LaRouche says – cry out to the UN – only they can save us from thermonuclear war! Another one-world-government proponent

According to Helga Zepp-LaRouche, a clear New Age Religious Movement advocate, the UN general assembly is the world’s last chance to stop thermonuclear war. I quote from her latest missive: Link

“More and more people worldwide are profoundly worried over what only a few prominent people are saying publicly: NATO’s confrontation with Russia and China is ongoing, and set to escalate, so that a global thermonuclear war is almost inevitable, unless we dramatically change our political course. […]

Where is the institution that can still intervene, virtually at the last minute? Where is the world court before which this great crime can be avenged? Are we, as mankind, collectively able to deflect from a course which is threatening to lead to our own destruction?

If there is any such institution at all, then it is the upcoming General Assembly of the United Nations in New York. A large number of heads of state and government will participate in this meeting from September 24 to October 1. Manhattan, during this time, will be the place where the fate of mankind will be debated before the eyes of the entire world and a vision for a better future can be agreed upon—or, to put it another way: The precondition will be set for whether we will have a future at all. […]

If this UN General Assembly succeeds, in the framework of the New Silk Road, which is becoming a World Land-Bridge linking peoples together, in adopting a common development perspective, primarily for Southwest Asia and Africa, but also for Central and South America—a perspective for which Russia, China, India, Iran, Egypt, Germany, France, Italy, other European nations, and the United States work together—then it would be relatively simple to overcome terrorism, so that people in these regions have a real perspective for their future, namely to rebuild their states economically.” […]

Geopolitics, and the idea of solving conflicts through wars, which, in the age of thermonuclear weapons, will lead to the extermination of the human race, must be replaced with the idea of the common aims of mankind, for whose realization all nations on this planet must participate. If the heads of government and other representatives succeed in inspiring their nations with the spirit that they must now, at the moment of the greatest danger for the future survival of mankind, dare to step outside the well-worn pathways of the oligarchical rules of the game, and come to an agreement on the great mega-project for the future of mankind, then we can be confident in the courage to solve all, really all, the problems of today, and begin a new era of mankind—an era in which mankind will be truly human and bring our laws and activity here on Earth into harmony with the laws of the order of creation, the Cosmos.

Only in that way will we survive as a species. And by that standard will the heads of state meeting in Manhattan be measured. Because if mankind is going to have a history, it will be remembered either as a monsters, or as extraordinary individuals, who succeeded, at the decisive moment, to realize a passionate, tender love for mankind, and usher in a new phase of evolution.” [my emphasis added]

Now, I wasn’t planning on having a thermonuclear war, were you? I mean if I had the button, I can’t think of a single reason to even wave my finger over it threateningly. I can’t think of anyone I’d like to threaten with it, and even more specifically I can’t think of any country that America might think needs a boot up it’s backside, who doesn’t already have ‘the bomb.’

So exactly who is planning this third world war? The Elites.

They have fomented a crisis to install a NWO one-world-government. Don’t think that Putin is really against this – most sadly, but likely is that he is yet again controlled opposition.

kissinger scumHelga Zepp-LaRouche is also behind this movement of the elites, as are almost every head of state. Note the line there from Kissinger:

‘…individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.’

If a one-world-government was a good idea why would I need to give up my rights to enjoy it? What kind of well being does this one world government have in mind for you and me? I can bet it involved annual vaccinations and the banning of Christianity – for the good of humanity of course. And euthanasia.

Sadly almost every soul who is against the current system has been brainwashed from the 1960’s onwards with New Age Religious Movement ideals which they express as ‘unity’ and ‘oneness’ – opposites of biblical concepts of separateness and being set apart for God.

A one-world-government is perfect, surely, for a united humanity? I mean everyone who is pushing the idea of unity has never considered what homogenised humanity could be put through in order to maintain it’s homogeneity! This guy, whose video I watched yesterday showed the same ideals again – unity, community, humanity and money is bad. Growth is bad for the environment, as if that has anything to do with mankind, and not to do with advertising and corporations. None of these people ever tackle, head on, the issue of how to end corporatocracy. Anyway, take a look:

So the ideas for the destruction of the current system all seem good, yet the outcome will be a NWO One-world-government, and with it the loss of individual rights, leading to tyranny, and genocide.

Just what the devil wants.

Steer clear of LaRouche.

God Bless you