Why did the NZ Herald remove from their online article a sentence stating that a woman’s death had come just one day after her second COVID shot? (updated)

Rangitikei Environmental Health Watch

An article from the Herald we posted a link to this morning, originally included a sentence stating that Auckland woman, Pauline Hanna who passed away at Easter, had had her second covid shot the day prior. I quoted from it:

‘A source told the Herald [Pauline] Hanna was still sending work emails at 10pm on Sunday and that she had had her second Covid-19 vaccine earlier that day.

Sincere condolences to this family.

That sentence has since been edited out of the online version, however it remains in the hard copy (see below). Why did they remove this detail about the shot?

The NZ Herald have now updated their retraction of the sentence with:

Note: Those who opt not to vaccinate or who question the official narrative are frequently referred to as ‘anti-vaxxers’. These people are not ‘anti’ anything, they are simply pro-informed choice.

With all…

View original post 67 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s