Taking action on dodgy medical ethics

So, what did you do before your conrflakes this morning to smash the patriarchy? Huh? Haha – actually I quite like the patriarchy, it’s more the medical establishment and their filthy lies that I want to crush. So in regards to dodgy medical ethics, as displayed by Dr Zoe Fritz in my last post (Link), I took action.

I wrote to Lord Carlile of Berriew, who takes a special interest in euthanasia issues, and opposes euthanasia. This is what I said:

foofhcrop

I hope that’s all readable for you. I will of course let you know what, if any, response I get.

I also then decided to contact Dr Zoe Fritz regarding the issue of informed consent for organ donation. This is what I wrote to her:

fooficropredact.jpg

I will, of course, let you know if I get a response.

Please keep spreading the message, this is very serious, and not to be ignored.

God Bless you

Lis

Ghoulish ‘ethicist’ wants euthanasia for coma patients, so that organs can be removed

Zoe Fritz.jpg
Zoe Fritz ‘ethicist’ and proponent of medical murder

Oh yes, she wants to push coma patients to the point where they can be declared dead and their organs removed  (vivisection). I quote: (source)

Hospital patients who are in a permanent coma should be given drugs to hasten their deaths so doctors can harvest their organs for transplants, a prominent hospital consultant said yesterday.

New laws should sweep aside the legal ban on euthanasia and allow the organs of those killed to be removed for transplant, Dr Zoe Fritz argued. […]

…Dr Fritz, a consultant physician at Cambridge University Hospitals, and a medical ethics academic at Warwick and Cambridge universities, said that where a patient is going to die ‘it could be in a patient’s best interests to actively end their life with a drug that would stop the heart both to minimise potential suffering and in order to be able to have vital organs donated.’

How, Dr Fritz, is it in the best interests of patients (in a coma, and therefore unable to CONSENT) to have any trace of hope removed that they might live, and oh by the way you’ll only die when we CUT OUT YOUR STILL BEATING HEART!?

Oh but it’s OK – she only wants to do this with patients who have expressed a previous desire to be an organ donor! From the same article I quote:

Dr Fritz said in her paper that instead of withdrawing nutrition and hydration, courts should be required to consider how a patient would have wished to die and their preferences on organ donation.

It added: ‘If the conclusion from this consideration – with appropriate safeguarding – is that they would wish their life to be actively ended facilitating the donation of their organs, then this should be respected.’

Well, phewee – I mean they’ve consented, right? No – consent requires INFORMED consent. No-one has ever given informed consent to be an organ donor.

Vital organs come from LIVING people, not dead bodies. What she is calling for is drugs to be used to cause a) brain death (a false definition of death), or b) cardiac death (another false definition of death, which can be declared in less than a minute in some US states). Then they intend to vivisect a LIVING human for their organs.

This is outrageous, and must never be allowed.

I commented, of course – let’s see if my comment gets published. This is what I said (while half asleep this morning!)

foofgcrop

Please share this post far and wide!

God Bless you

Lis