First of all, bomb the heck out of the Middle East, and send all those fleeing into camps run by the UN and it’s NGO affiliates.
Then stop paying them in the camps so they’ll flee.
Then give them boats (how else did they get them?) and suggest they might like to go to Germany, Sweden and so on! Make sure they have life-jackets (yes, someone is supplying them with free life-jackets.) Basically: support a Muslim invasion of Europe.
Don’t forget to enlist the media to preach that these are ‘refugees’ fleeing a ‘warzone’ (rather than nice safe camps). Make sure when there are losses of life from these dangerous journeys to milk them for all they are worth, rather than facing the fact that these are Muslim invading armies who wish to destroy Europe.
Give them money and entitlements.
This is classic Cloward Piven Strategy. I’ve written about it before here: Link, but I’ll add a quote from there fore you:
“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
Inspired by the August 1965 riots in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles (which erupted after police had used batons to subdue a black man suspected of drunk driving), Cloward and Piven published an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. Following its publication, The Nation sold an unprecedented 30,000 reprints. Activists were abuzz over the so-called “crisis strategy” or “Cloward-Piven Strategy,” as it came to be called. Many were eager to put it into effect.
In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.” [emphasis added] (source)
Cloward and Piven would be proud. Apparently Norway is taking precautions as Sweden is on the verge of collapse due to the migrant crisis there, and indeed, Sweden has a lot to answer for – here we have Sir Peter Sutherland, a man who seeks to UNDERMINE the homogeneity of European nations – with mass migration, which he is in favour of. He works for the UN, and used to work for Goldman Sachs… (Remember when I wrote about ‘restocking the farm’? Link – the banks want this migration).
What Sir Peter and his cohorts really want is a truly homogenous Europe, where a white face is rarely seen. Where everyone is equally poor, and where islam becomes a dominant and massively destructive force. If they don’t want this, why enable and foment it?
So I have a message for our dear European leaders, including Mr Cameron:
We will vote OUT of Europe!
God Bless us all