiritually, health-wise, etc???” For example, a pornography company would not be allowed because pornography corrupts people generally and exploits & degrades women particularly. Also, “free” trade agreements (such as what the U.S. has with China) would never be allowed because such trade agreements result in companies sending jobs overseas (where labor is dirt cheap). Such an activity, of course, would undermine a nation’s labor class. This is entirely unacceptable and thus not allowed under a Fascist economic model.

Fascism is based on free enterprise – but with constraints (the primary constraint being, “Is the particular economic activity in question good for our nation/people?”). Also, a businessman can become wealthy in a Fascist country, and the government has no objection to this (this is in stark contrast to Communism). Fascism also encourages private ownership of property (again, in stark contrast to Communism where private property is not allowed). (Link)

That all sounds pretty good. When you listen to Sir Oswald Mosley you cannot help but be moved by the power and wisdom of his words. Fascism is in the interest of the people – it supports free enterprise as long as that does not harm the people. It’s a philosophy, if you like, of growing. It’s a growth mindset – growth of a strong and stable people with their culture and their minds protected from filth so often peddled by, well let’s face it, Marxists/Communists and their ilk.

So why did it fail. You are going to take the words out of my mouth, I’m sure. Because God was not in it, because we, as a people, had turned our backs on God. It is one thing to call yourself a Christian, it’s another thing to walk with God and keep His commandments and His statutes. This we did not do – and so the healthy and well run country we could have had, perhaps, under Fascism was replaced with every despicable lust legalised. We ended up with war followed by debauchery (homosexuality, feminism, abortion) where we could have had strength and peace – and all because we thought we could do it of ourselves. We, as a Fascist nation could stand like the Tower of Babel – doing it for ourselves in the face of God, and God would rightly not allow it.

When we design a utopia, which Fascism could have been (much more than Communism), we stand in direct opposition to God when His Law is not our law.

Praise God that His Law stands forever. Praise God for the revelation of His words to so many again today. Praise God that He is merciful to those who love and trust in Him.

God Bless you

Lis

The Daily Mail twists it’s lies to suit it’s narrative

Headline:

extremism.jpg

Impression? The ‘counter-extremism’ unit are warning that Milo Yiannopoulos is an extremist.

Later on, however, we read (although, judging by the comments, no-one did):

facts.jpg

So it was not to do with what he might say, but concerns about demonstrations. And who would be demonstrating? Local NUT left-whingers (sic!). The complaint which sparked this controversy came from none other than a local National Union of Teachers rep:

“…Christine Dickinson, local secretary of the NUT, attacked the decision to invite someone who is ‘well known for his inflammatory views to speak to their pupils without contest’.”

So although it was not about what Milo Yiannopoulos was going to say, it has served to silence his free-speech anyway. This is how the left, and Cultural Marxists work.

You can read the rest here: Link

God Bless you

Lis

 

Peter Hitchens nails it –

I read his piece yesterday in the Mail on Sunday – an he get’s it just right. I agree with him:

“As an extremist, I am very worried about the planned Extremism Bill, which our Prime Minister is about to ram through Parliament.

So should you be. You are probably extremists, too, or will soon become extremists.

You may well remember when many opinions now viewed as despicable and more or less criminal were freely expressed – often by the same people and media who now condemn them.

I certainly do. Much of the conservative patriotic Christianity which my parents’ generation saw as normal has now been driven underground, and those who express it – especially in the public sector – face discipline or the sack, and are sometimes prosecuted.

Many of the current establishment’s attacks on Labour aren’t disagreements among free people in a free society. They are demands for abject recantations expressed by people who clearly think such views should not be allowed.

And the expression ‘extremism’ doesn’t mean anything objective or measurable. It just means a view that is out of favour with the current government and establishment.[…]

Yet, instead, we waste our time and destroy our freedom by futile attempts to control what people think.”

Yes, Peter, as an extremist myself – for example, I believe that homosexuality is a sin, and as such I’m likely to be viewed as though I might want to throw a gay man off a tall building which is the very last thing I would do, or condone, but hey, I’m an extremist. If you’re reading this blog, you probably are too.

You are committing a thought crime by even considering that the world is flat, just as God said it was. You are committing a thought crime by questioning the media’s version of events surrounding any of the too-numerous-to-mention false flag attacks, most notably 9/11. For being against war. For believing that unfettered immigration is treason against the British people. I could go on…

Get ready to be locked up for what you believe. What goes on in your head is no longer “nobody’s business” when your very facial expression can be read by a facial recognition camera and have you logged for further surveillance.

I am saddened that we have reached this point of all-out Stasi state, all out Communism in fact. It looks like fascism, but they are really the same. Easiest to refer to it as totalitarianism. That it certainly is.

God Bless you

Lis

How to stop people protesting migrant entry and crimes?

Simple – really.

Agents provocateur.

Also known as co-intel pro.

Yes, send a group of ugly, burly and violent thugs out to ‘represent’ Britain’s anger over the entry of migrants into the UK. Juxtapose that with a pretty girl  wearing vintage knitwear. But note that these are ‘fascists’ and photograph blood – oh yeah, do that.

how to stop a protest movement

Pretty isn’t he? Oh, and I forgot – liberal use of the swastika – yes the final perfect sign that middle Britain will shun. So the WHOLE of middle Britain now associates demonstrating against immigrants with risk, violence and the very real and unpleasant taste of being labelled ‘fascist.’

Hey, if any genuine group takes to the streets? Slam them – yeah, use the media to smash any desire in the UK population to stand up to be counted in their OWN country!

luton.jpg

Oh yeah, let’s ignore the nasty little muslim man claiming that the protesters are basically just jealous because ‘we’re taking over’ – no the Daily Mail ignores that completely. They are labelling this group ‘far-right’ without making clear what that means! No, this group is called Britain First, and it’s a nationalist group. Since we have evidence that islam is TRYING to take over, and is PLANNING to take over, well a nationalist viewpoint will be the only one that saves Britain for those of us who want to be who we are culturally IN PEACE! You can watch the video in a previous post I wrote: Link

Middle Britain is staying at home – this has been the case in most times of protest since the Poll Tax riots back in the late 80’s. Agents provocateur are very useful in keeping good people from standing up in numbers.

*slow hand clap* satan’s ploy – and it’s working.

Remember: ‘He who seeks to save his life, will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake, will find it.’

Prepare to stand up and peacefully PROTEST! If you are worried that you will get hurt, then you’re missing the point.

bonhoeffer

It IS evil to allow invaders to enter our country with the express plan of out-breeding us, and subjugating us and/or killing us in the name of the religion of ‘peace’. Ezekial 13:10 says:

“Because they lead my people astray, saying, “Peace,” when there is no peace,”

We must make our point, and fast, if we are to stave off the islamisation of all of Europe.

God Bless you

Lis

The UN – our new world government – more corrupt than any other?

This shouldn’t shock you by now. You should be hardened to the kind of appalling behaviour we see in high places – every government is now openly flouting morality on it’s way to obsolescence under a NWO one-world-government! But just what will that one-world-government look like? How will it behave? Well, if this is anything to go by, I choose anarchy (not the bad kind, you understand!). Let’s have no government rather than this band of amoral fascists.

free speech

Here we have the UN’s treatment of whistleblowers. This is from the Guardian newspaper. I quote:

“Ostracised, sacked … and even arrested: the fate of whistleblowers at the UN

Former employees say United Nations is failing to protect those who report corruption, malpractice or sexual abuse

When a United Nations investigator reported the rape of a refugee in Sri Lanka, she did not expect the disclosure to force her into a decade-long legal battle with her employer.

Caroline Hunt-Matthes was ostracised and eventually ousted while on medical leave. She has still not secured redress after a decade fighting her case.

Her case was remarkable in duration but not in substance. Hunt-Matthes is by no means the first or only whistleblower to fall foul of the UN system. Indeed, her case highlights neatly one of the UN’s dirtiest secrets: that its staff are reluctant to report abuses or corruption within the organisation for fear of losing their jobs. […]

The Guardian spoke to a current UN employee who had blown the whistle on organisational malfeasance. “It is all window dressing,” said the staff member, who wished to remain anonymous. “The offices within the UN that are supposed to protect staff members do the very opposite. They side with and report to management. For example, office of staff legal assistance and the ethics office, neither of which are independent. And you cannot appeal decisions of the supposedly independent ethics office because they are now considered ‘recommendations’.” […]

Peter Gallo is a former OIOS [UN Office for Internal Oversight Services] investigator who left the UN in March. He said the office lacked independence, saying: “Management of OIOS has been riddled with cronyism, incompetence and corruption for the past five years.” Gallo, like Hunt-Matthes, has tried to challenge in the UN’s court the ethics office’s decision not to consider him a genuine whistleblower.

“Nothing will change until there is real accountability in the organisation, and that will never happen unless and until there is a truly independent and separate agency established that is not part of the UN secretariat, but reports directly – and separately – to the member states.”” (source)

There we have it – and that is, by the way, an excellent article well worth reading – there’s a lot more information there. I can only say that this is no surprise at all – that a fascist government will be the fruit of a fascist organisation.

Why do I say fascist? Because when the souls who come forward to point out crimes and misdemeanours inside an organisation which claims to be the very pinnacle of acheivement in ‘governance’ are treated like this, we should all be worried because the response from a genuinely good organisation would be to welcome the criticism and expose the wrong-doing. When this doesn’t happen, you know that this organisation exemplifies ‘iniquity in high places.’

un fascismIndeed it is:

fascism cThe pale blue ain’t foolin’ anyone!

Did you know that the word ‘fascism’ comes directly from the word ‘fasces’ – those bundles of rods you will have seen if you watched the videos showing how Rome still rules today (Link).

fascism

There indeed is the laurel wreath with it.

If the UN becomes a world government, as we expect it to at some point, it will usher in an iron rule like the world has not know since Rome.

God Bless you

Lis